Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Community Boards

DOT Moving Forward With Safety Plan for ACP Boulevard [Corrected]

Community Board 10 has yet to get behind the DOT plan to save lives on Adam Clayton Powell Boulevard. Image: NYC DOT

Safety improvements on deadly Adam Clayton Powell Boulevard could be in place by September, the New York Times reported yesterday, despite continued resistance to the redesign from the local community board.

Three people have been killed while walking on Adam Clayton Powell this year; 12 were killed by drivers since 2006. The road's wide, straight lanes lead motorists to approach highway speeds: the average speed after 8:00 p.m. is 50 miles per hour, according to the Department of Transportation.

Though Community Board 10 has repeatedly stated that it understands the seriousness of the safety problem along the corridor, it has for years opposed the most comprehensive proposals to fix Adam Clayton Powell. In 2009, CB 10 voted against a plan to add a buffered bike lane to the street. CB 10 opposition forced the road diet proposed for the street this time around to be shrunk to cover only half the distance initially proposed, and the board still hasn't signed on to the plan.

Breaking from its usual procedure, DOT is ready to move ahead with or without the community board's firm approval. Construction is set to begin in August, according to the Times, and last a month.

"We just don't understand it yet," transportation committee chair Deborah Gilliard said of the plan to extend medians and narrow traffic lanes. Instead, the Times reported that her committee wants to see "more left-turn traffic signals, 30-miles-per-hour speed-limit signs, and pedestrian crossing signals that give those on foot a head start."

Correction: This post originally ran under the headline "DOT Rejects CB 10 Suggestion for Incorrect Speed Limit Signs on ACP Blvd.," based on the New York Times report that the transportation committee wanted "35-miles-per-hour speed-limit signs." The Times has since corrected their piece to reflect that the paper mistakenly reported the speed limit, and the committee did not ask for 35 mph speed limit signs. Streetsblog has in turn corrected this post.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

More Truck Routes Are Coming To A Street Near You

The DOT wants to rein in freight trucks by adding more than 45 miles to the city’s existing network of truck routes.

December 11, 2025

Van Driver Kills Cyclist on Riverside Drive: Cops

The victim was a philanthropist who was cycling up Riverside Drive in Washington Heights late Sunday.

December 11, 2025

Watchdog Wants Hochul To Nix Bus Lane Enforcement Freebies for MTA Drivers

Lawmakers think the bill prevents MTA employees from getting a "slap in the face" for doing their jobs, but it could open the door to abuse.

December 11, 2025

Upstate County’s New Bus Service Will Turn A Transit Desert Into A Rural Network

Jefferson County was one of the few counties in New York without a bus service. Now job seekers and students will have previously unfathomable options in their North Country communities.

December 11, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines: Speed Cameras Work Edition

A new study bolsters the city's program. Plus the hot stove has been extinguished for the Mets. And other news.

December 11, 2025

The Children of New York City Deserve Universal Daylighting

Daylighting is a moral imperative that protects the most vulnerable New Yorkers: children.

December 10, 2025
See all posts