Lower East Side ‘Resiliency’ Plan Hits New Potholes

More demands for an independent review of proposal that digs up a park and endangers cyclists while sparing a highway.

A rendering from the city's East Side Coastal Resiliency plan shows the East River waterfront. The plan has evoked controversy among local residents for proposing to close the park for nearly four years.
A rendering from the city's East Side Coastal Resiliency plan shows the East River waterfront. The plan has evoked controversy among local residents for proposing to close the park for nearly four years.

Lower East Side elected officials are joining local residents and the Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer in demanding an independent review for a controversial, $1.45-billion city project to raise the Lower East Side’s coastline in order to protect it from climate-change-related storm surges.

State Senator Brad Hoylman, Assembly Member Harvey Epstein, and Reps. Nydia Velazquez and Carolyn Maloney are urging that the city appoint a panel of experts to review the East Side Coastal Resiliency Project, which would dig up the East River Park for almost four years and dislocate thousands of bike commuters who use its greenway bike route — all while sparing the adjacent FDR Drive during construction. 

Epstein told Streetsblog that the city must ensure that its plan includes “viable and safe alternatives for everyone”  because the park — in addition to providing vital greenspace in a crowded neighborhood — “serves as an important route for many New Yorkers that bike.”

That view was seconded by representatives of the cycling community.

“The city is treating the FDR Drive as this sacred thing and leaving it untouched, while closing the park and treating it as disposable, when for residents the park is sacred. Its priorities are out of whack,” Tom DeVito, the senior director of advocacy for Transportation Alternatives, told Streetsblog. “It unacceptable to shut down the park and divert thousands of  bike commuters without any reasonable alternatives.”

DeVito added that the city’s suggested alternative routes of First and Second Avenues are “too far away” for the displaced bike commuters.

Sophie Maerowitz, a safe-streets activist who lives at 14th Street and Avenue C and uses the greenway to get to work, said that she is “incredibly concerned about how the plan will affect the East Side’s access to green space overall, but as a bike commuter down East River park daily, I’m especially upset about losing my daily car-free ride.”

“I’m going to be faced with an unprotected route to work after a year that has proved deadly for cyclists,” added Maerowitz, referring to the 15 cyclists who have been killed in traffic violence so far this year, up from 10 who died all of last year.

According to the Department of Transportation, the greenway carried 2,077 cyclists on weekdays and 1,974 cyclists on weekends during daylight hours in 2018, numbers that were expected to rise by 5 percent annually.

Others evoked the specter of boondoggle projects of yore in arguing for an independent review.

“We don’t want a ‘Big Dig’ and we don’t want another Westway,” Hoylman said at a public hearing on the project on July 17 convened by Brewer. 

Hoylman was referring to a Boston Harbor tunnel project that went way overtime and over-budget, and an environmentally destructive 1970s plan to extend the West Side Highway, which failed in federal court. “We have a lot of questions, and we don’t have a lot of answers,” Hoylman said, pleading for an “independent, community-based monitor” for the East Side project.

The demand for review may gain the support of the Manhattan Borough Board, which will vote on the resiliency plan on Tuesday as part of the city’s Uniform Land Use Review Procedure.

Even if the plan passes the land-use review processes, the hearing at Mount Sinai-Beth Israel Medical Center showed that its introduction is proving to be a public-relations disaster for the de Blasio administration. Two administration officials who presented an update on the proposal at the hearing — Jamie Torres Springer of the Department of Design and Construction, and Alyssa Cobb Konon of the Parks Department — sat stone-faced as dozens of residents condemned the plan and demanded that the city keep open sections of the park during construction. No one from the community spoke in favor of the plan.

Torres Springer drew shouts of “Boo!” and “No!” from the packed hall when he announced that the city had rejected Brewer’s bid to extend review of the plan by two months and would instead only hold open the public-comment period by two weeks. “Sixty days! Sixty days!” the crowd chanted angrily.

Lower East Side resident Howard Brandstein speaks out against the East Side Coastal resiliency Project at a public hearing on July 17 convened by Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer.
Lower East Side resident Howard Brandstein speaks out against the East Side Coastal Resiliency Project at a public hearing on July 17 convened by Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer.

Residents who packed the hearing complained that the plan replaces one that would have added acreage to the park by decking over the FDR — identifying the six-lane behemoth as a hated symbol of the very climate change the plan is supposed to ameliorate. Indeed, cheers greeted comments by resident Howard Brandstein, who proposed to rid the FDR of cars by devoting several lanes to electric buses. Residents also worried about the effects on health, the environment, and emergency preparedness posed by the long construction. And the greenway bike path was never far from mind.

“The city seems to have forgotten that there are more than one kind of cyclist,” resident Clara Weiss said, disapproving of the scheme because its proposed bike route seemed tailored only for abled cyclists and “would be right next to the FDR, with all its polluting fumes.”

The demand for an independent review comes in the wake of a request by Hoylman, Epstein, Maloney and Velazquez that the city study ways to install life-saving protected bike lanes on Avenues A, B, C, or D in order to serve the cyclists displaced from the greenway.

  • Resident

    The de Blasio administration would rather see the city sink into the ocean than touch car lanes and parking. It’s a crime against New York’s future.

  • ItsEasyBeingGreen

    Is there anything on the table to improve this park for cycling after all this work is done? The present mixed-use path isn’t good enough but the Department of Parks and Recreation has an awful track record when it comes to designing separated cycling and walking paths. They simply do not know how to do it.

    This would be an awful missed opportunity.

  • This plan is straight out of the 1980s

  • Stephen Hanrahan

    I don’t like how this article paints this project as an attack on cyclists. I was at the meeting and I felt it was another NIMBY community bent on delaying a project because they were too wrapped up in the short term consequences and not the long term outcomes. I think this plan is awesome, I think the LES will get MORE park space, MORE greenways, including all important bridges and connections to get on/off the greenway, and protection against predicted sea level rise for 100 years! This meeting wasn’t about bicycles or deblasio unlike this article makes it seem. It was about losing sentimental and valuable park space for 4 years which is devastating. I can’t imagine not having access to my local park for 4 years. The best thing this meeting brought up was that the construction should be prioritized in stages so that the LES can have access to the parts that are finished or not being worked on yet.

    However, I think to delay this project because of worries over 4 years of construction for 100 years of amazing parkland is not the way to go. I hope this project doesn’t get derailed by NIMBYism and lack of foresight, and it continues. But it definitely wasn’t about cycling as this article makes it seem.

  • Vooch

    If not building the LOMAX superhighway through Lower Manhattan is now universally viewed as a brilliant success, then why shouldn’t removing FDR drive be likewise considered brilliant ?

    The FDR drive was a mistake and a atrocity equal to the LOMAX

    Remove FDR drive and replace with the pre-existing street grid.

  • Geck

    The plan diagrams and photos would seem so include a clear bike path mostly along side the FDR but sometimes within the park and it includes a flyover at the dreaded Con Ed pinch point. More reporting confirming this would be helpful.

  • ItsEasyBeingGreen

    The ones I see here seem to indicate that there’s only going to be a shared path: https://ny.curbed.com/2018/9/28/17915352/east-side-resiliency-project-park-plans-updated

  • BadHombre

    The FDR Drive will see plenty of construction and lane closures during the project, just not next to the park. As part of the plan there’re going to be flood gates that can be extended across the highway.

  • cjstephens

    This is why “community input” is so over-rated. The highway needs to be rebuilt, and instead of talking about either a) ways to mitigate the disruption to local park users and greenway commuters or b) ways to mitigate the damage the highway has done to human access to the river we get… a rant about electric buses? Seriously? I’m OK with electric vehicles in theory, and I guess, sure, buses could end up running electric, but that’s so far removed from what DOT needs to get done right now. I’m sure the electric bus advocate means well, but please, this isn’t the time or the place for that. It just makes the “community” look like a bunch of cranks.

  • GimmeGimmeGimme

    I can’t think of anything better than diverting all the easily flowing traffic onto stop-and-go City streets, where, while they idle, the autos will leave more CO2 for the park trees to purify. Had the APGW crowd not lost its mind, they would certainly have called for continuing the expressway to prevent the heavy FDR traffic spilling into their dilapidated neighborhood.

  • ItsEasyBeingGreen

    Traffic is a dependent variable, roads are an independent one.


DOT Makes the Case for Bike Routes Parallel to W. Houston St.

Last Tuesday night Ryan Russo and Josh Benson from the Department of Transportation presented a plan to Manhattan’s Community Board 2 to create a safer east-west bike route across Lower Manhattan. With three cyclists having been killed on Houston Street over the last two years and major reconstruction of the street currently underway, members of […]