Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Streetsblog

Bike Boxes Stoke Motorist Resentment in Seattle

Changes to the street often have a way of irritating people who were accustomed to the way things used to be, but sometimes it's surprising how seemingly minor changes can set off an angry response. In Seattle, the city's installation of bike boxes -- painted street markings that let cyclists advance to the front of an intersection and make safer turns when red lights turn green -- has prompted complaints from those who think the road belongs to the users with the most horsepower.

false

Erica C. Barnett of Network blog Publicola reports on her recent appearance on KOMO radio, where the subject of the segment was "the war on cars":

Perhaps even more than “road diets,” which replace driving lanes with bike lanes and add a turn lane for cars, the bike boxes have brought out anti-bike, pro-car contingent, which argues that it’s unfair to make drivers wait for cyclists at red lights.

From the cyclist’s point of view, of course, this is an asinine argument. First, the primary point of bike boxes is to make cyclists more visible to drivers. When drivers hit cyclists—and yes, cyclists do frequently get hit in right-hook accidents by inattentive drivers—the inevitable refrain is, “I didn’t see her!” Bike boxes make drivers more likely to see us.

Second, cyclists already have the right to block cars in traffic. If I’m first at a traffic light, I’m allowed to take the lane—there’s no law obligating me to scoot over when a car comes up behind me, any more than a driver is required to pull out of the way to let a car behind him pass.

Third, and most importantly: It isn’t logically consistent to argue that cyclists should have to follow the rules of the road (AKA, act like a car) and that cyclists should have to get out of the way the instant a driver shows up on the scene. If you want me to ride on the right side, obey traffic laws, stop at stop lights, and stay off the sidewalk, it makes no sense to say I should move to the side—i.e., act like a pedestrian—the second I keep someone in a car from turning right.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Kaid Benfield at NRDC's Switchboard takes a stand against massive urban demolitions in shrinking cities. The Rails to Trails Conservancy reports $580 million has been cut from bicycle and pedestrian projects nationally due to rescissions. And World Changing ponders the future of the city of Seattle from the perspective of sustainability.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

SEE IT! Two Women and a Baby Struck and Injured by a Driver in Brooklyn

Pedestrians aren't even safe in this city when they have the light and they're in a crosswalk and they see a driver coming right at them and try to get out of his way.

January 2, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines: The Start of Something Big Edition

We start every new year with such optimism! And we do so again as 2025 kicks off. Plus other news.

January 2, 2025

Happy New Year from Streetsblog!

We're off today nursing our hangovers from the good news of the immanent commencement of congestion pricing. But we'll see you on Thursday!

January 1, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines: A Great Day for Congestion Pricing Just as 2024 Ends

Congestion pricing is saved! And by a Jersey judge, no less! Plus other news as we enter the last day of the year.

December 31, 2024

Scooter Use is Soaring From Bronx to Queens: Report

It's a mobility revolution that flies in the face of ongoing resistance from Queens elected officials who have called for the city-overseen program to be scraped.

December 31, 2024
See all posts