Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Streetsblog

The Fort Worth Chamber’s Hilariously Terrible Vision for the Future

false

So, you're probably thinking, what the heck is that? A Jetsons-era fantasy of a future city? An "urban renewal" project gone terribly wrong? The set for a post-apocalyptic version of the Stepford Wives, where all the people have been herded into pens by alien invaders?

If only that were the case. This rendering was in fact produced by the Fort Worth Chamber of Commerce, and it's their idea of a beautiful future.

Kevin Buchanan at Network blog Fort Worthology says, for the sake of his hometown, he hopes the future looks nothing like that:

The graphic, however, seems to be expecting the Fort Worth of 2050 to be indistinguishable from the Fort Worth of, say, 1996.

If Fort Worth of 2050 is built the same way, this won’t be a pretty place to live. We won’t be able to build enough gigantic roads and highways to support all those cars. We won’t be able to breath much, considering the resulting air quality. We won’t be a healthy populace, with so many more people shackled to a choice-free lifestyle that requires the use of the least healthy mode of transportation. We won’t have many places worth visiting or caring about, as 99% of the city will continue to be placeless, indistinguishable pods of garage-dominated homes and pavement-swathed strip malls.

Not to mention that this "growth" is wildly optimistic – if this city’s vision of 2050 is like this, and it’s still a place of separated-use unwalkable pods that have no relationship to each other, we’re going to find that the young up-and-coming generations will want nothing to do with Fort Worth – the handful we’ll have will stick to places like the Near Southside and 7th Street, while the rest will either leave or never come here in the first place. After all, 77% of millennials want some form of walkable urbanism, but at present I’d wager that only 1-2% of the city is even close to catering to that market. And the rest can’t, because our zoning and development codes outside of the handful of designated “urban villages” are totally business-as-usual, codified to reduce other forms of mobility in favor of cars and further coerced by a regional transportation network that is still dominated by highway building.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Bike Denver celebrates Colorado's new, aptly named legislation -- "End Hit and Run Loophole." Extraordinary Observations discusses the challenge of keeping Capital Bikeshare stations balanced. And Mobilizing the Region says it's time to restore New York state's commuter tax break for transit riders to the level enjoyed by car commuters.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

New York City Roadway at Risk of Dramatic Decline As Deadline Looms

Fewer than two dozen restaurants are in the pipeline for roadside seating, according to public records.

July 12, 2024

Opinion: Congestion Pricing Is A Compromise

Alternatives paths to cut congestion and pollution and fund the MTA make congestion tolls look like a cheap parlor trick.

July 12, 2024

Friday’s Headlines: Department of Victim Blaming Edition

Traffic deaths in the city are on pace to reach their highest number since at least 2013 — and DOT is reportedly blaming "jaywalking." Plus more news.

July 12, 2024

‘Suburban’ Queens Stalwarts Take Hard Line Against Housing — To Rest of City’s Detriment

“That's what they bought in the suburbs for, that's why they raised their family in the suburbs," said Council Member Joann Ariola, whose district contains 14 subway stations.

July 11, 2024

DOT Seeks New Camera Enforcement Contract to Better Catch Obscured License Plates

The city's current contractor has let hundreds of thousands of reckless drivers off the hook.

July 11, 2024
See all posts