Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Streetsblog

New Jersey Gets It Wrong on Parking Lot Privatization

10:49 AM EST on December 14, 2010

We'd all like to see parking prices raised to reflect the demand for parking and the real costs associated with maintaining parking infrastructure, or -- better yet -- the elimination of much of the surface parking that overruns cities, making them less walkable and transit friendly.

So the idea of parking lot privatization -- theoretically moving from a public subsidy for car storage to a market orientation -- has promise. Of course, how it performs in practice depends on how the deal is structured.

The state of New Jersey is considering a privatization scheme for its transit station parking lots that would involve leasing the lots to private operators. Unfortunately, the state's plan looks like a model of how not to structure a public-private partnership, say Stephen Smith at Market Urbanism and Matt Yglesias at Think Progress.

false

Smith says the lessees will have limited control to set prices and the very arrangement will prevent development of the valuable land:

[R]ather than taking on entrenched suburban interests, we’re just adding another layer of government dependents, this time of the monied corporate variety (bidders include KKR, Morgan Stanley, Carlyle, and JP Morgan). The land on which transit parking lots sit is uniquely positioned to be converted into dense development, and the only thing worse than sitting on the land would be for the agencies to sign away their rights to change that within the foreseeable future.

Yglesias says an outright sale of the parking lots to private investors would be preferable, allowing their conversion to more productive uses, like housing:

Today’s privately owned parking lot could be tomorrow’s transit-oriented development. And today’s publicly owned parking lot could be sold to a private owner. But a parking lot that’s publicly owned but contracted out to a private operator is the worst of both worlds—a kind of publicly guaranteed, contractually obligated subsidy to parking and parking-lot operation.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Activists in Portland are campaigning to make streetcar tracks safer for cyclists, reports Bike Portland. Decatur Metro compares the energy consumption of various modes of transport, plus their intangible benefits. And TheCityFix outlines ways planners can influence the public to make good decisions on behalf of sustainability and community cohesion.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Serious Crash in Greenpoint Again Reveals Flaws in City Design, Enforcement Against Reckless Drivers

A woman was seriously injured — and is clinging to life — because a driver with a long record of recklessness slammed into her on a Greenpoint Street as she came home with milk.

February 22, 2024

POWER PLAY: City Moves to Put Thousands More E-Car Chargers on the Sidewalk

We should stop and think before giving over curbside space to car drivers, a mistake the city made in the 1950s.

February 22, 2024

Bill to Cut Vehicle Miles in New York Would Also Reduce Traffic Deaths, Costs and Pollution

"As this data makes clear, a new approach will not only protect our climate, but also make New York a safer, more affordable place to live," said state Sen. Andrew Gounardes.

February 22, 2024

Thursday’s Headlines: Celebrate What’s Good About Our City Edition

It's now less than one week til the annual "Public Space Awards" on Thursday. Get your tickets now. Plus other news.

February 22, 2024

Underhill Ave. Still In Limbo Two Weeks After Mayor Promised Decision in ‘A Day Or So’

The mayor's perception of time differs from that of mere mortals, but he did say on Feb. 5 that he would decide "in a day or so." It's been two weeks.

February 21, 2024
See all posts