Ignorance Reigns as Queens CB 2 Votes Against Protected Bike Lanes for 43rd and Skillman

Council Member Jimmy Van Bramer and U.S. Representative Joe Crowley have indulged an atmosphere of hysteria that was on full display last night.

Members of Queens Community Board 2 voted 27-8 last night against DOT's plan to redesign Skillman and 43rd avenues. Photo: David Meyer
Members of Queens Community Board 2 voted 27-8 last night against DOT's plan to redesign Skillman and 43rd avenues. Photo: David Meyer

Imagine for a moment that scientists invent a medicine that reliably reduces mortality with no longterm side effects, but before administering it, public officials seek permission from New York City community boards. And the community boards often vote not to use it.

That’s basically what New York does with protected bike lanes. Last night’s meeting of Queens Community Board 2, which voted 27-8 against protected bike lanes and pedestrian safety improvements on Skillman Avenue and 43rd Avenue in Sunnyside, was one of the more ridiculous recent examples of how this process can devolve into farce.

Despite the ample empirical data proving that New York’s protected bike lanes have reduced traffic injuries and the absence of any evidence that they harm retail businesses, the testimony last night was rife with assertions that seniors and children will get hurt and merchants will suffer.

P.S. 150 PTA co-president Diana Dumitru told the board, “We are opposed [to] this bike lane because of safety issues. This bike lane would be better… on other streets, and not on a street that crosses two elementary schools that serve 2,400 kids.”

But in fact the students at those schools will be exposed to greater risk of traffic injuries without the redesign — before-and-after data from dozens of protected bike lane projects in the city has proven as much. The entire impetus for the project is public safety, and the desire to prevent crashes that claimed the life of Gelacio Reyes and severely injured David Nunes last year.

The project would flip the existing bike lanes and parking lanes on Skillman and 43rd, installing pedestrian islands at some intersections and removing a car lane on less-trafficked blocks to deter speeding [PDF].

DOT made adjustments to the plan to appease business owners worried about repurposing parking spaces, cutting the net reduction in parking to 116 spaces — including 13 metered spots. Averaged across 2.6 miles of streets, it’s a trivial adjustment to the parking supply, for a project that promises to improve access for people walking or biking.

DOT revised the redesign so fewer parking spaces would be repurposed. Image: NYC DOT
DOT revised the redesign so fewer parking spaces would be repurposed. Image: NYC DOT

That had no bearing on the opinion of Aubergine Cafe owner Gary O’Neill, a ringleader of the businesses opposed to the project. O’Neill refused to accept studies of retail sales from other protected bike lane projects in New York showing no adverse impact. “They keep bringing up examples that have nothing to do with these streets, not just Skillman and 43rd Avenue, but anywhere in Queens,” he said.

It was an atmosphere of hysteria that U.S. Representative Joe Crowley and local Council Member Jimmy Van Bramer have indulged. Crowley, the powerful head of the Queens Democratic Party, came out against the proposal on the basis that the “community” opposed it. But plenty of local residents spoke out in favor last night.

“DOT has come up with a plan that’s based on their experience elsewhere and their toolkit, mostly, of proven methods to resolve the issues,” said Matt McElroy, who lives on 43rd Avenue in Elmhurst. “They’re trying to save lives. They’re trying to save our kids’ lives, our grandparents’ lives.”

“I’m very aware of the challenges to find parking in recent years,” said Woodside resident Katie Reilly, who told the board she supported the redesign. “I go down Skillman and 43rd every day, and it is dangerous.”

Van Bramer, meanwhile, had called on DOT to install a protected bike lane on 43rd Avenue after Reyes was killed, but then refused to endorse the project. Instead, he let a repetitive procession of town halls, workshops, and community board meetings delay action, citing “grave concerns from business owners” upset about repurposing what amounts to a couple of parking spots per block.

Van Bramer chief of staff Matthew Wallace told attendees at last night’s meeting that the council member could not attend because he was tied up in budget negotiations. Wallace declined to comment after the board’s vote.

DOT can still move forward with the redesign without the board’s approval — that’s what the de Blasio administration is doing with a segment of Queens Boulevard in Forest Hills this year.

As former NYC DOT policy director Jon Orcutt said on Twitter, the community board process could be restructured to incorporate productive feedback and sift out the fearmongering, instead of serving as a de facto veto point for necessary public safety improvements.

In a statement, DOT said it will “review our options”:

The design that was presented last night articulated our responsiveness to the top concern, which was parking loss. Over the past few months, DOT reworked the design to preserve as many parking spaces as possible, and in some instances, including in the commercial core, with no parking loss on the south curb of Skillman Ave and north curb of 43rd Avenue, respectively.

DOT always appreciates community board feedback , but considers the vote to be advisory on substantive safety projects. We will review our options for moving forward and continue the dialogue with the Board and other local stakeholders about making these streets safer for the local community and all Queens residents who use these corridors to shop and commute.

  • Maggie

    From “go back to Jackson Heights” last night, to “we work hard to keep this a NICE neighborhood” by preserving double parking, to transpo committee chair Keehan Smith cracking jokes in public about her preference for parking spots and driving over cyclist safety, this has been such an ugly process. I’m throwing up in my mouth at how Jimmy Van Bramer has let this drag on. He really didn’t step in when the CB organized an “anything but the PBL that cyclists asked for” party??!? I mean, really?

    I can’t believe Queens politicians are still, after all this time and given all the data, the demographic and public health case for it, and the environmental, moral, and economic urgency in making the street safe for bicycling on, willing to play this game. I really hope this street gets fixed before anybody else suffers injuries. Please just act. Don’t wait until a preventable injury happens on your watch.

  • KeNYC2030

    Let’s not forget that Van Bramer appoints many of the members of CB2. A 27-8 vote tells me all I need to know about the current makeup of that board.

  • Reader

    Advocates should tell JVB that whatever his future political plans are, if he lets more people die in his district they won’t get his support. Borough president, mayor, whatever he wants to be… none of it matters to the families of people he promised he’d help. 20 years from now, what will be more important? That JVB kept his career or that people kept their lives?

  • Jeff

    I’m going to be cautiously optimistic regarding DOT’s statement. I see no reason why they’d make such a statement unless they were serious about moving forward with the project.

  • William Lawson

    I hate to exploit a death, but the next time a cyclist is killed on that street we need to do everything we can to ram home to these ignorant Neanderthal scumbags that they have blood on their hands. I’m talking about posters up all over the community and protests outside stores owned by the people who fought against this bike lane. These are some of the most odious, pig ignorant and selfish people in our community and we have to fight them like the disease they are.

  • Unanimous

    Somebody young and in touch with a changing Queens should run for Borough President. Van Bramer is showing his age and lack of leadership on this one. Not showing up, or even offering a statement of support for a project he asked for is a bush league move.

  • will omeara

    take it easy. a small vocal empowered portion of our neighbors just voted to keep things the way they are. we live in a democracy. today we lost, but tomorrow checks and balances may override this illogical vote.

  • Philip Neumann

    We live in a Republic, not a Democracy. Let’s be clear about that first. We don’t allow the rights of the minority to be subject to a popular vote either.