Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Andrew Cuomo

Cuomo Deal Could Clear the Way for a Transit-Oriented Tappan Zee

2:03 PM EDT on April 1, 2012

Regrettably, this was an April Fool's Day post. It should be noted that Streetsblog's prior April Fool's Day stories have a way of coming true, at least in part.

A little-noticed piece of legislation, passed along with Albany's budget deal at the Cuomo administration's request, seems to open the door to building a Tappan Zee Bridge in line with the transit-oriented vision that came out of ten years of public planning.

The legislation enables Westchester and Rockland counties to establish special tax districts for the purposes of funding bus and rail lines on the I-87/I-287 corridor and on the bridge itself, according to sources familiar with the arrangement. The financing mechanism resembles the method New York City is using to build the 7 Line subway extension. Under the deal passed by Albany, the new tax districts will take effect if both counties rezone areas near future transit stations to allow for walkable, mixed-use development.

Previously the Cuomo administration had taken an aggressive stance against building transit on the new bridge and funding the rest of the bus and rail corridors. At one point a Cuomo spokesperson insisted that the state would not build transit on the Tappan Zee unless the counties picked up the tab. The deal is seen as giving the governor's office a gracious way to shift its policy on the Tappan Zee replacement, following the widespread public outcry over its abandonment of transit.

Sources familiar with the legislation say the administration opted for the new approach after taking a hard look at the disastrous long-term financial consequences of building an extravagantly wide replacement bridge without any provision for transit. While no official announcement has been made, Cuomo is expected to interrupt the current project process -- a final RFP was issued last month -- and start over.

A high-level official participating in the negotiations said that after the administration cut off a decade of public planning that envisioned transit on the bridge, scrapping the last few months of brazen disregard for the region's long-term future was "no big deal."

Streetsblog will have more on this story tomorrow (Monday, April 2).

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Congestion Pricing Opponents Are Blocking Disabled Access to Mass Transit, Politicians Charge

Just as the MTA begins speeding up new elevator construction, congestion pricing opponents are poised to stop it.

February 23, 2024

Legislation Introduced in Georgia to Fight Temporary License Plate Fraud

The bill is the most significant effort yet to stop the flow of fraudulent paper tags from Georgia car dealerships to New York City streets.

February 23, 2024

Community Board Backs DOT Road Diet for Brooklyn’s Deadly Third Av.

“This is just a beginning of what we could do to fix our community,” said one board member. “This is not done, this is not where we finish off.”

February 23, 2024

Friday’s Headlines: More Lunch Consumption Edition

Streetfilms goes to Paris. Plus more news.

February 23, 2024

Advocates Slam Albany Pols for Using Transit Fund to Encourage Driving

Gov. Hochul and state legislators in Albany are spending a congestion pricing-adjacent fund on toll rebates for drivers and showing zero interest in bus or rail, transit advocates charged.

February 23, 2024
See all posts