Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
City Council

Council Repeals Decade-Old Law that Stalled Bike Lane Installation

The City Council repealed a notorious. out-dated law that imposed lengthy delays on the city before it could break ground on new bike lanes.

Photo: John McCarten/NYC Council Media Unit|

Council Member Lincoln Restler banished the ghost of Lew Fidler with the new law.

They’re putting the pedal to the metal. 

The City Council on Wednesday passed a historic bill to speed up the installation of bike lanes across the five boroughs by repealing a notorious, decade-plus-old law that imposed lengthy delays before the city could break ground on such projects — a momentous shift amid what’s expected to be the deadliest year for cyclists since before the millennium, said the bill’s main sponsor.

“No other transportation project in New York City, no bus lane or otherwise, requires this type of extended dead period when you cannot move forward on projects that are supported by our communities,” said Council Member Lincoln Restler (D-Williamsburg) following the Transportation Committee seven-to-five vote to move the legislation to the full Council.

"It’s worth noting that 2023 is on track to be the deadliest year for cyclists in New York in decades. It doesn’t make sense."

The full Council passed the bill by a vote of 32 to 15, with most of the opposition coming from outer-borough reps opposed to bike lanes or, more accurately, reducing the local community board's role in thwarting them.

The legislation voids an old law that required the Department of Transportation to give the local panels 90 days of notice before installing a bike lane, and then waiting another 45 days after a community board hearing to install the bike lane.

Under Restler's bill, bike lane proposals will move on the same timeline as other street projects that go in front of community boards, allowing the department to install a bike lane just 14 days after notifying the civic panel. Community boards will still have the opportunity to give feedback and request an in-person presentation by DOT.

The administration said back in April that it supported the bill, Intro. 417, which was first introduced by Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso in 2021. The late-Lew Fidler, a Council member representing swaths of southern Brooklyn, pushed for the original law that slowed down installation on the grounds that bike lanes were so controversial that they should undergo more review. 

But times have changed, with New Yorkers now making more than 550,000 bike trips every single day, often on unprotected roads. Manhattan City Council Member Keith Powers said that "2023 is sadly on track to be the deadliest year in decades for cyclists, underscoring the need for a cohesive network of bike lanes across New York City.”

“Unfortunately, current rules mean that bike lanes are often stuck in unnecessary red tape that delays their construction by months or even years. Intro. 417 will significantly streamline the approval process and I am happy to support its passage," he added.

Restler’s bill was first scheduled for a vote last month but was tabled at the eleventh hour as opponents attempted to turn supporters against the bill.

One change to come out of the delay was a specific the notification requirement for bike lanes “of any length” in the amended version. The first iteration would have exempted bile lanes less than 1,000 feet or four blocks, as well as unprotected bike lanes, from requiring any notice at all.

Bill sponsor Restler still views it as a win.

“There had been a previous draft that had allowed for shorter bike lanes to move forward without that notice, and in the end, this was a modification we made that helped the bill get it over the finish line,” he said.

“I'm happy that we’re moving the bill forward. I think in totality this was a good piece of legislation and will help us build and install more bike lanes.”

And a spokesperson for DOT said the agency will review how the bill impacts operations, but that "bike lanes are life-saving infrastructure that improve safety for everyone—including pedestrians and drivers."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Congestion Pricing Is Cutting Traffic Jams In New York AND New Jersey: Research

Travelers in Manhattan's central business district — and even those far beyond it — have gotten back tens of thousands of hours thanks to fewer traffic jams.

June 18, 2025

BREAKING: Judge Halts Mayor’s Plan to Tear Out Bedford Av. Bike Lane

And now the city will have to persuade a judge that officials weren't acting "arbitrarily, capriciously, and illegally" in ordering the hasty removal.

June 18, 2025

Small ‘Wonder’: Delivery Workers Protest Deactivations By New Food App Power Player

More than 50 delivery workers have had their accounts deactivated by Grubhub in the past two weeks — and they're blaming the company's new owner, a booming new player called Wonder. 

June 18, 2025

Dismissed: Another Judge Throws out Another Congestion Pricing Suit

Yet another anti-congestion pricing lawsuit was thrown out today, after a state Supreme Court justice spiked a lawsuit brought by the Town of Hempstead.

June 18, 2025

Albany Reauthorizes City Speed Camera Program for 5 More Years

It's one of few victories for the street safety movement this session: speed cameras remain in place.

June 18, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines: Full Court Press Edition

What a day: Brad Lander — arrested by ICE! Safe streets advocates sue the city! A Manhattan judge throws out a lame suburban congestion pricing lawsuit. And there's more.

June 18, 2025
See all posts