Skip to content

Why Milwaukee’s New Train Platform Will Be Built at Two Heights

Here's an illuminating case study about the political and bureaucratic dysfunction that shapes transportation infrastructure in the United States.

Here’s an illuminating case study about the political and bureaucratic dysfunction that shapes transportation infrastructure in the United States.

A rendering of MIlwaukee's new train station. Image: Wisconsin Department of Transportation
A rendering of Milwaukee’s new train station. Image: Wisconsin Department of Transportation

Network blog Systemic Failure notes that Milwaukee is finally rebuilding its run-down passenger rail station. New regulations require the station to provide level boarding to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. But Milwaukee is served by two different Amtrak lines — with two different train sets that have different boarding heights. So the station platform will have to be built at two different heights, higher in the middle and lower on both ends:

How did this situation come about? It wasn’t just an historical accident, but a combination of bad planning and bad politics.

In 2009, Wisconsin received an $810 million “high-speed” rail grant to upgrade the Hiawatha line to 110 mph. The money was to pay for new trains and a revamped Milwaukee station. With new trains and a new station, what better opportunity to examine level-platform boarding? However, planners ignored the issue because Federal regulations (at that time) did not require it.

Then Scott Walker won election to Governor, and refused the HSR grant money. With the grant money gone, Wisconsin taxpayers were on the hook to pay for the station re-build.

Meanwhile, the FRA adopted level-platform boarding rules. Wisconsin appealed to the FRA for a special waiver, arguing that work on the station pre-dated the rule change — but the FRA was obviously in no mood to do them any favors. And so we end up with a sub-optimal design that has to accommodate antiquated rolling stock.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Chris Smith at Portland Transport explains why he thinks Portland’s proposal for $140-a-year “street fee” will be a good thing for active transportation. Mobilizing the Region finds a correlation between places that are dangerous for walking and other public health failures. And Pedestrian Observations discusses the best transit configurations for serving airports.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

More from Streetsblog New York City

Mamdani Continues Crackdown On Illegal E-Motos With Brick-And-Mortar Sweep

November 5, 2026

Sanitation Truck Driver Arrested After Killing Pedestrian In Bensonhurst

November 5, 2026

Election Recap: Street Safety and Transit Won Big Across the Empire State on Tuesday

November 5, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines: ‘Brace’ for Bike Lanes and Bus Lanes Edition

November 5, 2026

New York City Voters Give Mamdani A Green Light to Transform City Streets

November 4, 2026
See all posts