Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Streetsblog

Race to the Bottom: The Sad State of Public Discourse on Gas Prices

It's hard to imagine another commodity that would become a top news story each time its price rose a couple of cents. But such is America's addiction to oil. And while the appetite for these stories appears to be bottomless, major media outlets don't seem to have much stomach for examining the complicated set of factors that undergird the issue.

false

Frustratingly, leading Republicans are doing a pretty good job convincing the American public that the president can dictate prices at the pump, even while they propose a transportation policy that would only further entrench American gasoline dependence.

Yesterday environmental think tank the Post Carbon Institute reported "nearly two-thirds of the voters say they disapprove of the way the President is handling gasoline prices and only 26 percent approve of his energy policies. Interestingly, 54 percent of those polled believe the President can control gas prices."

Nathan Hamblen at Network blog N8han speaks for the rest of us:

I am in the “dumb” group on all of the questions. I disapprove of the way the government has long handled gasoline prices, by failing to put a substantial tax on it when prices were low. Doing so would have given us some room to maneuver in the future, when prices start to rise in earnest. I do not approve of the president’s energy polices, which strive to burn all remaining fuel reserves as quickly and cheaply as possible. And finally, of course the president (or government) can control (or affect) gas prices: they can increase them with a tax. Our government is unable to lower gas prices in a crisis only because it has insufficiently taxed gas in the past. And we are too recognizably broke to attempt a direct subsidy—one hopes.

For all the wrong reasons, the population correctly disapproves of American energy policy. They may go on disapproving, and electing increasingly ridiculous charlatans promising the impossible, until they get to choose between food and gasoline, or neither.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Steven Can Plan analyzes how the Chicago area splits its air pollution reduction funds between road projects and active transportation, and the resulting environmental impacts. Transit Miami, after putting pressure on FDOT to build safer roads, wins a victory for pedestrians and cyclists. And Rust Wire looks at the life- and attitude-altering decision to go car-free in a second-tier city.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Wednesday’s Headlines: Slow ‘Em Down Edition

Here's one day when it's OK for reporters to drive a car! (OK, not just any car.) Plus other news.

November 12, 2025

West Village Pol Demands DOT Act after Fatal Pedestrian Crash

Erik Bottcher has demanded that the city review the design of the West Village intersection where a cargo van driver killed a pedestrian earlier this month.

November 12, 2025

Opinion: Free Buses Can’t Come at Paratransit Riders’ Expense

Critically missing from the discourse on free buses are the implications a fare-free system would have for the MTA’s Access-A-Ride.

November 12, 2025

Drivers Run Red Light, But Cops Ticket Cyclists at Dangerous Delancey Intersection

Drivers are zooming onto and off the Williamsburg Bridge in Lower Manhattan by running red lights. But cops are targeting cyclists instead.

November 11, 2025

Two More Staffers Join the Growing Streetsblog Newsroom!

Meet Austin C. Jefferson and J.K. Trotter! And read about our big plans for local news.

November 11, 2025
See all posts