Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Streetsblog

Commuter Rail and Inequality Within Transit Systems

This chart from Boston's MBTA shows how much operating subsidy (over fares) each mode of transit receives. Commuter rail is by far the highest, but is somehow likely to be spared cuts that may affect other services.
In the Boston region, commuter rail is much more heavily subsidized per trip than urban buses and trains, but is somehow more immune to cuts. Source: MBTA [PDF] via Itinerant Urbanist
false

In theory, transit is a big melting pot where people from all walks of life rub elbows. That may be close to the truth in some places, but in others the reality is often quite different. People riding city buses to work probably aren't as affluent as the people riding the commuter rail line into downtown.

Social stratification within transit systems goes back a long time, writes Sandy Johnston at Itinerant Urbanist. Johnston has been researching American commuter rail for his master's project, and he says the way these railways operate both reflects and contributes to inequity within transit systems:

Indeed, what Americans call commuter rail is, arguably, a fundamentally inequitable mode reliant on social exclusion. It’s a high-cost service whose fares are frequently unintegrated with other forms of transit and that runs only frequently enough to be useful to those who have significant flexibility in their schedule, or the privilege to define their own time management. But it has a powerful constituency that keeps it going -- and just functional enough to suit their needs.

For example, there’s been a ton of talk in the Boston area about cuts to the MBTA -- but, while expansion may be slowed some, there’s been little talk of cuts to commuter rail, even though it’s by far the most highly subsidized of the agency’s modes on a per-ride basis.

In a nutshell, this is why my senior paper research focuses on making commuter rail more egalitarian. The fundamental inequity of American transportation policy is the privileging of automobile use and abuse over everything else, but too much of the inegalitarian stratification that defined transit before World War II still persists. Indeed, in some ways it may have gotten worse. And that’s something planners and transit advocates need to address.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Greater Greater Washington explains how snow events expose weaknesses in suburban transportation systems in particular. Green Caltrain reports that a proposed transportation sales tax will raise money for freeway widening in Santa Clara County, undermining efforts to limit solo car commuting. And Green City Blue Lake offers 10 ways the Cleveland region is well-positioned to transition to a more sustainable transportation system.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Friday’s Headlines: The Polk’s on Us Edition

This afternoon, our reporter Jesse Coburn will journey to Midtown to accept Streetsblog's first George Polk Award, one of journalism's highest honors. But before that, here's the news.

April 12, 2024

Op-Ed: Police Placard Corruption Report Was Weak, Disappointing … and Completely Expected

The Department of Investigations clearly had ample evidence of crimes and serious violations, yet its report lets everyone off the hook.

April 12, 2024

City Unveils Design for Long-Decrepit East Harlem Greenway

Nearly two dozen blocks of crumbling greenway along the Harlem River are slated for a revamp in 2025.

April 12, 2024

Thursday’s Headlines: Bike Lanes are Good for Business Edition

A business owner testifies from the heart (and wallet). Plus other news.

April 11, 2024

Environmental Groups Join to Fight Adams’s BQE Reconstruction

Rebuilding the Moses-era highway for another century is not environmental justice.

April 11, 2024
See all posts