Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
congestion pricing

Swiss Miss: MTA Claims Neutrality in Pro-Congestion Pricing Lawsuits

The MTA is sitting out the latest lawsuits aimed at restoring congestion pricing, according to an agency court filing.

The Streetsblog Photoshop Desk

The governor has to go it alone.

The MTA is sitting out the latest lawsuits aimed at restoring congestion pricing, according to an agency court filing.

For technical reasons related to state civil practice law, the MTA is a defendant in the suits asking a judge to force Gov. Hochul to end her congestion pricing pause. But the agency is expressing total neutrality as pro-congestion pricing plaintiffs and the gridlock governor's lawyers duke it out in court.

"[We] respectfully ... take no position on the merits," the agency's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, wrote in a brief filed last Friday.

That neutrality is interesting, given that the agency, with the governor's full-throated encouragement, was so eager to defend congestion pricing against New Jersey's federal lawsuit.

"This lawsuit is seeking to block one of the nation’s most progressive climate actions, and we will not allow it to derail critical investments that the region deserves," Hochul spokesperson John Lindsay said in October 2023 when the governor was still pretending to support congestion pricing.

The MTA's involvement in that and other anti-toll lawsuits also helps explain why the agency is sitting on its hands this time — and highlights the bizarre situation in which the state and MTA find themselves.

"Our own attorney general refused to represent the state in this suit. The MTA isn't so lucky as to stay out of it altogether, so their neutrality makes sense because of them being in this political mess," said Reinvent Albany Senior Policy Advisor Rachael Fauss.

The MTA, of course, stands to either gain or lose $15 billion as a result of the pro-toll lawsuits brought by the City Club and the Riders Alliance, Sierra Club and New York City Environmental Justice Alliance, so the agency must legally be a "necessary party." That, in turn, requires the agency to tell a judge something in response to being attached to the suit.

Certainly, it's disheartening to advocates that the agency isn't pulling a swerve on the governor by telling the court it agrees with the plaintiffs, it's also notable that the agency isn't endorsing the governor's legal argument that she's allowed to block the implementation of the traffic toll.

"It's fair to say they're not helping the governor in any way," said Fauss.

An MTA spokesperson declined to comment, saying only, "The filing speaks for itself."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Brad vs. Andrew: Lander Wants Faster Buses Initiative Eliminated Under Gov. Cuomo

It's time to revive the Select Bus Service eliminated in 2018 by then-Gov. Cuomo, according to a new report from Comptroller Brad Lander.

April 11, 2025

Council To DOT: Do Better At Tracking Projects (So We Can See When You Fail)

Two bills passed by the City Council on Thursday will require the DOT be more transparent about project progress.

April 11, 2025

Friday Video: The Only Congestion Pricing Explainer You Need (Except Ours)

We've covered congestion pricing better than anyone, but we were pleased to see our Climate Town friend Rollie Williams jump on board. It's must-see TV.

April 11, 2025

Friday’s Headlines: The Times Loves Sprawl Edition

Look, we're critical of the Times, but the paper reached a new low in its call for more sprawl. Plus other news.

April 11, 2025

Hey, Sec. Duffy, DOGE Should Learn Cost-Saving from the MTA Not the Other Way Around

Sic DOGE on the MTA? Maybe Sean Duffy should reverse that — the MTA is spending money more wisely than in decades.

April 10, 2025
See all posts