Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In

Consider this an open thread on Robert Sullivan's piece in the Times' City section this weekend, and his four suggestions for better cyclist PR.

The question of how cyclists should use the road is often framed as a classic chicken-or-egg situation: Which comes first, streets that accommodate cyclists' needs or cyclists who use the streets courteously? I was glad to read a piece that takes the measure of how far New York City has progressed in each respect, but it's too bad the Times ran it with a headline and above-the-fold photo that don't match the intent of the story. Minimizing internecine conflict in any discussion about the ethics of cycling is already tough. The phrase "The Wild Bunch" doesn't exactly move the conversation forward.

Sullivan's four suggestions are posted after the jump.

NO. 1: How about we stop at major intersections? Especially wherethere are school crossing guards, or disabled people crossing, or a lotof people during the morning or evening rush. (I have the law with meon this one.) At minor intersections, on far-from-trafficintersections, let’s at least stop and go.

NO. 2: How about weride with traffic as opposed to the wrong way on a one-way street? Iknow the idea of being told which way to go drives many bikers bonkers.That stuff is for cars, they say. I consider one-way streets anathema --they make for faster car traffic and more difficult crossings. Butwhenever I see something bad happen to a biker, it's when the biker isriding the wrong way on a one-way street.

There will becaveats. Perhaps your wife is about to go into labor and you take herto the hospital on your bike; then, yes, sure, go the wrong way in theone-way bike lane. We can handle caveats. We are bikers.

NO. 3:How about we stay off the sidewalks? Why are bikers so incensed whenthe police hand out tickets for this? I'm only guessing, but eachsidewalk biker must believe that he or she, out of all New York bikers,is the exception, the one careful biker, which is a very car way ofthinking.

NO. 4: How about we signal? Again, I hear thelaughter, but the bike gods gave us hands to ring bells and to signalturns. Think of the possible complications: Many of the bikers behindyou are wearing headphones, and the family in the minivan has a DisneyDVD playing so loudly that it’s rattling your 30-pound Kryptonitechain. Let them know what you are thinking so that you can go onbreathing as well as thinking.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

World Day of Remembrance: ‘My Brother Did Not Die in Vain’

A drunk driver killed Kevin Cruickshank while he was biking in New York City. The movement for safer streets showed me that my brother did not die in vain.

November 16, 2025

World Day of Remembrance: The Fight to ‘Stop Super Speeders’ Has Gone National

The bills would require the worst of the worst drivers to at least adhere to the speed limit, which is not too much to ask.

November 16, 2025

Council Members Put Everything But Riders First at ‘Bus Oversight’ Hearing

The Council spent its last bus oversight hearing of its term asking the MTA and city to pull back on bus lane enforcement.

November 14, 2025

Community Board Defies Parents in Vote to Reopen Forest Park to Cars

The Parks Department appears to have given in to a vocal group of Queens drivers. Paging Mayor Mamdani!

November 14, 2025

Opinion: Daylighting Isn’t Anti-Driver — It’s Pro-Common Sense

Listen to a Republican: "The Department of Transportation's negative report on daylighting is like judging the effectiveness of lifeboats on the Titanic by studying the ones that never left the ship."

November 14, 2025

Friday’s Headlines: More Agenda Items Edition

Transportation Alternatives laid out, in 85 chunky bullet points, what the next major should do. Plus other news.

November 14, 2025
See all posts