Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Streetsblog

The Tea Party’s Selective Disdain for Transportation Subsidies

Does the Tea Party hate transportation subsidies or not? Sometimes it can be difficult to tell.

false

Here we have the Reason Foundation howling about $1 million for Capital Bikeshare. And last week self-styled GOP budget hawks successfully wrested away federal funds from bike and pedestrian projects on the grounds that such programs are "wasteful."

But wait! Bloomberg reported that in the same week House Tea Party Republicans voted to maintain a $214 million program that subsidizes air travel to towns like Huron, South Dakota and Scottsbluff, Nebraska -- something that folks at the Cato Institute and fellow Republicans have argued is an unconscionable use of taxpayer money.

According to the Associated Press:

Tea party lawmakers from rural areas were among those fighting the hardest to preserve taxpayer subsidies for airline flights into and out of small towns last year after senior Republicans tried to eliminate the oft-criticized program. Now, the House Appropriations Committee is awarding the program an 11 percent budget hike. Next year, the subsidies would reach a record $214 million under a bill the GOP-run committee approved Tuesday.

The subsidies can reach hundreds of dollars per ticket — and can exceed $1,000 in a few routes. A recent change to the program will soon take care of such $1,000-plus cases, but critics of the program say more needs to be done to shelter taxpayers from runaway costs.

Network blog Systemic Failure says there couldn't be a better example of hypocrisy on transportation policy:

You’ve heard of the bridge-to-nowhere and the train-to-nowhere. There is also the “plane to nowhere.“ This is the same Congress which eliminated high-speed rail funding, and severely cut bike/ped programs. Unlike the “essential” air services program, high-speed trains and bike paths don’t require operating subsidies.

I, for one, will be holding my breath until the folks at Reason write a scathing denouncement of this program. Or could it be that they don't really hate subsidies as much as the idea of providing services used primarily by city-dwellers. Stay tuned.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Pedestrian Observations outlines "Plan B" for California High Speed Rail. Bike Delaware reports that the state's general assembly approved a watershed $13.25 million for bike and pedestrian spending. And A View from the Cycle Path looks at the decoupling of bike and car infrastructure.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

EXCLUSIVE: City Will Let Mopeds Use Queensboro and Brooklyn Bridge Roadways

DOT hopes to prevent conflicts between moped and bike riders by allowing the former on the main roadways on the Brooklyn Bridge and Queensboro Bridge.

March 13, 2025

Chinatown Pols Renew Push for Cars on Park Row, But Residents Say No

Politicians say getting cars back on Park Row is their top priority — but locals don't want that.

March 13, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines: Sunset on the Capitol Edition

Sometimes on a slow news day in the city, it's worth heading downtown D.C. — where everything is on fire.

March 13, 2025

Cabbies Call Parking Fines Too Harsh, Demand More Dedicated Curb Space

The TLC hopes to target repeat offenders and make streets safer by increasing penalties for for-hire vehicle parking violations.

March 13, 2025

U.S. DOT Orders Review of All Grants Related to Green Infrastructure, Bikes

Now U.S. Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is coming for our bike lanes!

March 12, 2025
See all posts