A story with major implications for development patterns in the U.S. is playing out right now in greater Milwaukee.
A sprawling suburb just a few miles from shore is the first community to seek an exemption from the Great Lakes Compact. Photo: Purple Slog via Flickrfalse
So Waukesha is trying to set a terrible precedent in water politics: It's applying to receive the first exemption to the 2008 Great Lakes Compact, a multi-state agreement that forbid the draining of the Great Lakes. This legally-binding compact was mainly fueled by concerns about water-starved regions far to the south, in the Sun Belt, pleading for resources. But Waukesha has proven that even towns just a few dozen miles from the world's greatest body of fresh water can beggar themselves.
James Rowen at the Political Environment reports that after years of political tussling with its neighbors, Waukesha has completed its application for Great Lakes water, and now the approval process is moving forward:
Despite the delays and blown deadlines -- if the DNR green-lights the plan and it wins the other Great Lakes states' mandatory and unanimous approvals to allow the diversion's projected $206 million construction -- revenue sources still not solidly in hand -- the Waukesha city water utility manager is in line for cash bonuses.
The decision-making process on the exemption will likely be politically-charged. Waukesha is a well-known national Republican stronghold, its growth largely fueled by people moving away from areas closer to the city of Milwaukee. In Governor Scott Walker's Wisconsin, it's unclear whether state's weakened DNR, where the words "climate change" are reportedly off limits, will be an impartial actor. Meanwhile, to win an exemption from the Great Lakes Compact, the plan will also need the support of eight governors -- a majority of whom are Republicans.
Elsewhere on the Network today: The Dirt examines the tracks records of various models of urban growth boundaries around the country. On Jane Jacobs' birthday, Market Urbanism reflects on her ideological legacy. And Seattle Transit Blog explains the political reasons why rail projects in the region often have more appeal to transit advocates than bus projects.
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.
Good news: We're not going to start our week with our typical ascent on our long-legged steed to criticize the Times for its flawed, car-centric coverage. Plus other news.
Plans for a major freeway expansion based on over-inflated traffic projections are a wrongheaded way to deal with the region’s rapid population growth.
Purely for political and self-serving purposes, Mayor Adams is attacking congestion pricing — and, in doing so, is undermining the implementation of a program that he has long claimed to be a "strong" supporter of.