Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In

In case you haven't heard, it's bike month, the time of year when lots of people are giving cycling a try for the first time, amidst much encouragement from advocates and city officials. But not from the Washington Post, which chose to mark the occasion by scolding cyclists.

false

In a Sunday editorial, the paper cited a mysterious 2004 study that showed that "cyclists were slightly more likely than motorists to be at fault in a crash." The writers went on to describe motorists who refuse to share the road as "churlish," while painting cyclists as reckless scofflaws who bring injury and death upon themselves.

What's next, WaPo? Kicking off Women's History Month by by blaming women for the pay gap?

The folks at TheWashCycle have been scratching their heads about this one and they've taken the time to write this rebuttal:

It all starts with the title, which online is "Bicyclists are welcome in DC, but they too should obey the law." Which is confusing as hell, because it seems there is some group who obeys the law that bicyclists can join. But I can't for the life of me figure out who that group is. A better title would be "Bicyclists are welcome in DC, but they alone should obey the law." In the paper version the title is "Sharing the Streets: Bicyclists welcome. But please obey the law." Which is better, but I could hardly see the same message aimed at any other group. It seems to be proposing the old quid pro quo - if you obey the law, you'll be welcome; which is a standard no one else is held to. If I break the law, then ticket me, but I have a right to the road and I don't need the paper to tell me I'm welcome to use it anymore than I need them to tell me I'm welcome to vote.

Has the Post ever written an editorial asking drivers to obey the law? And considering drivers kill 200 times as many people as cyclists do in DC, they're going to need to write articles like this about drivers once a week for four years just to balance it out.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Utility Cycling carries a detailed and thought-provoking history of Critical Mass. Bike San Diego comments on the League of American Bicyclists' new focus on educating motorists, as opposed to placing the onus of responsibility on cyclists. And Half-Mile Circles examines a model developed by the Brookings Institution for capturing the value created through transportation improvements.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

SEE IT! Two Women and a Baby Struck and Injured by a Driver in Brooklyn

Pedestrians aren't even safe in this city when they have the light and they're in a crosswalk and they see a driver coming right at them and try to get out of his way.

January 2, 2025

Thursday’s Headlines: The Start of Something Big Edition

We start every new year with such optimism! And we do so again as 2025 kicks off. Plus other news.

January 2, 2025

Happy New Year from Streetsblog!

We're off today nursing our hangovers from the good news of the immanent commencement of congestion pricing. But we'll see you on Thursday!

January 1, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines: A Great Day for Congestion Pricing Just as 2024 Ends

Congestion pricing is saved! And by a Jersey judge, no less! Plus other news as we enter the last day of the year.

December 31, 2024

Scooter Use is Soaring From Bronx to Queens: Report

It's a mobility revolution that flies in the face of ongoing resistance from Queens elected officials who have called for the city-overseen program to be scraped.

December 31, 2024
See all posts