Skip to content

Washington State Considering a “Symbolic” Tax on Bicycles

In the last few months, we've seen all sorts of proposals from states trying to keep their transportation budgets solvent.

In the last few months, we’ve seen all sorts of proposals from states trying to keep their transportation budgets solvent.

But here’s a new one — the pointless bike tax. Lawmakers in Washington state have proposed a $10 billion transportation spending package that will raise gas taxes and vehicle registration fees. In addition, the draft transportation bill includes what local media are calling a “symbolic” tax on bicycles.

Evan Manvel, writing for Seattle’s Cascade Bicycle Club, says the tax, which is expected to raise just $1 million per year, is misplaced:

The package’s proposed bike excise tax ($25 on sales of bikes costing more than $500) would harm hard-working small business owners. Most such bikes are sold by small family-owned bike shops and this would impose red tape and costs for them while creating virtually no revenue.

People who bicycle already pay substantial taxes for our transportation system, including the sales taxes, property taxes and federal taxes that together cover two-thirds of all transportation spending in Washington. Bicyclists who own cars also pay the same car tabs as everyone else even if they drive less.

In addition to serving no apparent purpose except “making bicyclists pay,” the tax is out of all proportion to the equivalent car taxes, as Richard Masoner points out at Cyclelicious:

A $25 tax is 4% of the value of an entry level $600 bicycle. Compare that against the 0.3% excise tax on new car and truck purchases. Both are on top of the 6.5% state sales tax and whatever local sales taxes that might apply. That’s a full magnitude of difference.

Meanwhile, Jonathan Maus at Bike Portland writes the idea of a bike tax has been tossed around in Oregon for a long time and it wouldn’t surprise him if it emerges in budget negotiations there as well. In the past, some Oregon bike advocates have supported such proposals, under the notion that it would help allay the perception — no matter how inaccurate — that cyclists don’t pay for roads.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Urban Review STL shows a great example from St. Louis of how a former gas station can be transformed into a truly lovable urban space. The Fast Lane shares U.S. DOT’s plan to make the nation’s national parks more accessible by transit. And Transportation for America writes that the latest standoff in Washington over the budget “sequester” threatens to be very bad news for the transportation programs that are most popular in local communities.

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog New York City

Monday’s Headlines: We Fixed Congress Edition

March 23, 2026

The City Is Doing to Prospect Park What It Needs to Do to All Parks

March 23, 2026

NYC Pols To DOT: We Want More — And Better — Summer Streets!

March 23, 2026

Why Some Members of Congress Want to Go Big on Greenways

March 23, 2026

Drunk Driver Arrested In High-Speed Harlem Crash That Killed Cyclist, Injured Four Others

March 21, 2026
See all posts