A Queens judge on Friday took the unprecedented step of ordering the city to rip up the partially installed protected bike lane on 31st Street in Astoria.
Judge Cheree Buggs waited until the last legally permitted day to issue the ruling, which defies years of legal precedent empowering the city Department of Transportation to redesign city streets as it sees fit.
DOT installed the protected bike lane on one side of 31st Street between Broadway and 30th Avenue last summer before a group of revanchist businesses sued, and Buggs halted all work on the project. The full plan called for protected bike lanes on either side of the street between 36th Avenue and Newtown avenues.
"DOT shall take all steps reasonably necessary to restore 31st Street between 31st Avenue and Newtown Avenue ... to substantially the same traffic markings, land configuration, and parking and loading regulations that existed immediately prior to commencement of work on the Safety Project in August 2025," Buggs wrote, according to a screenshot of the document posted on Instagram by NY1 reporter Samantha Liebman.
In their suit, bike lane opponents, who include popular Astoria mainstays like the Parisi Bakery, Sotto la Luna and King Souvlaki, argued that the project would "jeopardize" the safety of cyclists and "increase the likelihood of injuries" to pedestrians — despite city data and mounds of research showing protected bike lanes do the exact opposite. They also asserted that the bike lanes would create "impediments for emergency service workers" — even though emergency vehicles can use bike lanes when necessary.
A similar redesign of White Plains Road in the Bronx yielded a 41-percent drop in injuries to motor vehicle occupants and 10-percent decrease in overall injuries from traffic crashes, according to DOT.
Reps for DOT referred a request to comment to the city's Law Department, which did not immediately respond.
Groups of neighbors and business owners frequently sue the city to protest the installation of a bus or bike lane, but judges routinely rule in the city’s favor, citing state law that gives municipalities broad discretion over how to layout roads.
And earlier this year, a Queens judge allowed the city to move ahead with a bike lane project in Long Island City. But it’s not just bike lanes. In 2019, a Bronx judge allowed the city to go ahead with its plan to remove a lane from Morris Park Avenue for a safety redesign known as a road diet.
That same year, a judge allowed the city to build the 14th Street busway.
And, of course, it goes both ways. Earlier this year, a Brooklyn judge allowed the city to go ahead with a plan to remove a bike lane, ruling with the same logic: the city is allowed to make reasonable changes to the streetscape.
Such suits are often brought under Article 78 of the state’s Civil Practice Law and Rules, which allows the public to challenge the actions — or inactions — of local government agencies. Article 78 allows for judges to rule on whether an agency acted beyond its authority or in an arbitrary manner.
This is a developing story. Check back here for updates.
