Skip to content

Attorney: Town Goes Too Far With Penalties for Parents of Helmetless Kids

In the quest for safer cycling, the village of Oak Park just outside Chicago has gone punitive. This leafy suburb recently enacted a mandatory helmet law for children under 17. Parents of tykes riding trikes and Huffys could face fines and community service if their children are caught without a styrofoam cap.

In the quest for safer cycling, the village of Oak Park just outside Chicago has gone punitive. This leafy suburb recently enacted a mandatory helmet law for children under 17. Parents of tykes riding trikes and Huffys could face fines and community service if their children are caught without a styrofoam cap.

A photo of the writer's daughter, learning to bike and wear a helmet. Image: ##http://www.mybikeadvocate.com/2013/12/oak-park-wrong-to-mandate-that-children.html## Chicago Bicycle Advocate##
A photo of the writer’s daughter, learning to bike and wear a helmet. Image: ##http://www.mybikeadvocate.com/2013/12/oak-park-wrong-to-mandate-that-children.html## Chicago Bicycle Advocate##

Attorney Brendan Kevenides at Chicago Bicycle Advocate says the new rule is too severe:

Few sensible people would dispute the benefits of encouraging children to ride their bikes. Bikes promote independence and good health for kids (and adults). They also happen to be really fun. Injuries sometimes occur, so kids should be taught safe riding practices and should be encouraged to wear a helmet. When kids wear bike helmets the chance of injury is very significantly reduced. According to Children’s Hospital of Illinois, “Wearing a proper fitting helmet can reduce the chances of serious head injuries by 85%.” It is hard to argue with statistics like that.

Yeah, children should be encouraged to bike with a helmet, but first they should be encouraged to just ride. Parents need some leeway with regard to how to accomplish that. The new Oak Park ordinance is fairly harsh. “Parents of children under 17 will be required to pay a $25 fine or perform up to four hours of community service if their child is caught three times riding a bicycle without a helmet,” according to The Chicago Tribune. Many parents will feel it necessary to force their children to wear a helmet in the face of this potential punishment. Some may even receive the misleading message that if the law requires helmet use perhaps biking is just too dangerous an activity for their kids. In my opinion, helmet use for kids and adults alike should be encouraged, not mandated.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Cap’n Transit says many of New Jersey’s cities are very bike and transit friendly, but traveling between them is a whole other story. Systemic Failure wonders what American rail planners have against articulated train sets. And Peninsula Transportation Alternatives reports the city of East Palo Alto is beginning a transportation demand management program to help workers find ways to commute without driving.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog New York City

Thursday’s Headlines: The AV Future Edition

March 26, 2026

Former NYPD Chief Admits Giving ‘Free Pass’ to City Workers, Right Wing Allies

March 25, 2026

Mamdani Budget Could Tank Queens Subway Expansion He Once Supported

March 25, 2026

D.C. Advocates Sue To Save Key Bike Lane From Trump

March 25, 2026
See all posts