Skip to content

It’s Not Just Trump: House GOP Members Ramp Up Road-Building Campaign

Bill Shuster, the leader of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, is making a push for an infrastructure spending spree, even though the current federal transportation funding law doesn't expire for several years. Advocates will have to guard against a new road-building binge.
It’s Not Just Trump: House GOP Members Ramp Up Road-Building Campaign

Taking a cue from Donald Trump, the leader of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee is making a push for an infrastructure spending spree, even though the current federal transportation funding law doesn’t expire for several years.

Last week committee chair Bill Shuster, a Pennsylvania Republican, kicked off a campaign called “Building a 21st Century Infrastructure” with a hearing featuring testimony from freight shippers, carmakers, equipment manufacturers, and other interests that reap rewards from more road spending.

The campaign is still in the hype phase. We know that the highway building industry is excited, but no specific policy proposal has been announced. So far what Shuster’s committee has released is a list of vague “principles”:

  • Make smart investments, consistent with the fundamental federal role, to ensure a modern, efficient U.S. transportation infrastructure.
  • Leverage resources from all levels of government and the private sector.
  • Recognize, promote, and develop integrated transportation systems.
  • Empower state and local governments.
  • Encourage technological solutions and promote innovation.
  • Reduce regulatory burdens on U.S. businesses.
  • Streamline and cut federal government red tape to expedite transportation projects.

These principles are laced with code phrases. In conservative orthodoxy, for instance, “the fundamental federal role” does not include spending on transit. Meanwhile, “empowering state and local governments” implies weakening federal oversight of highway-centric state DOTs — an area where U.S. DOT made progress during the Obama administration.

The document does contain one explicit reference to “inadequate” “public transit and rail transportation,” but otherwise the language is standard boilerplate that refers to accelerated highway construction. With Senate Democrats talking about making common cause with the White House on infrastructure spending, advocates will have to guard against a new road-building binge.

More recommended reading today: Urban Milwaukee teases out trends in rural economies that might have helped elect Trump in Wisconsin. And the Political Environment reports that Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, facing fiscal pressures, has scaled back an unpopular highway widening in Milwaukee.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Streetsblog has migrated to a new comment system. New commenters can register directly in the comments section of any article. Returning commenters: your previous comments and display name have been preserved, but you'll need to reclaim your account by clicking "Forgot your password?" on the sign-in form, entering your email, and following the verification link to set a new password — this is required because passwords could not be carried over during the migration. For questions, contact tips@streetsblog.org.

More from Streetsblog New York City

Feds Charge Fraud Temp Tag Dealers ID’d in Streetsblog’s ‘Ghost Plate’ Series

May 22, 2026

State Pols Pass The Non-Controversial Part Of Hochul’s Car Insurance Reforms

May 22, 2026

Mamdani Says He’ll Back DOT Against Bikelash in W. 72nd St. Safety Revamp

May 22, 2026

Firefighters Flex Union Muscle In Bid To Keep Deadly Astoria Corridor Unsafe

May 22, 2026

Friday Video: A Bike Lane on Chambers Street!

May 22, 2026
See all posts