The Postal Service Doesn’t Want You To Know Where Its Worst Drivers Are

The information the government doesn't want you to see. Source: Posts Service Inspector General
The information the government doesn't want you to see. Source: Posts Service Inspector General

Return to sender!

The United States Postal Service Inspector General won’t release the locations where its auditors found egregious fleet safety violations, citing a rule protecting “trade secrets … which, under good business practice, would not be publicly disclosed.”

The material in question is certainly not a trade secret. In 2012, the Inspector General’s office investigated whether managers at 23 postal service regions were regularly assessing the driving records of its delivery workers, many of whom operate large trucks under enormous pressures to deliver through rain, snow, and gloom of night and against myriad competitors.

Gregory McClean at the intersection in Brooklyn where his brother, Charles, was killed by a postal service driver. Photo: Gersh Kuntzman
Gregory McClean at the intersection in Brooklyn where his brother, Charles, was killed by a postal service driver. Photo: Gersh Kuntzman

The audit found that none of the regions’ managers “completed the required minimum [safety] observations” of drivers. Seven regions did not do any safety observations at all. And only two regions did more than 60 percent of the required safety assessments.

But the report was redacted, so it is impossible to know which regions had the worst records. On May 8, Streetsblog requested an unredacted version so that we could independently assess which Postal Service regions were completely ignoring safety, which were mostly ignoring safety, and which were making at least a decent effort to assess its employees’ driving records.

On May 15, Kathy Kikel of the Postal Service Inspector General’s Freedom of Information Act office rejected our request, citing “Exemption (b)(3), 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3).” A footnote in her letter explained why vital information about truck drivers’ safety records can be kept from the public.

Exemption (b)(3) provides agencies may withhold records exempted from disclosure by another statute that “establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld.” Title 39 U.S.C § 265.14, 410(c)(2) provides “information of a commercial nature, including trade secrets, whether or not obtained from a person outside the Postal Service, which under good business practice would not be publicly disclosed,” is exempt from the disclosure requirements of the FOIA. This exemption was enacted as part of the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970 and operates both independently and as an exempting statute within the scope of Exemption 3. This provision permits the Postal Service to withhold the unit pricing information.

We considered Kikel’s use of the exemption to be overzealous, so we called her and asked why she felt the exemption covers information at the very heart of the audit report’s purpose.

“Because it does,” she said.

We argued that it’s disingenuous to simply say a rule covers the thing you want it to cover without explaining why, but Kikel disagreed.

“The Postal Service regulation, Title 39, says I can’t give that information out,” she said. “There are reasons. We don’t necessarily tell where things have happened. You can’t [give out that information] because it could cause harm to the Postal Service.”

This is the message you get when you try to find that 2012 audit of Postal Service driving safety oversight.
This is the message you get when you try to find that 2012 audit of Postal Service driving safety oversight.

Indeed, it might — which could explain why the redacted audit report itself was mysteriously taken down from the Inspector General’s website entirely after Streetsblog started asking about it. We asked Kikel about that, but she did not get back to us. (The audit report mysteriously re-appeared after we left our voicemail. It remains redacted, however.)

At issue is something central to the Postal Service’s work in the city and, indeed, the nation: safety.

Postal Service vehicles operate without license plates, so the NYPD does not issue citations for violations or parking infractions, and therefore does not track the USPS’ record. Similarly, the Department of Finance does not have records of how much revenue in parking tickets the Postal Service should be paying for all the bus and bike lane blocking its drivers are committing. Other companies, such as FedEx and UPS, do pay traffic fines and are written up for moving violations.

The issue has drawn greater scrutiny in the days since a Postal Service truck driver ran over and killed Charles McClean on a Brooklyn street earlier this month. The driver was not issued any summonses at the time, and McClean family members complained that there is no accountability for drivers piloting vehicles without license plates.

The NYPD told Streetsblog that it does not know how many crashes have involved Postal Service vehicles. The House Oversight Committee, which oversees the USPS, has not returned calls. The Postal Service has not answered Streetsblog’s questions about its drivers’ safety records. And City Council Transportation Committee Chairman Ydanis Rodriguez has also declined to comment on city efforts to rein in reckless driving by the Postal Service.

Streetsblog will appeal Kikel’s ruling and update this story in the future.


  • Vooch

    Does it seem sometimes that Government Employees believe they are superior to mere citizens engaged in productive work ?

    I am struggling to fathom how did a government organization become so arrogant and unaccountable ?

    cue Larry L. and his data….

  • Joe R.

    Federal laws supercede state laws. It’s that simple. The USPS doesn’t put plates on its vehicles because no state law can require it to do so.

  • Tooscrapps


  • SSkate

    If someone is in her district, then ping Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s office for help extracting info from USPS. She’s on the House Oversight committee, which considers the Postal Service as part of its jurisdiction.

    Many years ago when I lived in the district of a congressman on the postal affairs committee, we had the best mail service.

  • Bots

    The numbers on the front top and back top are considered the license numbers.

  • FunkYourself

    They can “consider” them license numbers all they want, doesn’t make it so.

  • FunkYourself

    The writer of the article obviously doesn’t know that USPS has the right of way on US roads. Law enforcement can ticket them if they like, but USPS will get it thrown out.

  • Vooch

    In other words – the USPS could have plates on their vehicles if they wanted to.

  • Matt

    The requested information is pretty trivial to reverse-engineer. The 23 stations are also listed in Table 5, and the redaction is variable-length, instead of redacting the whole cell. Based on the obvious position of FDR Station, and after verifying a few others, it looks like the stations are in alphabetical order in Table 1.

  • nyc-cynic

    Is that still the case given the major revisions to the Postal Service in the 1970’s and 80’s?

  • FunkYourself

    It is. As a matter of fact an ambulance, a fire truck, a police car, and a mail truck all with their lights on can get to an intersection at the same time and the mail truck legally has the right of way. It’s a messed up law and I’m sure no mail person would actually try and go first, but it’s true.

  • nyc-cynic

    please, please, don’t tell me that EMT courses are still teaching that bit of urban legend. (And that you’re spreading it…)

  • FunkYourself

    I dont know why I would tell you that in the first place but ok, whatever you want.

  • qrt145

    [Citation needed]

  • FunkYourself

    I’m not your mother or your father, it’s not my job to put a plate of food in front of you tbh. You’re on the internet. A wealth of information is at your fingertips. Feel free to access it.

  • qrt145

    In other words, you can’t provide any evidence of this nonsense because it doesn’t exist. For the convenience of other readers, here is a thorough debunking of this myth:

  • FunkYourself

    See, you did EXACTLY what I told you to do. I didn’t even have to do any convincing. You take orders very well I must say.

    Using Snopes is a funny thing to do since they aren’t 100% accurate but whatever floats your boat.

    Btw, I’m going to need citations on your claim that I can’t provide any evidence. Lmao good luck champ

  • neroden

    Oh, it’s obvious this is not a trade secret and it’s illegal to withhold it. But Matt is right; the stations are in alphabetical order in Table 1, so you can figure out which stations are which.


Screen Shot 2018-11-06 at 11.00.41 PM

Wednesday’s Headlines: The People Have Spoken Edition

The election dominates the coverage today. Turn to the Times or CNN or even Fox News for the national recaps, but the biggest race for livable streets advocates was in southern Brooklyn's State Senate 22, where Andrew Gounardes apparently beat street safety pariah Republican Marty Golden. Plus the rest of today's news...