Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Pedestrian safety

The Problem With Treating Pedestrians Like Drivers

After U.S. DOT released a report earlier this month on pedestrian safety, media outlets around the country raced to produce indictments of "drunk walking."

"Drunk Walking Leads to Pedestrian Fatalities," exclaimed Tulsa's News on 6, as if people on foot have the same responsibility to be sober as people operating fast, heavy machinery. "Among pedestrians aged 25- to 34-years-old who were killed, half were alcohol-impaired," wrote the Cleveland Plain Dealer's Alison Grant, applying the same 0.8 percent blood-alcohol standard that's used to measure driving impairment. These articles stop just short of saying a legal prohibition on "drunk walking" is the next logical step.

Applying the same behavioral standards to walking that we attach to driving is a creeping trend. The New York Times has ruminated on the "dangers of distracted walking." In California a new Senate resolution encourages education in "defensive walking and biking" as a response to pedestrian fatalities among children.

It may be tempting to use driving terms to frame discussions about pedestrian safety because driving is, in many places, the default mode of transportation in the U.S. But there's a problem with simply assigning the responsibilities that come with driving -- like being sober, not texting -- to walking. Walking is a right, not a revocable privilege like driving.

Kids walk. Blind people walk. People with poor judgment walk. That's not going to change, and we shouldn't pretend it can or will. Texting while walking, or trying to cross the street with 0.9 percent blood alcohol content should not put people at risk of an early death.

Pedestrian deaths are a systemic problem, and the problem isn't that people are texting, or drunk, or not being defensive enough. Pedestrians aren't, in themselves, doing anything dangerous, at least until you add cars to the equation.

The core problem is that it isn't safe for people to walk. In too many places, this is because we've designed intersections like high-stakes obstacle courses for people on foot. We allow people to drive at potentially fatal speeds in pedestrian-rich areas. And now we're talking about pedestrian deaths in a way that equates walking with driving. That's how a report about 4,000 pedestrian deaths each year could be framed as an indictment of "drunk walking."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Live from New York (State), It’s Wednesday Night!

Hallelujah, congestion pricing now getting big laughs in Albany.

May 23, 2025

Friday Video: A Deep Dive on the Endless Debate Over Bike Helmets

Everything you need to know the next time someone asks you if you're "for" or "against" bike helmets.

May 23, 2025

Friday’s Headlines: John Mulaney, You Are Officially On Notice Edition

When did Netflix start airing community board meetings? Plus other news.

May 23, 2025

Assembly Member Ditches Her Car — and Discovers The Good Side of Albany

"I love Albany now," says the Greenpoint lawmaker, who ditched her car. Will others follow? Well, Gov. Hochul offered a start...

May 22, 2025

Public Demands Safer West Side Highway at Packed Workshop

Seemingly all in attendance agreed that the existing bike and pedestrian path isn't cutting it and ought to be expanded.

May 22, 2025
See all posts