Skip to content

Good Transit Saves American Households $1,575 Per Year

To be really thrifty, invest in transit, new research shows. Image: Marshall Astor via Flickr. High quality transit in large American cities is saving households an average of $1,575 per year, according to new research by Victoria Transport Policy Institute director Todd Litman [PDF]. That’s not even counting indirect benefits like reducing congestion or improving … Continued
Thrifty_Gas.jpgTo be really thrifty, invest in transit, new research shows. Image: Marshall Astor via Flickr.

High quality transit in large American cities is saving households an average of $1,575 per year, according to new research by Victoria Transport Policy Institute director Todd Litman [PDF]. That’s not even counting indirect benefits like reducing congestion or improving health. It’s simple math, with the price of fares and the cost of providing high-quality transit infrastructure and service on one side, and spending on roads, cars, gas and parking on the other.

Conventional economic evaluation of transportation only compares the cost of building transit to the cost of building roads, Litman says. But when it comes to providing choices for how to get around, what matters to most people is the effect on their wallets. Paying for transit through fares or taxes is a bargain if it means you don’t have to pay for a car or a garage.

The analysis compares transportation costs in the seven American cities with high-quality transit (New York, Washington DC, Boston, San Francisco, Chicago, Philadelphia and Baltimore) to transportation costs in other large cities.

It’s worth noting that Litman’s numbers are averages, so while many households save with a high-quality transit system, some end up paying more than they would otherwise. If every household saved $1,575 from transit, there would probably be a lot less support for car infrastructure.

Litman’s research adds to the body of evidence disproving the argument that transit investment isn’t worth the expense compared to spending on car infrastructure. Quite the opposite, in fact. 

Photo of Noah Kazis
Noah joined Streetsblog as a New York City reporter at the start of 2010. When he was a kid, he collected subway paraphernalia in a Vignelli-map shoebox. Before coming to Streetsblog, he blogged at TheCityFix DC and worked as a field organizer for the Obama campaign in Toledo, Ohio. Noah graduated from Yale University, where he wrote his senior thesis on the class politics of transportation reform in New York City. He lives in Morningside Heights.

Read More:

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog New York City

‘Predictable’: Manhattan Mom Struck by Driving Scofflaw Wants Known Super Speeders off the Road

April 9, 2026

Need To Kill Cross Bronx Widening Plan Is Obvious Amid Slight Congestion Pricing Pollution Uptick

April 9, 2026

Brooklyn, Manhattan DAs Back Hochul on ‘Stop Super Speeders’

April 9, 2026

Thursday’s Headlines: March (Parking) Madness Trophy Ceremony Edition

April 9, 2026

DOT Launches Delivery Worker Training And Puts Apps On Notice

April 8, 2026
See all posts