Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Congestion Pricing

KOMANOFF: Relinquishing Congestion Pricing Exemptions Fantasies

Photo: Isaac Blasenstein

With congestion pricing seemingly in limbo, it’s more important than ever for New Yorkers to unite in support. That means relinquishing various “exemptions fantasies” — the idea that this or that class of drivers should be exempted because of X, Y or Z.

Of all exemption claims, the most risible, for me, are those from my fellow Manhattan residents: “We’re not the ones causing the congestion.” “Our car is just to get us out of town on weekends.” “You’re trapping us in the zone.”
Haha, if you hardly drive or mostly drive off-peak, you’re not going to rack up huge tolls. But rave on, neighbors, while I punch up my BTA Excel model [download here] and calculate just how much everyone else’s tolls will have to be jacked to give you guys a blanket freebie.

The linkage, of course, is in the $1 billion a year “nut” that Gov. Cuomo built into his toll legislation that passed Albany last March. It’s a safe bet that when congestion pricing finally starts up, the toll levels will have been set to deliver just the minimum billion. If so, exempting downtown residents, or firefighters, or Nobel laureates, will force other drivers’ pockets to make up the difference.

Let’s see how much. Here’s the “dashboard” from my BTA model running “Fix NYC, Komanoff prediction” — my best guess for what congestion pricing delivering $1 billion a year will look like.

InkedResults dashboard _ Fix NYC Komanoff prediction _ 5 Mar 2020_inked

See the red-inked entry in the green panel, showing $1,020 million? That’s the model’s net revenue projection if round-trip tolls are $13 peak and $4 off-peak. The $13 is pegged to MTA bridge and tunnel tolls, which are on track to reach $13 round-trip early next year; the $4 off-peak toll was found by trial and error to yield $1 billion or a tad more.

Now look at the blue-inked entry in the burnt-orange panel showing that Manhattan residents are in line to cough up 8 percent of the congestion toll revenues. (Including the Uber and yellow-taxi congestion surcharges in effect since early 2019 boosts their share to 23 percent.) Let’s assign half of Manhattan’s 8 percent toll share, 4 percent, to people living south of 60th Street.

To calculate the revenue impact of zeroing out those tolls, go to the model’s Policy Levers tab and add 4 percent to the assumed 4 percent share of “non-revenue vehicles, making it 8 percent. The dashboard will now display net revenue of $920 million — a drop of $100 million. A round of trial and error shows that the loss can be made up by raising my assumed $13/$4 toll combo by 10 percent, making it $14.30 peak and $4.40 off-peak.

There it is: a carve-out for congestion zone residents will cause everyone else’s congestion charge to go up 10 percent. (Unsurprisingly, exempting all Manhattan residents, north of 60th Street as well as south, requires a 20 percent hike in the charge to keep generating $1,020 million.)

Think on it. How will residents of Queens or Brooklyn react to the prospect of 10 percent congestion toll surcharges just to exempt drivers who live in the zone? Hell, even without a surcharge, exempting Manhattanites will surely cause everyone else to flip out.

Yes, we knew that. This exercise merely quantifies the impact.

This was going to be my message to Manhattan CB1’s transportation committee on Tuesday. But the meeting ran long and my presentation was put off till April 7. Nevertheless, I did get to cite the projection from my model that traffic volumes on the three East River bridges from Brooklyn to Manhattan are going to drop by one-fourth once congestion pricing starts up; what a boon to residents, workers and businesses habitually choking on traffic on the affected streets (and another reason to turn from whining to supporting congestion pricing).

Perhaps because I provided that projection at the request of the committee chair, members seemed to take notice. Let’s hope they’ll also have a sanguine reaction next month to my exemptions calculations and their corollary: clamoring for resident exemptions from congestion pricing is a fool’s errand.

Charles Komanoff is the leading expert on congestion pricing modeling. The current version of Komanoff’s BTA model can always be downloaded via this link. Requires PC or Mac Excel (will not run on Google docs).

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Likely Council Speaker Julie Menin Claims She’ll Work With Mamdani On Livable Streets

Julie Menin has declared victory in the City Council Speaker race, but will she be a friend or foe to the livable streets movement?

December 10, 2025

A Car Driver Ripped Off a Woman’s Leg in Broad Daylight

A Brooklyn driver drove onto a busy sidewalk in central Williamsburg and maimed a 33-year-old pedestrian. Why can't our officials prevent this kind of predictable incident?

December 10, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines: Dueling Rallies Edition

Astoria was ground zero in the fight for safe streets yesterday, with dueling rallies over the 31st Street bike lane. Plus other news.

December 10, 2025

Speaker Adams to Sink Daylighting Bill: Advocates

The last-minute move shatters years of grass roots advocacy.

December 9, 2025

Ex-FDNY Boss: Queens Judge ‘Wrongly’ Pit FDNY vs. DOT in Bike Lane Ruling

The former head of the FDNY slammed a Queens judge for pitting the Fire Department against the safe streets movement in a ruling that erased a bike lane.

December 9, 2025

Here’s Everything Wrong With the Judge’s Order to Rip Up the 31st Street Protected Bike Lane

A Queens judge overstepped her jurisdiction when she ordered the city to rip up a protected bike lane in Astoria, experts said.

December 9, 2025
See all posts