Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Coronavirus Crisis

Mayor Says He is ‘Concerned’ About Restaurant Dining Areas that Drivers Can’t See Through

Pedestrians are endangered by dining areas that are not transparent. Photo: Gersh Kuntzman

It's our December donation drive. Your gift helps us do these kinds of important stories. So please click here.
It's our December donation drive. Your gift helps us do these kinds of important stories. So please click here.

It's a setback setback.

The winter weather doesn't only mean less daylight, but also less daylighting at corners with restaurants operating on the curbside as many eateries are using heavy, opaque materials to allow patrons to dine in relative warmth — but creating dangerous conditions for pedestrians and cyclists because car drivers can no longer see through the outdoor dining structures.

When asked about it by Streetsblog on Monday, the mayor said he's concerned.

"I'm really glad you're raising it because I am a Vision Zero believer, and I'm also an outdoor dining believer — it has been amazing step forward for the city, but it has to be safe," he said when asked if the city is cracking down on dining areas that cut off view corridors for drivers even though the structures remain set back from the corner, per city rules.

"We do need to make sure that we've done that piece, right," he added. "We got to keep everyone safe while we're also trying to protect people's livelihoods and give people a real sense of this city able to recover soon."

Streetsblog's question came only after the Department of Transportation declined to provide suitable information regarding whether the agency is cracking down on the use of opaque materials, such as wood or heavy canvas (see examples below).

Officially, the DOT said only that "many" restaurants have been told to move their dining areas away from the crosswalk, but the agency did not say how "many" nor did it address the issue of opaque restaurant side walls. The "winter" dining brochure that is handed to all eateries [PDF] oddly does not say anything about the transparency of the restaurant walls. The program's original requirement that the restaurant must leave eight feet of daylighting remains in force.

That's not good enough, said Lisa Orman of StreetopiaUWS.

"This is yet another indication that the DOT lacks the organizational structure or capability to know what's happening on each and every block," she said. "If they had a framework for public space management and engagement, interfacing with businesses on these life-saving rules and regulations would happen in a much more robust way. We can't fight for life and limb-saving changes to our streets, such as daylighting intersections, and then have that work erased by Open Streets: Restaurants."

Orman did not blame the restaurant owners, who "have so much to deal with right now," but said the DOT needs to create clear guidelines for, well, clear sightlines.

"The structures absolutely need transparent sides," she said. "Many of the restaurants we see on the UWS are almost completely enclosed with wood paneling on the sides. They are impossible to see through for all road users."

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Council Pols Fume as NYPD Disputes Report of Racial Bias in Traffic Enforcement

"Like stop-and-frisk, the NYPD uses traffic stops as a tool to harass and humiliate Black and brown men and these stops often spiral into police brutality," said one expert.

April 29, 2025

Subway Ridership Keeps Rising Despite Sean Duffy’s Best Efforts

It's like an old Catskills joke: No one rides the subway anymore — it's too crowded.

April 29, 2025

City’s Transportation Vision for Brooklyn Marine Terminal is ‘Big,’ But Locals Want Bigger

A busway, pedestrian-first blocks, and a longer greenway are on the table. But a residents-only shuttle? That's a non-starter, some say.

April 29, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines: Ivy Day in the Committee Room

Here's our recap of a wacky public safety committee hearing. Plus other news.

April 29, 2025

League of What Now? ‘Conservation’ Group’s Endorsement Criteria Are Bizarre

How could a venerable environmental group endorse a candidate who was a "no" on City of Yes and lukewarm on congestion pricing?

April 28, 2025
See all posts