Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In

Another day, another questionable proposal to enhance cyclist "safety."

Last week brought news that a New York City councilman has proposed legislation requiring licensure for cyclists. Then there was the proposal to ban cycling with child passengers in Oregon and another licensure call in New Jersey -- both thankfully dismissed.

Now a new bill has made its way into the Oregon statehouse and, once again, it conveniently sidesteps the foremost risk to cyclists: cars. Democratic Representative Michael Schaufler has proposed up to a $90 fine for cyclists caught in the deviant act of listening to headphones.

false

Jonathan Maus at Network blog Bike Portland has all the details:

Like Rep. Mitch Greenlick, who said he proposed the six-and-under biking ban out of a concern for safety, Schaufler is also motivated by safety. He told me last week that "I just saw some guy driving down the street on their bike with their headphones on and thought, 'He could get run over.' It's a safety issue. It's pretty cut and dry. It's a very simple, very basic concept."

What's interesting about this proposal is that, the way it's currently written, it would create an entirely new violation — "unsafe operation of a bicycle" — in the vehicle code. If passed, it's possible that additional provisions could be added to this law in the name of safety. Another thing to keep in mind is that, because of the way our current cell phone law is worded, it's unclear whether or not it applies to bicycle operators.

As for Rep. Schaufler, he's reportedly frustrated with "the online opposition from cyclists." Here's what he told the Willamette Week recently:

"They (cyclists) are the ones that are complaining about it,” Schaufler said. “People on bicycles ask for a whole lot and then they say, ‘don’t regulate us!’"

Maus has been soliciting comments from Bike Portland readers, who have made some interesting points. Would lawmakers better protect cyclists by trying to cut down on distractions for motorists -- including, for instance, car audio systems?

Elsewhere on the Network today: Copenhagenize discusses an especially ludicrous idea -- banning winter cycling -- put forth by newspaper commenters in Ontario. Ecocity Publicity Mobility introduces a new comic book illustrating car-free transportation options from around the world (you can see it in electronic form too). And American Dirt comments on the ubiquity of asphalt in America and its surprising effect on the natural environment.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

The City Is Doing to Prospect Park What It Needs to Do to All Parks

A long-awaited bike lane in Brooklyn will create almost full protected cycling coverage around Prospect Park — setting a new standard for the rest of the city.

March 23, 2026

NYC Pols To DOT: We Want More — And Better — Summer Streets!

A group of 29 current and former elected officials asked DOT to expand the car-free streets program so that it's not just a few random Saturdays along unconnected stretches.

March 23, 2026

Why Some Members of Congress Want to Go Big on Greenways

A new bill would multiply federal funding for walking and biking paths — even as some powerful congresspeople threaten to take away what we've already got.

March 23, 2026

Monday’s Headlines: We Fixed Congress Edition

DOT installed "don't walk" signs next to pedestrians ramps in Brooklyn, then removed them after Streetsblog started asking questions. Plus more news.

March 23, 2026

VIDEO: Reckless Driver Kills Cyclist, Injures Four Others in Harlem Crash That Shows Need For Speed Caps

The 8 p.m. crash comes just a few days after Mayor Mamdani was criticized by the pro-car right for announcing that speed-limit reductions in school zones would be in effect all day, not just during school hours.

March 20, 2026
See all posts