Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Around the Block

Mayors Stand Up to Trump’s Executive Order on Sanctuary Cities

With an executive order yesterday, Donald Trump followed through on his threat to punish "sanctuary cities," where local police do not report undocumented immigrants, by withholding federal grants.

The full implications of the order are uncertain. In New York, for instance, nearly $9 billion of the city's $85 billion budget comes from federal grants covering transportation, education, health care, and other priorities. But legal experts say Trump's authority to withhold funds would be limited to a narrow set of grants related to law enforcement.

Yesterday, mayors of sanctuary cities around the country made it clear that they are not backing down.

Stephen Fesler at The Urbanist passes on this statement from Seattle Mayor Ed Murray:

I want to assure Seattle residents that while they are right to be alarmed about President Trump’s divisive vision, they should not be concerned that this City will be bullied into stepping away from its commitments and values. The City of Seattle will continue to protect the rights guaranteed to the City and its people by the United States Constitution and will challenge any unconstitutional policies that threaten the security of our communities.

Trump may not have much leverage in these fights, Fesler says:

As far as possible federal funding that might be curtailed if Trump is successful in his anti-sanctuary city endeavor, it’s not clear how much is at stake in Washington. Under federal law, there must be a nexus between what federal funding would be allocated to a recipient for a specific use and what the recipient is failing to do. In this case, sanctuary cities like Seattle are generally not assisting the federal government in identifying undocumented and “illegal” immigrants nor housing them in jails if they do know that such person may be in violation of federal law. As a result, it’s generally understood that the only money likely at stake is federal funding related to law enforcement activities. For Seattle, that could mean a $10 million hit for policing. Other buckets of funding like housing assistance, healthcare, and transportation likely couldn’t be impacted. The irony of this though is that taking away law enforcement money won’t help end the supposed “carnage” that Trump claims to want stopped.

More recommended reading today: The Dirt, the blog of the America Society of Landscape Architects, digs into the new Global Street Design Guide from the National Association of City Transportation Officials. Seattle Bike Blog profiles an immigrant father who was killed riding his bike to one of his two jobs. And Transportation for America reports that Maryland Governor Larry Hogan is fighting efforts to make state government more accountable for its transportation spending.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

What Trump’s Tariff Chaos Will Mean For Transportation

Hint: expensive cars, expensive trains, expensive bikes, expensive everything.

April 15, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines: Clean that Plate Edition

On the eve of new city rules about covered or defaced plates, the king of Criminal Mischief offers a public service announcement.

April 15, 2025

Free Buses Would Mean 12% Faster Rides And 20% More Riders: Study

Want faster buses? Make them free. The benefits will end up paying for themselves, says Charles Komanoff.

April 14, 2025

Is ‘Walk Score’ Really Just a ‘White Score’?

A provocative new paper argues that one of America's most popular real estate tools is driving investment to predominantly white urban neighborhoods, without meaningfully expanding walkability for anyone else.

April 14, 2025

Monday’s Headlines: ‘And The Nominees Are’ Edition

Streetsblog is up for two prizes at this year's Deadline Club awards. Plus more news.

April 14, 2025
See all posts