Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
congestion pricing

Swiss Miss: MTA Claims Neutrality in Pro-Congestion Pricing Lawsuits

The MTA is sitting out the latest lawsuits aimed at restoring congestion pricing, according to an agency court filing.

The Streetsblog Photoshop Desk

The governor has to go it alone.

The MTA is sitting out the latest lawsuits aimed at restoring congestion pricing, according to an agency court filing.

For technical reasons related to state civil practice law, the MTA is a defendant in the suits asking a judge to force Gov. Hochul to end her congestion pricing pause. But the agency is expressing total neutrality as pro-congestion pricing plaintiffs and the gridlock governor's lawyers duke it out in court.

"[We] respectfully ... take no position on the merits," the agency's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, wrote in a brief filed last Friday.

That neutrality is interesting, given that the agency, with the governor's full-throated encouragement, was so eager to defend congestion pricing against New Jersey's federal lawsuit.

"This lawsuit is seeking to block one of the nation’s most progressive climate actions, and we will not allow it to derail critical investments that the region deserves," Hochul spokesperson John Lindsay said in October 2023 when the governor was still pretending to support congestion pricing.

The MTA's involvement in that and other anti-toll lawsuits also helps explain why the agency is sitting on its hands this time — and highlights the bizarre situation in which the state and MTA find themselves.

"Our own attorney general refused to represent the state in this suit. The MTA isn't so lucky as to stay out of it altogether, so their neutrality makes sense because of them being in this political mess," said Reinvent Albany Senior Policy Advisor Rachael Fauss.

The MTA, of course, stands to either gain or lose $15 billion as a result of the pro-toll lawsuits brought by the City Club and the Riders Alliance, Sierra Club and New York City Environmental Justice Alliance, so the agency must legally be a "necessary party." That, in turn, requires the agency to tell a judge something in response to being attached to the suit.

Certainly, it's disheartening to advocates that the agency isn't pulling a swerve on the governor by telling the court it agrees with the plaintiffs, it's also notable that the agency isn't endorsing the governor's legal argument that she's allowed to block the implementation of the traffic toll.

"It's fair to say they're not helping the governor in any way," said Fauss.

An MTA spokesperson declined to comment, saying only, "The filing speaks for itself."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Crossing the T’s: State Finally Signs Federal Agreement To Start Congestion Pricing

She can't back out this time — though there still are some court hurdles to leap.

November 22, 2024

Friday’s Headlines: City of Yes Edition

There was only one story yesterday: The embattled mayor succeeded in passing what might become the signature initiative of his one term. But there was other news, too.

November 22, 2024

Analysis: Mayor Gets the ‘W,’ But Council Turns His Zoning Plan into ‘City Of Yes … Sort Of’

The City Council took a crucial step towards passing City of Yes, but it also let low density areas opt out of much of the plan.

November 22, 2024

Five Ways New NYPD Boss Jessica Tisch Can Fix Our Dangerous Streets

If the Sanitation Commissioner wants to use her new position to make city streets safer for pedestrians and cyclists, here's where she can start.

November 21, 2024
See all posts