Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
John Kaehny

Measuring Uber Traffic Would Be Impossible Under Cuomo’s Ride-Hailing Bill

Yesterday, we got a reminder of why transportation planners and transit advocates view access to Uber trip data as an essential tool, when analyst Bruce Schaller published a groundbreaking report on the effect of ride-hailing services on New York City streets and traffic. The growth of app-based ride-hailing services is, in fact, leading to more congestion, Schaller concluded.

Schaller relied on copious trip data from Uber, Lyft, and other companies to produce the report. That same data, however, would not be obtainable under the disclosure provisions currently laid out in Governor Cuomo's statewide "Uber" bill, which applies to the rest of the state outside of NYC.

In a letter to Assembly insurance chair Kevin Cahill yesterday, John Kaehny of the good government group Reinvent Albany warns that the absence of disclosure rules could have dire consequences for transportation planning in New York state [PDF].

As currently written, both Cuomo's bill and the State Senate's bill would require so-called transportation network companies (TNC's) to maintain seven years of trip records -- including date, time, and location for each trip. But state regulators would only be able to visually inspect a "sample" of the data "chosen randomly" twice a year.

Kaehny calls it an "absurd" process that would amount to "an essentially useless charade."

In New York City, TNC trip information is available on the city's open data feeds and "has allowed the public to make informed analysis about the impact of TNC's on NYC traffic and congestion -- which appear to be extensive," Kaehny writes. The Taxi and Limousine Commission just voted to require TNC's to disclose trip destinations in addition to origins.

That information would not be publicly accessible under the terms of the Albany bills. In addition to clouding the picture in upstate cities, it will be difficult for New York City to assess the extent to which for-hire drivers based in neighboring counties are making trips inside the five boroughs.

Ride-hailing services should be legal throughout the state, but the companies also need to be open with their data so the public can understand their impact on the transportation system.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Ugly Truth: Feds’ Canal Street Raid Pushed Aside NYPD, Safety and Free Speech

President Trump's heavily armed and masked immigration troops are turning American cities into battlegrounds — and eliminating accountability and free speech in the public realm.

October 27, 2025

Bikelashers Beware! Court Street Redesign Has Turned Chaos to Safety

Court Street's protected bike lane already shows a lot of promise. But that doesn't stop the hate.

October 27, 2025

Adams Administration Has Made It Nearly Impossible To Build Safe E-Bike Charging Stations

It's impossible to build an e-bike charging cabinet in NYC, despite city initiatives meant to boost the industry.

October 27, 2025

That’s Rich! DoorDash Supports E-Bike Speed Limit

DoorDash supports a 15-mile-per-hour speed limit, but that's easy for them to say, given that under-pressure workers will be the ones getting tickets.

October 27, 2025

Monday’s Headlines: Everybody to the Limit Edition

Mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani wants to keep the 15-mph Citi Bike e-bike speed limit. Plus more news.

October 27, 2025

Friday Video: Amtrak Is Way More Successful Than You Think

Why do so many people still treat Amtrak as a failure — and what would it take to deliver the rail investment that American riders deserve?

October 24, 2025
See all posts