Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Bicycle Infrastructure

Fast Changes to City Streets: A 9-Step Guide for Creative Bureaucrats

Marshall Avenue and Monroe Avenue, Memphis, Tenn. Photo: John Paul Shaffer
pfb logo 100x22
false

Michael Andersen blogs for The Green Lane Project, a PeopleForBikes program that helps U.S. cities build better bike lanes to create low-stress streets.

For most of the 20th century, cities answered transportation problems by adding more pavement.

More freeways. More lanes. More parking lots. More things that couldn't be reversed or revised.

So it made sense, at the time, for the public process around civil engineering projects to focus, above all else, on not making mistakes. Generations of city workers embraced the value of "Do it once and do it right."

But today's transportation problems are different, and so are the projects that respond to them. Naturally enough, the process of planning and designing such projects has begun changing, too.

From the experimental lawn chairs scattered across New York's redesigned Times Square on Memorial Day 2009 to the row of plastic posts on Denver's Arapahoe Street after a bike lane retrofit last fall, city projects are tackling big problems with solutions that are small, cheap, fast and agile. But until now, no one has created a short, practical guide for cities that want to create a program to do things like these.

Today, we're publishing that guide.

Tools that activate the constituency for change

Before and after on Delancey Street, New York City. Photos: NYC DOT.

Researched and co-written by Jon Orcutt, policy director of the New York City Department of Transportation from 2007 to 2014, it's built on interviews with staff in eight leading cities -- Austin, Chicago, Denver, Memphis, New York, Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Seattle -- to create a practical list of nine things cities need for a program that completes what we're calling "quick-build" projects.

The street design elements here aren't truly new; you can already find flexposts and paint in any city's maintenance yard. What's truly new about these projects is the process. They represent a new project delivery model, in between the familiar categories of "operations" and "capital."

Unlike projects that must be planned only on computer screens and paper posters, quick-build projects make urban design more public, accessible and transparent by putting it on the street, responding to its uses and adjusting it in real time. They free traffic engineers from guesswork.

They activate and excite citizens who want change, instead of only those who fear it.

Some people will recognize the treatments described here as "tactical urbanism." That's true, but quick-build projects exist on the middle of a four-point spectrum of tactical urbanism, as described by writer and planner Mike Lydon (who offered us some guidance on this project and whose book Tactical Urbanism we were glad to draw on):

Here's how our report defines quick-build projects:

    • Led by a city government or other public agency.
    • Installed roughly within a year of the start of planning.
    • Planned with the expectation that it may undergo change after installation.
    • Built using materials that allow such changes.

Within these four guideposts, there's a broad pasture of possibility for innovative cities.

You can download a print-quality PDF of our report here. Want a nice-looking hard copy to show your boss, your community group or your favorite politician? We've got those too. Email PeopleForBikes Marketing Manager Aisling O'Suilleabhain with a few details about who you are and how you hope to use it: aisling@peopleforbikes.org.

All this week we'll be publishing case studies from the report that show what does (and doesn't) work when cities put these techniques into practice on their streets.

We wrote last year that American traffic engineering is entering its most exciting phase in decades. The same is true of transportation planning and project management. With this report we're honored to be highlighting the work of some of the most creative bureaucrats in the country. We'll be even more excited to watch more and more smart bureaucrats find creative ways to adopt and adapt these principles in the years to come.

You can follow The Green Lane Project on LinkedIn, Twitter and Facebook or sign up for its weekly news digest about protected bike lanes.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Staten Islanders Fight To Keep Park Car-free

Politicians believe cars will make the park safer, but the opposite is the case.

April 18, 2025

Friday Headlines: Trump’s Revenge Tour Now Includes a Stop at Penn Station

U.S. DOT Secretary Sean Duffy is so eager to own the libs at the MTA that he's now taken himself hostage. Plus other news.

April 18, 2025

Exclusive: Cops Writing 15% of Their Red Light Tix to Cyclists, Who are Just 2% of Road Users

We received data from a Freedom of Information Law request showing that the NYPD is intent on writing red-light tickets to the lightest, slowest-moving vehicles instead of doubling-down on enforcement against 3,000-pound-plus killing machines.

April 18, 2025

OPINION: DOT’s Argument Against Universal Daylighting Has a Fatal Flaw

Hydrant zones and bus stops are not a suitable stand-in for universal daylighting — yet DOT is using them to argue against safety, our contributors write.

April 18, 2025

Helicopter Deaths, Fast and Slow

Choppers harm us. Suddenly but also steadily.

April 17, 2025
See all posts