Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In

Consider this an open thread on Robert Sullivan's piece in the Times' City section this weekend, and his four suggestions for better cyclist PR.

The question of how cyclists should use the road is often framed as a classic chicken-or-egg situation: Which comes first, streets that accommodate cyclists' needs or cyclists who use the streets courteously? I was glad to read a piece that takes the measure of how far New York City has progressed in each respect, but it's too bad the Times ran it with a headline and above-the-fold photo that don't match the intent of the story. Minimizing internecine conflict in any discussion about the ethics of cycling is already tough. The phrase "The Wild Bunch" doesn't exactly move the conversation forward.

Sullivan's four suggestions are posted after the jump.

NO. 1: How about we stop at major intersections? Especially wherethere are school crossing guards, or disabled people crossing, or a lotof people during the morning or evening rush. (I have the law with meon this one.) At minor intersections, on far-from-trafficintersections, let’s at least stop and go.

NO. 2: How about weride with traffic as opposed to the wrong way on a one-way street? Iknow the idea of being told which way to go drives many bikers bonkers.That stuff is for cars, they say. I consider one-way streets anathema --they make for faster car traffic and more difficult crossings. Butwhenever I see something bad happen to a biker, it's when the biker isriding the wrong way on a one-way street.

There will becaveats. Perhaps your wife is about to go into labor and you take herto the hospital on your bike; then, yes, sure, go the wrong way in theone-way bike lane. We can handle caveats. We are bikers.

NO. 3:How about we stay off the sidewalks? Why are bikers so incensed whenthe police hand out tickets for this? I'm only guessing, but eachsidewalk biker must believe that he or she, out of all New York bikers,is the exception, the one careful biker, which is a very car way ofthinking.

NO. 4: How about we signal? Again, I hear thelaughter, but the bike gods gave us hands to ring bells and to signalturns. Think of the possible complications: Many of the bikers behindyou are wearing headphones, and the family in the minivan has a DisneyDVD playing so loudly that it’s rattling your 30-pound Kryptonitechain. Let them know what you are thinking so that you can go onbreathing as well as thinking.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Kirsten Gillibrand Trots Out Bogus FDNY ‘Toxins’ in Quest to Weaken Congestion Pricing

Gillibrand's solution to potential toxins in the subway is more automobile toxins in the air.

February 4, 2025

Memo to Mayor Adams: Reliable Buses Start with You

Congestion pricing’s success and legacy depends on improving bus service. Mayor Adams must act.

February 4, 2025

Toyota Attacking Sustainable Transportation (Even More Than You Think)

The world's largest automaker has been ramping up spending to put climate change deniers in Congress, and crushing support for all kinds of sustainable modes in the process.

February 4, 2025

A Child Went For a Walk on a Rural Highway Alone. His Mom Got Arrested For It.

Should parents — or the state? — be liable when their children walk on dangerous roads?

February 4, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines: Is Congestion Pricing Finally … Popular?

Earth to President Trump: Don't cancel congestion pricing! Plus other news.

February 4, 2025
See all posts