Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
MTA

The MTA Needs to Measure Service in a Way That People Understand

TfL_ewt
This is how Transport for London communicates the impact of bus delays on riders -- in minutes, a metric everyone can grasp. Image: Mark O'Donovan/TfL
This is how Transport for London communicates the impact of bus delays on riders — in minutes, a metric everyone can grasp. Image: Mark O’Donovan/TfL

What if I told you that in the past year, the 4 train had a weekday "wait assessment" of 70 percent, down 1 percent from the previous year? Unless you're a dyed in the wool transit geek, your eyes would probably glaze over.

But what if I told you that on average, 4 train riders lose three minutes to delays on the morning commute, and the delays are getting longer? That would probably stick with you.

The MTA only uses one of these metrics to communicate service reliability to the public, and it's not the one that the public actually cares about.

In a post yesterday, TransitCenter made the case for the MTA to move beyond "wait assessment," which measures the percentage of trains with significant delays, but doesn't say much about the extent and impact of those delays. Instead, TransitCenter recommends tracking "excess journey time," which they say is industry best practice because it's both more precise and easier for transit riders to understand.

As TransitCenter's Zak Accuardi wrote in May:

Wait assessment is indifferent to how late a train is or how many riders are affected by its lateness. On a line with service every four minutes, a gap of six minutes between trains in the Bronx at 6 A.M. is equally as 'bad' as a gap of 15 minutes between trains passing through Grand Central at rush hour.

In contrast, excess journey time (and its variant, "excess wait time"), paints a clearer picture of how much time the average rider loses to delays.

Compared to wait assessment, TransitCenter says, excess journey time is more legible to the public, because it is measured in minutes, not percentages, and more accurately reflects the fact that not all delays are created equal:

If excess journey time for the 6 Train is two minutes, then that means the average 6 Train rider loses two minutes of time on each ride due to delays. And a rush-hour melt-down affecting thousands would reflect more strongly than construction-related delay at 3 a.m.

The MTA uses "wait assessment" as its primary metric for system performance, but TransitCenter says "eexcess journey" is more precise and easier to understand. Image: MTA
...and this is how the MTA communicates service delays -- in percentages that are difficult to understand. Image: MTA
The MTA uses "wait assessment" as its primary metric for system performance, but TransitCenter says "eexcess journey" is more precise and easier to understand. Image: MTA

But the MTA has defied advocates' push for a more coherent metric. In July, agency spokesperson Kevin Ortiz defended wait assessment as the "primary indicator" of system performance. "Our service delivery focus is on evenness of service," he told DNAinfo. "This is our focus because, generally speaking, our customers -- relatively few of whom travel all the way to a terminal station -- are more significantly affected by the time they wait for a train at a station along the route rather than the difference between the actual and scheduled arrival time at terminal stations."

This excuse conveniently obscures the fact that "wait assessment" fails to communicate the time passengers "wait for a train at a station," because it doesn't communicate time at all. It also gives the misleading impression that "excess journey time" is only a reflection of delays for passengers traveling to the end of a line, when the metric can convey average delays for all passengers on a line.

Other transit agencies have adopted excess journey time, and developers in New York have figured out how to apply it to MTA bus routes using Bus Time data. When will the MTA catch up?

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

DOT Stands By Astoria Safety Project Despite Foes’ Anti-Bike Lawsuit

Businesses are suing — and doubling down on anti-safety misinformation — about a simple and important traffic calming and protected bike lane project in Astoria.

August 8, 2025

Mamdani Promises New Path For Bus Projects As MTA Leader Finally Loses Patience With Mayor Adams

The Democratic nominee says he'll only ask one thing when determining which bus improvements will go forward: will it serve bus riders.

August 8, 2025

We Told You So! DOT’s Anti-Daylighting ‘Scare Tactic’ Now Fuels Pro-Car Pols

DOT is finding common ground with pro-car, street safety foes.

August 8, 2025

Friday Video: The Triumph — And Tragedy — of Summer Streets

Summer Streets is great — can we do this every weekend? Um, no.

August 8, 2025

Friday’s Headlines: Fixing Canal Street Edition

DOT will lower the speed limit on the Manhattan Bridge lanes that feed onto Canal Street. Plus more news.

August 8, 2025
See all posts