Bike Lane Opponents Put on a Good Show Last Night, But They’re Still Short on Facts

Some locals believe the future of Sunnyside is in mortal danger because some parking will be lost in the name of safety.

The crowd at last night's protest. Photo: David Meyer
The crowd at last night's protest. Photo: David Meyer

Last night’s 50-minute pep rally for the already-lost battle to stop the upcoming implementation of protected bike lanes on Skillman and 43rd avenues was certainly not lacking for enthusiasm. Brandishing signs with messages like, “Save Our Neighborhood” and “OUR STREETS,” the crowd of around 120 looked even larger as curious passersby paused to watch after exiting the 7 train into the “Sunnyside Arch.”

What they had in enthusiasm, they lacked in facts.

“This is not about parking spots, this is about our neighborhood,” Community Board 2 Chair Denise Keehan-Smith told the crowd, before listing off unsubstantiated, and in some cases, repudiated, allegations that the lanes will be unsafe for emergency vehicles and seniors and children. Keehan-Smith is a recent arrival to those talking points. Having joined the call for protected bike lanes after Gelacio Reyes’ death last year, she balked when DOT presented its plan last November, calling the loss of 158 parking spots — since reduced to 116 — “highly unreasonable.”

By and large, the event’s speakers and attendees were concerned with one of two things: their own access to parking and the alleged, but unproven, impact on small businesses from the city reallocating about one to four parking spots per block for pedestrian and bike safety.

“Some of the stores have already said, at the end of August, they may not be able to last because the businesses have clients and cars,” Master of Ceremonies Pat Dorfman told the crowd. “I have nothing against bike lanes, but we have to protect our businesses, churches, civic groups — parking here is already a nightmare.”

Bike lanes have gone in across the city, and small businesses have done just fine. The man who’s managed to convince Sunnyside residents otherwise is Aubergine Cafe owner Gary O’Neill.

Before DOT’s plan came out, O’Neill actually signed onto Transportation Alternatives’ petition for protected bike lanes on Skillman and 43rd avenues. He now claims that he was misled and that no one mentioned protected bike lanes, even though the letter he signed is explicit in that demand.

The anti-bike lane messaging has evolved over time to mask its true priority: 116 parking spots. Image: Macartney Morris
The anti-bike lane messaging has evolved over time to mask its true priority: 116 parking spots. Image: Macartney Morris

O’Neill’s refusal to own his actions is just the tip of the iceberg of his and others’ bogus and farcical arguments against the project, and a cautionary tale about fighting misinformation with facts in an age when objective truths are constantly under attack. Speaking to Streetsblog after the rally, O’Neill claimed that the bike lanes would impede the ability of fire trucks to make turns and that installing protected bike lanes requires at least three lanes of car traffic and hasn’t been done anywhere else in the city. He argued that his customers who arrive by car aren’t willing to opt for public transit instead and questioned the city’s goal of reducing the number of people killed on city streets to zero.

“We can’t legislate for every street in New York city,” he said.

“I drove over to Long Island City, on a Sunday morning 11:30, some weeks ago. Just wanted to park the car, and have a late breakfast just sitting in the park. I couldn’t get a parking spot, right? So I’m not going to go back and do that in Long Island City again,” he said. “They’re not going to take the train. They’re drivers. They drive.”

O’Neill’s wrong on every one of his points. The local FDNY engine house did express concerns about the initial design, but those concerns have been addressed — and now the FDNY has approved the project, according to both DOT and the fire department. Meanwhile, plenty of protected bike lanes exist on NYC streets narrower than the typical Manhattan avenue.

O’Neill also said both Skillman and 43rd are not currently unsafe. He is wrong: The recent push for a redesign was sparked by a tragedy and near-tragedy last spring, but the fight for traffic-calming on Skillman is over a decade old, as TransAlt Queens chair Macartney Morris noted earlier this week on Twitter. Between 2010 and 2014, there were 15 severe injuries, nine of which were people biking or walking, on the roadways, according to city data. Since 2010, two people have been killed on the two streets.

With more and more people biking and walking in Queens’ growing neighborhoods, ensuring safety to prevent the next fatal crash is imperative. Across the city, protected bike lanes have led to reductions in traffic injuries and fatalities for all users on streets where they’ve been implemented.

The bike lane opponents are right about one thing: the mayor has chosen to ignore the community board and build the protected lanes. Protesters called that a subversion of democracy, but it is not, by definition. The mayor is elected; the community board is not. And the neighborhood’s elected council member, Jimmy Van Bramer, sailed to a third term last fall after demanding protected bike lanes on 43rd Avenue.

Spooked by the opposition, Van Bramer ended up not fighting for the project, something he now says he “regrets.” Van Bramer says to expect a statement from his office today, which he told Streetsblog, bike lane opponents “will hate me for.”

Judging from last night’s crowd, which jeered and booed his name whenever it came up, they already do.

Asked for his take on how the council member played the months-long debate, O’Neill did not hold back.

“Played — that’s exactly how we feel. We’re upset,” he said. “I think Jimmy listened to a few loud people on Twitter instead of his local community.”

“Most of the people around here that voted for Jimmy, and they voted for him for many reasons, protected bike lanes was not on that list.”

  • Reader

    “I drove over to Long Island City, on a Sunday morning 11:30, some weeks ago. Just wanted to park the car, and have a late breakfast just sitting in the park. I couldn’t get a parking spot, right? So I’m not going to go back and do that in Long Island City again.”

    Everyone knows that Long Island City is just dying right now. Totally devastated by the lack of parking. No one wants to live there, there are no condos and luxury rentals going up, businesses are folding one after the other, and the parks are so desolate that the city has given up on basic maintenance like mowing the grass. It’s a ghost town. All because of bike lanes.

  • Simon Phearson

    The waterfront neighborhood in LIC is full of ugly, huge parking garages. If you can’t find parking there, you’re clearly just looking for a free, on-street spot.

    But you know what? If you’re trying to drive to Hunter’s Point during the brunch hours, you’re a menace. We don’t want you there. That whole area is unpleasant and dangerous with the level of traffic it gets. There are plenty of us nearby who are willing to walk, bike, or take the subway. We’ll happily brunch without you.

    You know one place I won’t be walking, biking, or taking the subway to? The Aubergine Cafe.

  • ganghiscon

    Really, Gary? I thought you were a cyclist. Why would you DRIVE to LIC?

    I would have stopped going to Aubergine over this whole bike lane nonsense. But the fact of the matter is, I had already stopped because I don’t particularly like it: bad coffee, food’s just ok, no wifi. My wife still liked a sandwich there, but she’ll never set foot in the place again after hearing him at the town hall. So I guess he was right, in a way, that the bike lanes may hurt his business.

  • JarekFA

    It takes 13 mins to bike there and 11 to drive. The guy wants to eat a late breakfast in the park. Is he like an internet troll that’s evolved into human form? Why not get a bike rack. Get some bungies. Put the food in a basket and tie it to the rack and thrown in a blanket. I literally do this all the time. And look what route google maps says to take via bike – evil Skillman ave.

    Like of all the trips for which you may need a car for parking vis a vis a bike. You want sympathy for your discretionary late breakfast one neighborhood over. At least involve your “has trouble walking” mother in law or something. What an incredible self own. My god – what a total and utter sack of shit this guy is. He whines like a man with a paper asshole.

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/931f3442869d2cdbae8f68a4dd354d5f5ec4a3f90f5a956806b3eb28a43a7f12.png

  • djx

    It’s like where I live in Harlem – nobody drives to there: too much traffic.

  • Simon Phearson

    Yeah, and I’d take evil 43rd to get to his cafe. Guess that he doesn’t want any LIC-based cycling customers, not without forcing us to take our chances in traffic. Not to mention the cafe is two blocks from the 7, which would put you close to the waterfront, too.

  • That this moron will no longer drive to Long Island City is very welcome news. Good riddance to him and to everyone like him. They will be replaced by people who have come by train, like real New Yorkers.

  • xospecialk

    I lived in Sunnyside for 4 years. I had a car, and every Thursday, or Friday, depending on where I had parked over the weekend, I had to move my car for ASP. I literally drove my car only on the weekends, and even then it was rare. I say this because you could tell that NO ONE actually drove in Sunnyside, it was always the same cars on the same street doing the same ASP shuffle. And really, no one is coming into Sunnyside and parking on Skillman or 43rd ave to goto the brothers cafe (delicious, but hardly a destination spot). These business owners really need to realize they serve a neighborhood of walkers and cyclists, and not drivers coming from near and far. Am I driving in from any neighborhood to goto the dog and duck? no sorry, there are plenty of better places in my neighborhood, Claret? seriously? no thanks. I go there because those are neighborhood joints, and not places people would drive to.

    EDIT: I wanted to add that business owners know that businesses are successful by the locals. Even if its a destination spot. Once the shine wears off, and it wears off quickly in this town, the locals are whats going to keep your business alive. And these locals..they don’t drive to your business.

  • ItsEasyBeingGreen

    Heh, unlike that Yogi Berraism it’s actually true though. There’s traffic without many people driving because it’s so inefficient. It’s like comparing a full multi-course restaurant with a full fast lunch place – the latter is serving a LOT more customers.

  • Simon Phearson

    I frequently bike through the area, on Skillman, before the businesses open up. Every street space taken by a car. It’s obvious the businesses don’t need the spots.

  • CtotheC

    I don’t understand why these people aren’t trolled. I would make mildly offensive signs like “YES to cars, NO to peds,” “Pedestrians should YIELD to cars,” “Public Transpo is for the poor – DRIVE!” and join their protests.

  • Joatmon

    I have no issue with protected bike lanes or losing parking spots. My bone of contention is with those traveling by bike who ignore the fact that they too must follow the rules of the road – stopping at red lights and stop signs, yielding to pedestrians, etc. – many ride like the rules don’t apply to them, putting themselves and those around them in danger.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG