Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Bridge Tolls

Komanoff: MTA’s Three-Day Blitz on Toll Scofflaws is Not Nearly Enough

It’s awesome that a three-day sting nabbed 44 autos that had racked up $922,500 in unpaid bridge tolls and fines, but the agency needs to do more.

Photo: Streetsblog Photoshop Desk

Memo to MTA: Brag less, bag more.

Yes, it’s awesome that in a three-day sting last week, Metropolitan Transportation Authority cops nabbed 44 autos that combined had racked up $922,500 in unpaid Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge tolls and fines.

Welcome though they are, it's worth noting that those tolls and fines comprise less than the tolls evaded on all MTA bridges and tunnels every three days!

Yes, based on MTA data, every three days in 2022, the Authority lost out on nearly $1.3 million in toll revenue owed by non-paying vehicle owners on its nine crossings. That revenue loss is 40 percent more than the $922,500 in tolls (and, importantly, the much larger fines that are levied when drivers don't pay the toll) that the MTA says were racked up by the 44 vehicles it stopped on the Verrazzano last week. 

How can that be? Do the math:

  • In 2022, the MTA collected $2,332,380,000 at its toll crossings (source: Stantec Consulting Services, “Appendix E: History and Projections of Traffic, Toll Revenues and Expenses and Review of Physical Conditions of the Facilities of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority,” April 28, 2023, Table 6.)
  • That year, the MTA reported at the Nov. 29 Bridges & Tunnels Committee meeting that its “toll revenue collection rate” is 93.7 percent.
  • That makes the uncollected 2022 revenue $156,800,000 (calculated by multiplying the first dollar figure by the reciprocal of the collection percentage less one).
  • Then take that number and divide it by 365 to get the per-day figure and then multiply by three to get the three-day sum, and the result is $1,290,000.
  • And that $1,290,000 is 40 percent more than $922,500 (and that's not even taking into account that the $922,500 includes fees, not just tolls).

So, MTA bridge toll evasion is rampant. Why should we care? Two big reasons:

First, toll evasion is pinching our public transportation. Every dollar of surplus MTA toll revenue goes directly to the region’s public transit providers: 50 percent to NYC Transit, 25 percent each to Metro-North and the Long Island Rail Road. Last year’s $156.8 million in uncollected tolls thus represent $78 million-plus denied to NYCT and $39 million each missed by the commuter rail lines — money that could have paid for more frequent train service.

Second, and more urgent, toll avoidance by area motorists threatens to undermine congestion pricing. For each 1 percent of non-paying private cars and trucks, congestion revenues will shrink by $10 million. The difference between a “nominal” 2-percent non-paying share and, say, the 2022 average 6.3-percent rate, is more than $40 million in annual revenue that won’t be available to fund transit improvements.

But consider this, too: congestion pricing is a novel concept here. Unlike tolls on MTA bridges and tunnels, a fee to drive into Manhattan south of 60th Street isn’t a means of recouping a capital outlay for a bridge or tunnel. Rather, it’s a means to offset (or “internalize”) externality costs caused by driving into a chronically over-subscribed network of streets and roads, and, in so doing, to dissuade a minority of motorists from undertaking those vehicle trips.

Any such innovative policy depends on a modicum of social cohesion. A 2-percent rate of toll avoidance is manageably low, as MTA chair Janno Lieber intimated when discussing the enforcement blitz with reporters. In contrast, the 6.3-percent average rate from late 2021 into most of 2022 practically invites law-abiding motorists to go rogue.

Just such a slippery slope is evident on subways and especially buses, as MTA detractors and congestion pricing opponents never tire of pointing out, highlighting what they deem a half-a-billion dollars or more in lost transit revenues from fare-beating. Of course, those tropes overstate the revenue losses by ignoring that many fare-beaten trips wouldn’t be made at all if they weren’t “free.”

Congestion pricing is a different beast. The public will gain whether car trips to the zone continue (which generates revenue) or not (which cuts traffic congestion). But this outcome depends on drivers actually facing the toll.

So, let's go, Janno. Make sure the big toll-evader bust isn't a three-hit wonder.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Friday’s Headlines: Hochul’s Fantasy World Edition

The governor has gone off the deep end. Plus other news.

July 19, 2024

Speaker Adams: Council May Not Use its ‘Sammy’s Law’ Power to Lower Speed Limits

The Council may not lower the speed limit, even though it fought so hard to get that very right from the state legislature.

July 19, 2024

Parks Dept. Has Money But No Timeline to Finish Eastern Queens Greenway

There's tens of millions of dollars for the greenway, so when will parks build it?

July 19, 2024

Thursday’s Headlines: Paris is a Lot Cooler than NYC Edition

The City of Light has figured out how to reduce the heat island effect. Plus other news in today's daily digest.

July 18, 2024

Exclusive: Legal Team Announced for Suit Against Hochul’s Congestion Pricing ‘Pause’

Attorneys from three firms have inked a joint defense agreement to fight "the governor’s illegal decision to cancel congestion pricing," Comptroller Brad Lander said.

July 17, 2024
See all posts