CB 10 Delays Vote on Fourth Avenue Safety Plan Until October

Fourth Avenue in Bay Ridge will still have high rates of speeding after Community Board 10's vote to delay a safety plan approved by its transportation committee. Photo: ##https://maps.google.com/?ll=40.629002,-74.021716&spn=0.010129,0.015171&t=m&z=16&layer=c&cbll=40.629081,-74.025781&panoid=VD5fPqHYrQFWEXuepdcqbw&cbp=13,186.45,,0,8.05##Google Maps##

After months of working with DOT and local residents on a traffic calming safety plan for Fourth Avenue in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn Community Board 10 voted last night, 25-11, to delay a decision on the project. The vote effectively rules out the installation of safety treatments on the avenue this year; if the board votes in favor of the plan in October, the project could be installed next spring.

Five pedestrians were killed on Fourth Avenue in Bay Ridge between 2006 and 2013, according to DOT, with two of those fatalities occurring in April of this year. Transportation Alternatives clocked drivers on Fourth Avenue at an average of 37 mph, with some measured traveling as fast as 60 mph, in a report released yesterday about the extent of speeding in Brooklyn. To reduce speeding, the plan would put Fourth Avenue on a road diet in both directions from Ovington Avenue to 86th Street, and on northbound Fourth Avenue from 101st Street to 95th Street, converting the street from two lanes in each direction to one through lane plus left-turn lanes.

Before last night’s vote, DOT had hosted workshops with community board members, including open houses in February and March, a community forum with full board members on June 5, and a transportation committee meeting last week, where resolutions supporting the proposal (except for a pedestrian island and fence at 86th Street) advanced to the full board.

But the board decided to delay the plan after many members said they had trouble understanding its details. “There was a lot to the Department of Transpotation proposal,” district manager Josephine Beckmann told Streetsblog, noting that it covers more than 30 blocks.

As DOT received feedback on the plan, it modified the proposal, but this responsiveness may have been hard for some board members to keep up with. “There was a lot of criticism that DOT kept changing the plan after each meeting,” CB 10 transportation committee member Bob HuDock told Streetsblog, noting the irony that not long ago, many board members were criticizing the agency for not being responsive enough.

“There was certainly ample opportunity and everybody was notified about every single meeting,” HuDock said, adding that many board members chose not to participate. “If we need to do a few more meetings, let’s do a few more meetings,” he said.

There will be at least two special full board meetings dedicated solely to Fourth Avenue in July and August, after which the plan will go to the board for final review in September before a vote in October and installation next spring, under a new mayor, at the earliest. Last night, CB 10 elected Brian Kieran as its next chair; he currently serves as chair of the transportation committee and will oversee the October vote on the Fourth Avenue plan.

“The committee’s done a lot of this work already,” said board member Andrew Gounardes, but he added that extending the timeline would help build consensus. “I don’t think most people are opposed,” he said. “I don’t think this is a setback, ultimately, with improving Fourth Avenue.”

Neighboring CB 7 voted last year to support a similar plan to reduce the number of lanes and calm traffic on Fourth Avenue in Sunset Park. CB 10’s decision to delay comes on the heels of CB 6’s rejection of a safety plan for its stretch of Fourth Avenue in Park Slope, though HuDock said the Park Slope decision did not come up during discussions in Bay Ridge last night.

DOT said it will continue to work with the community on Fourth Avenue. “This project reflects input by the local community to make a busy corridor safer for everyone. We look forward to discussing this further with the community,” spokesperson Nick Mosquera said in an e-mail.

Council Member Vincent Gentile welcomed the board’s decision to delay, saying that it shows “seriousness” about traffic safety. “I am confident that the full board will propose a comprehensive plan to the community that will help keep our neighbors safe. I look forward to a comprehensive plan this fall,” he said in a statement.

  • Daphna

    This is depressing. Bloomberg is only in office until the end of the year. Who knows what 2014 will bring in terms of a mayor and a Department of Transportation Commissioner. Instead of street improvements being offered, maintaining the status quo might be the new mode in 2014. Communities should be grabbing at these improvements while they are on the table and while there are the funds and political support. Now is not the time to dither about for months and months. They seem to have the attitude that this change will be available to them if and when they want it in the future, but that might not be the case.

    I hope the DOT goes ahead and implements all of the 4th Avenue changes even with Brooklyn CB6 against and even with CB10 postponing decision. They do have supportive votes from the Transportation Committees of both CB6 and CB10.

    Community Boards are advisory only. The State Liquor Authority treats them as such. I wish NYC DOT would too.

    The DOT set a good precedent when they twice went against Manhattan CB10 and installed the traffic calming on Adam Clayton Powell. Manhattan CB10 did not want the wider median, left turn bays, 1 less thru lane, narrower lanes, and pedestrian refuges installed from 118th to 155th Street on Adam Clayton Powell. The DOT installed a portion from 133rd to 155th Street anyway. Then Manhattan CB10 did not want the traffic calming extended. The DOT extended it anyway on Adam Clayton Powell down to 110th Street. It is a much better street now!!!!!!! Cheers to DOT. Jeers to Manhattan CB10.

  • 4th Ave Resident

    Delaying this decision demonstrates about as much “seriousness” about traffic safety as delaying chemotherapy demonstrates seriousness about treating cancer.

  • Daphna

    If Board members have trouble understanding the details of this plan, then either they are not trying to understand and are deliberately being obtuse, or if they really do not have the intelligence to understand then they should not be Board members and should not be in a place to make decisions for the wider community. They are affecting tens of thousands of people. These plans are not that complicated. Plus since community board members are volunteers and not professional street planners, they could decide to trust the professionals at the DOT even if they “had trouble understanding”.

  • Mark Walker

    As Daphna points out, CB votes on DOT projects are advisory only. Statistically, it is likely that delaying this project another year will cost at least one life. Failing to advise in a timely manner is tantamount to choosing not to advise. DOT should go ahead and save that life.

  • JamesR

    “Community Boards are advisory only. The State Liquor Authority treats them as such. I wish NYC DOT would too.”

    DOT does. CBs are advisory in the way that professional planning staff are advisory: their opinions are not binding but carry a high degree of weight for the actual decisionmakers.

    Be careful what you wish for. I’m addressing this to everyone reading this: you can’t tout CB votes in favor of projects you support if you’re going to also turn around and harangue them as paper tigers when they take a procedural action you don’t approve of.

    That said, I understand the frustration, because street safety situations like this really are about life and death.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

This Week: Safer Avenues in Brooklyn, Art Meets Transportation

|
The Streetsblog calendar kicks off the week with some important community meetings tonight. Get involved with selecting transportation projects for participatory budgeting in Brad Lander’s council district, or speak out in support of pedestrian safety on major thoroughfares in Bushwick and Bay Ridge. On Wednesday, Streetsblog Editor-in-Chief Ben Fried moderates a panel at the Old […]