Skip to content

Koch-Funded “Scholar” O’Toole: Seniors Love Car Dependence

If there's one thing we can learn from Randal O'Toole of the Cato Institute, the think-tank co-founded by climate change denier and fossil fuel industry billionaire Charles Koch, it's that the little guy in America is tired being pushed around by Big Transit.

If there’s one thing we can learn from Randal O’Toole of the Cato Institute, the think-tank co-founded by climate change denier and fossil fuel industry billionaire Charles Koch, it’s that the little guy in America is tired being pushed around by Big Transit.

Reports like Transportation for America’s “Aging in Place, Stuck Without Options” rankle O’Toole, whose selectively applied brand of libertarianism can be summarized as such: Subsidies for transit are anti-freedom, but subsidies for roads are pro-freedom.

What’s wrong with seniors growing older in places where they have no alternative to driving? Nothing at all, says O’Toole. In a recent opinion piece on Cato’s @ Liberty blog, O’Toole asserted that seniors don’t ride transit and wouldn’t given the option. He added — in all seriousness — that T4A is a “shill for the transit industry.”

Oh, boy. David Goldberg at T4A is firing back:

The T4America coalition is alarming to people like O’Toole because it is an unusual player in the battles over the federal transportation program: It is expressly not an industry group. Rather, it represents millions of Americans who rely on our nation’s transportation infrastructure and who want to see it preserved and expanded in ways that meet the needs of a changing nation.

O’Toole makes a big point of saying that not a lot of seniors take transit today. But that’s perfectly in line with our findings: Most live where transit service is poor or non-existent. In places that do have transit, the number of seniors taking transit is, in fact, rising, and that is accelerating as gas prices rise.

It is clear that cash-strapped states and localities can’t do what they need to do in the coming years without federal support. The upcoming transportation bill will allocate how our existing tax dollars are spent. We can keep spending on 1950s-era highway schemes and Bridges to Nowhere, or we can face reality and recognize the fact of aging, both of our existing infrastructure and our population, and dedicate federal support accordingly.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Urban Review STL praises the Champaign-Urbana region in Illinois for innovative use of technology in transit. The Missouri Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation examines cyclists’ financial contribution to road maintenance. And Car-Free USA shares a video exploring the true price of a gallon of gas.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog New York City

‘Game Changer’: DOT To Add Southbound Bike Lane Through Key Gap in Village

March 24, 2026

Gale Forces? West Side Council Member Wants A Bike Lane On Central Park Transverse

March 24, 2026

AT THEIR LIMIT: Boards Covering 1M New Yorkers Want Reduced Car Speeds

March 24, 2026

Tuesday’s Headlines: Above the Law Edition

March 24, 2026

Monday’s Headlines: We Fixed Congress Edition

March 23, 2026
See all posts