Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In

Consider this an open thread on Robert Sullivan's piece in the Times' City section this weekend, and his four suggestions for better cyclist PR.

The question of how cyclists should use the road is often framed as a classic chicken-or-egg situation: Which comes first, streets that accommodate cyclists' needs or cyclists who use the streets courteously? I was glad to read a piece that takes the measure of how far New York City has progressed in each respect, but it's too bad the Times ran it with a headline and above-the-fold photo that don't match the intent of the story. Minimizing internecine conflict in any discussion about the ethics of cycling is already tough. The phrase "The Wild Bunch" doesn't exactly move the conversation forward.

Sullivan's four suggestions are posted after the jump.

NO. 1: How about we stop at major intersections? Especially wherethere are school crossing guards, or disabled people crossing, or a lotof people during the morning or evening rush. (I have the law with meon this one.) At minor intersections, on far-from-trafficintersections, let’s at least stop and go.

NO. 2: How about weride with traffic as opposed to the wrong way on a one-way street? Iknow the idea of being told which way to go drives many bikers bonkers.That stuff is for cars, they say. I consider one-way streets anathema --they make for faster car traffic and more difficult crossings. Butwhenever I see something bad happen to a biker, it's when the biker isriding the wrong way on a one-way street.

There will becaveats. Perhaps your wife is about to go into labor and you take herto the hospital on your bike; then, yes, sure, go the wrong way in theone-way bike lane. We can handle caveats. We are bikers.

NO. 3:How about we stay off the sidewalks? Why are bikers so incensed whenthe police hand out tickets for this? I'm only guessing, but eachsidewalk biker must believe that he or she, out of all New York bikers,is the exception, the one careful biker, which is a very car way ofthinking.

NO. 4: How about we signal? Again, I hear thelaughter, but the bike gods gave us hands to ring bells and to signalturns. Think of the possible complications: Many of the bikers behindyou are wearing headphones, and the family in the minivan has a DisneyDVD playing so loudly that it’s rattling your 30-pound Kryptonitechain. Let them know what you are thinking so that you can go onbreathing as well as thinking.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Friday Video: Amtrak Is Way More Successful Than You Think

Why do so many people still treat Amtrak as a failure — and what would it take to deliver the rail investment that American riders deserve?

October 24, 2025

Hundreds of Community Groups — From the Conservatives to the Socialists! — Demand Daylighting

Two hundred New York City groups from across the ideological spectrum joined calls to ban parking at corners in order to improve safety and visibility, also known as daylighting.

October 24, 2025

OPINION: Canal Street — Not The Vendors — Is the Problem

If Zohran Mamdani becomes mayor — and is true to his vision for a fair, livable city — he will have to take on this long-ignored corridor. Here's how.

October 24, 2025

Vision Zero Cities: Bicycles Are Not Cars So They Shouldn’t Have to Follow the Same Rules

The default in nearly all states is to impose the same traffic rules on bicycles as on motor vehicles even though the needs of cyclists are so different.

October 24, 2025

Friday’s Headlines: Today’s the Day Edition

Mayor Adams's new 15 mph speed limit is officially goes into effect today. Plus more news.

October 24, 2025

Cough, Cough: DEP Considers Largest Ever Exemption Request to City’s Anti-Idling Law

Academy Bus claims no technological alternatives exist for heating and cooling buses without idling. Advocates warn an exemption would "gut" the city's 50-year-old idling ban.

October 23, 2025
See all posts