Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
John Kaehny

Measuring Uber Traffic Would Be Impossible Under Cuomo’s Ride-Hailing Bill

Yesterday, we got a reminder of why transportation planners and transit advocates view access to Uber trip data as an essential tool, when analyst Bruce Schaller published a groundbreaking report on the effect of ride-hailing services on New York City streets and traffic. The growth of app-based ride-hailing services is, in fact, leading to more congestion, Schaller concluded.

Schaller relied on copious trip data from Uber, Lyft, and other companies to produce the report. That same data, however, would not be obtainable under the disclosure provisions currently laid out in Governor Cuomo's statewide "Uber" bill, which applies to the rest of the state outside of NYC.

In a letter to Assembly insurance chair Kevin Cahill yesterday, John Kaehny of the good government group Reinvent Albany warns that the absence of disclosure rules could have dire consequences for transportation planning in New York state [PDF].

As currently written, both Cuomo's bill and the State Senate's bill would require so-called transportation network companies (TNC's) to maintain seven years of trip records -- including date, time, and location for each trip. But state regulators would only be able to visually inspect a "sample" of the data "chosen randomly" twice a year.

Kaehny calls it an "absurd" process that would amount to "an essentially useless charade."

In New York City, TNC trip information is available on the city's open data feeds and "has allowed the public to make informed analysis about the impact of TNC's on NYC traffic and congestion -- which appear to be extensive," Kaehny writes. The Taxi and Limousine Commission just voted to require TNC's to disclose trip destinations in addition to origins.

That information would not be publicly accessible under the terms of the Albany bills. In addition to clouding the picture in upstate cities, it will be difficult for New York City to assess the extent to which for-hire drivers based in neighboring counties are making trips inside the five boroughs.

Ride-hailing services should be legal throughout the state, but the companies also need to be open with their data so the public can understand their impact on the transportation system.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Free Buses Would Mean 12% Faster Rides And 20% More Riders: Study

Want faster buses? Make them free. The benefits will end up paying for themselves, says Charles Komanoff.

April 14, 2025

Is ‘Walk Score’ Really Just a ‘White Score’?

A provocative new paper argues that one of America's most popular real estate tools is driving investment to predominantly white urban neighborhoods, without meaningfully expanding walkability for anyone else.

April 14, 2025

Monday’s Headlines: ‘And The Nominees Are’ Edition

Streetsblog is up for two prizes at this year's Deadline Club awards. Plus more news.

April 14, 2025

Activists Walk the Queensboro Bridge to Demand More Space for Pedestrians, But Lane Reverts to Cars Anyway

Safety issues were supposed to be rectified by the Department of Transportation until Mayor Adams stepped in.

April 12, 2025

Brad vs. Andrew: Lander Wants Faster Buses Initiative Eliminated Under Gov. Cuomo

It's time to revive the Select Bus Service eliminated in 2018 by then-Gov. Cuomo, according to a new report from Comptroller Brad Lander.

April 11, 2025
See all posts