TransAlt to City: Give Us a ‘Bike Mayor’ Like London

We need a bike mayor, Transportation Alternative says. Photo: Transport for London
We need a bike mayor, Transportation Alternative says. Photo: Transport for London

The city of London has a bike and pedestrian commissioner who reports directly to the mayor — and a booming population that cycles on an ever-widening network of protected lanes and highways. Why don’t we have that?

That’s the basic question behind a new petition drive by Transportation Alternatives that calls on Mayor de Blasio to  appoint the city’s first-ever “Bike Mayor” to champion cycling across multiple agencies of the city bureaucracy.

“There is no better time than now to appoint a Bike Mayor in New York City: the protected bike lane network is not growing fast enough to keep up with demand, an influx of people on two wheels is coming with the expansion of Citi Bike and impending legalization of e-bikes and scooters, and, just one week into 2019, two people have been killed while biking [and] last year, two cyclists were killed while riding in unprotected bike lanes,” the group said in a statement. “These are the sort of threats that cyclists fear, yet non-cyclists would not know to think — and much less worry — about. It is unique dangers like these that make the need for a Bike Mayor all the more urgent.”

London’s Walking and Cycling Commissioner position was created in 2013 as a part-time, three-day-a-week post, according to Janine Rasiah of the London city government. New Mayor Sadiq Khan named Will Norman to the position — and then made the post full-time, “recognizing the scale and importance of the job,” Rasiah told Streetsblog. Norman is paid $125,000 per year (albeit in British pounds).

Since the creation of the bike commissioner, cycling in London has expanded and now represents around 2.5 percent of all journeys in London, roughly 730,000 a day, Rasiah said. In New York, cycling represents just 1 percent of trips.

Sydney, Mexico City, São Paulo and Amsterdam also have “bike mayors.” (Streetsblog has previously asked City Hall for a comment about creating such a position and been rebuffed.)

“It’s clear that people who ride bikes in the five boroughs are not well-represented in city government,” said former Amsterdam bike mayor Anna Luten, who now lives in New York. “A Bike Mayor in New York would be instrumental for making it safer to ride a bike, which will lead to more people on bikes, less congestion and a smoother ride for everyone.”

Amsterdam’s world class bike network “would not have been possible” if that city had not made a strong commitment to making sure “people on bikes … had a voice in the administration,” Luten added.

An estimated 1.6 million New Yorkers ride a bike at least once a month — a population that itself would be the fifth biggest city in the country, TransAlt pointed out.

Ellen McDermott
Ellen McDermott

The TransAlt petition drive comes amid frustration that the city’s bike network is not growing fast enough. Last year, the city installed roughly 17 miles of protected bike lanes, down from nearly 25 the year before. Mayor de Blasio has resisted a call by Council Member Ydanis Rodriguez to build 100 miles of protected lanes every year.

“Although the city has led an impressive expansion of the bike lane network over the last few years, there are still too many streets that repel would-be riders because they lack safe space for people on bikes,” said TA’s co-interim director Ellen McDermott, who recently penned a Streetsblog op-ed about her fears of riding in city traffic. “A ‘Bike Mayor’ would be instrumental in bringing safe bike accommodations to more neighborhoods, and could help advance the Vision Zero Street Design Standard, which would speed up the growth of the protected bike lane network by syncing street redesigns with repaving projects.”

  • Why doesn’t TA just get the major city bike advocacy groups together and name their own unofficial bike mayor for now? I wouldn’t wait for de Blasio’s permission on filling a role that won’t have any executive power anyway.

  • Joe R.

    The mayor could do a lot of good things if he wanted to, even if they were unpopular. He’s a lame duck, so no worries about reelection. And he’s gone about as far as he’s ever going politically. He lacks the broad appeal to run for governor or President. Basically, when his term is up he’ll likely be returning to private life. Might as well end it on a good note doing what needs to be done. A good start would be eliminating parking placards.

  • Altered Beast ✓ᵛᵉʳᶦᶠᶦᵉᵈ

    wasn’t “Mr. Brexit” Boris Johnson the bike mayor?

  • Maggie

    I’m very much in favor of this. One of my most discouraging takeaways from the mayor’s weird press answers on the crush-loaded pedestrian/bike shared space over the holidays, was that Bill de Blasio has apparently farmed out his decisions on these issues to NYPD. I definitely didn’t vote for that! It seems completely inappropriate and highly alarming.

    Someone needs to be raising the issue of, basically, not making such boneheaded decisions again and again. If we have a taxpayer-funded parking ticket fixer (I feel nauseous every time I contemplate this!) and a nightlife mayor, then yep, we’re way behind the curve on having a cycling advocate, or ombudsman, at city level.

  • Trevor Sullivan

    No, he was the Mayor of the City of London (a position basically chosen by a council of inner-city corporations in a process that doesn’t even pretend to be democratic)

  • George Joseph Lane

    Trevor, you’re even more wrong that Altered Beast.

    Boris Johnson was the democratically elected mayor of the Greater London Authority. The City of London has a Lord Mayor, not a Mayor. Boris Johnson is/was colloquially known as the bike Mayor as he started many of the Cycle Superhighways and introduced the ‘Boris Bikes’, a docked cycle sharing system. The role referred to in the article as the ‘bike mayor’ is usually calling the ‘walking and cycling czar’ here in London.

  • linstur

    A great way to expand bike lanes is to charge for parking across the city (especially Manhattan). There are 1.8 million free parking spots – 200 sq feet each of prime real estate – that doesn’t even pay property taxes. Why do we allow millions of tons of personal property to sit on our streets for free? If we charged $5.50 per night on half the spots, it would raise $3 billion/year per UCLA prof Donald Shoup – $ that could make transit cheaper and nudge cars out of NYC permanently. Cars are Mayor De Blasio’s “vision gap” – he can’t bring himself to see that cars ARE the problem: traffic, climate change, noise, accidents, danger, stress, eyesores & expense. He subtly or overtly resists helping bike lanes, Citi Bike, scooters, congestion pricing, tolls on bridges – it’s almost like at heart he wants NYC to be the suburbs — an SUV for everyone. The math doesn’t work – everyone can’t have an SUV because then every street will be a parking lot and we will melt the planet. Getting rid of cars in cities is the *only* way out of this global mess – and NYC could do it easily if someone just had the vision.


New York Post Bike Bile: Deliberate Lies or Pure Ineptitude?

It’s getting to the point — probably well past the point, actually — where the non-stop cyclist hate spewing from the New York Post has attained a level of self-parody. So free of fact and full of bald-faced vitriol is the paper’s latest editorial, praising Ray Kelly’s NYPD for a marked increase in cyclist summonses, […]