Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Community Boards

DOT Moving Forward With Safety Plan for ACP Boulevard [Corrected]

Community Board 10 has yet to get behind the DOT plan to save lives on Adam Clayton Powell Boulevard. Image: NYC DOT

Safety improvements on deadly Adam Clayton Powell Boulevard could be in place by September, the New York Times reported yesterday, despite continued resistance to the redesign from the local community board.

Three people have been killed while walking on Adam Clayton Powell this year; 12 were killed by drivers since 2006. The road's wide, straight lanes lead motorists to approach highway speeds: the average speed after 8:00 p.m. is 50 miles per hour, according to the Department of Transportation.

Though Community Board 10 has repeatedly stated that it understands the seriousness of the safety problem along the corridor, it has for years opposed the most comprehensive proposals to fix Adam Clayton Powell. In 2009, CB 10 voted against a plan to add a buffered bike lane to the street. CB 10 opposition forced the road diet proposed for the street this time around to be shrunk to cover only half the distance initially proposed, and the board still hasn't signed on to the plan.

Breaking from its usual procedure, DOT is ready to move ahead with or without the community board's firm approval. Construction is set to begin in August, according to the Times, and last a month.

"We just don't understand it yet," transportation committee chair Deborah Gilliard said of the plan to extend medians and narrow traffic lanes. Instead, the Times reported that her committee wants to see "more left-turn traffic signals, 30-miles-per-hour speed-limit signs, and pedestrian crossing signals that give those on foot a head start."

Correction: This post originally ran under the headline "DOT Rejects CB 10 Suggestion for Incorrect Speed Limit Signs on ACP Blvd.," based on the New York Times report that the transportation committee wanted "35-miles-per-hour speed-limit signs." The Times has since corrected their piece to reflect that the paper mistakenly reported the speed limit, and the committee did not ask for 35 mph speed limit signs. Streetsblog has in turn corrected this post.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Republican Signs On To Super Speeder Bill, After Defending Reckless Driving

A Brooklyn politican who defended speeding at a funeral for victims of traffic violence now supports preventative legislation.

November 24, 2025

Money for Something: Uber is Driving The Race for City Council Speaker

What does Uber expect to receive in return for $250,000 in donations to two Council Speaker candidates?

November 24, 2025

‘The Permanence Agenda’: Paint and Plastic Won’t Deliver Real Street Safety

DOT’s quick-build approach to redesigning streets with paint and other temporary materials has worked well enough — but Mayor-elect Mamdani should aim for permanence.

November 24, 2025

Monday’s Headlines: Cartoon Bromance Edition

The president and the mayor were all smiles, but lots of Streetsbloggy topics were discussed in the Oval, as it turns out. Plus other news.

November 24, 2025

NIMBY-Mania: Middle Village Has a Love-Hate Relationship with the IBX

The idea of making it easier to reach Middle Village clearly put some Middle Villagers on edge.

November 23, 2025

Speaker Adams and DOT Are Eviscerating Daylighting Bill

Some are looking to the next mayor and Council to pass the life-saving measure.

November 21, 2025
See all posts