Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Jamaica

State’s Top Court: Low-Cost Parking Is Not a Tax-Free Charity

The owner of five Queens cut-rate parking facilities will have to pay property taxes, the state's top court has ruled. The New York State Court of Appeals upheld the city's decision to take back a tax exemption it had previously granted the politically-connected non-profit that operates 2,000 parking spaces in downtown Jamaica.

Photo: Google Street View
The politically connected non-profit operator of discount parking garages in Jamaica will have to pay property taxes, the state's top court ruled. Photo: Google Street View
Photo: Google Street View

Over the course of a decade starting in 1996, Jamaica First Parking LLC, a subsidiary of the Greater Jamaica Development Corporation (GJDC), purchased parking garages and lots in downtown Jamaica from the city. The GJDC board, which includes former Congressman Rev. Floyd Flake, is well connected to much of the political establishment in southeast Queens.

In 2007, the city's Finance Department said Jamaica First's parking garages would be exempt from property taxes because they serve a "charitable" purpose under the law. Daily News columnist Juan Gonzalez smelled something fishy in late 2010, and the city reversed its property tax exemption just months later.

GJDC then sued the city for taking back the property tax giveaway. The case ultimately went to the Court of Appeals, the state's highest court, which on July 1 ruled 5-2 that the non-profit will have to pay property taxes for its public parking lots [PDF].

While the court didn't question the wisdom of below-market parking garage construction as an economic development strategy, it was clear that the court didn't buy the argument that operating public parking is related to non-profit charitable work.

"We disagree with petitioners' assertion that the parking facilities are charitable in and of themselves because they fulfill the primary purpose of economic development," wrote Judge Eugene Pigott for the majority. "While these goals may be laudable, they are not charitable."

"We’re waiting for the lawyers to review the decision so we can figure out how to move ahead,” GJDC spokesman Bob Liff told the Press of Southeast Queens. “If this means they have to pay property tax, it is our job to figure out how much that is."

GJDC now owes at least $2.7 million in back taxes, a de Blasio administration spokesperson told the paper.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

STATUS NO: DOT Backs Off Southern Brooklyn Bike Network

Safety be damned — another bike lane project is on hold.

September 10, 2025

A ‘Deliverista’ Speaks: I Work for Instacart — And I Support the City’s Minimum Pay Rate

"We will never accept being undervalued and unsafe on the streets of this city," he said.

September 10, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines: Congestion Pricing Works, Part 541 Edition

The latest evidence that the toll to drive into the transit-rich part of Manhattan is working. Plus other news.

September 10, 2025

KOMANOFF: Data Show South Bronx Isn’t Seeing Increased Traffic from Congestion Pricing

The central business district toll did not lead to a traffic influx in the South Bronx, our columnist reveals.

September 9, 2025

Opinion: Let’s Put a Real Busway on Atlantic Avenue

Yes, everyone is talking about the city's busway plans for Flatbush Avenue, but Brooklyn’s true corridor for bus rapid transit is its east-west spine.

September 9, 2025
See all posts