Bending to East Side Traffic, DOT Limits Plan for Faster Buses, Safer Cycling

Not so long ago, it was common to hear NYCDOT staff say their job was “to keep the traffic moving.” Engineers working from “the motorist’s viewpoint” ran the show, much like they did in the 1950s. Those days are thankfully over. Today’s DOT prioritizes safety and sustainability and has compiled a lengthy track record of innovation in a few short years. But as the transportation committee of Manhattan Community Board 6 learned last night, the old emphasis on keeping the traffic moving still restrains how far the department will go to improve conditions for other modes.

Bus riders shouldn't have to sit in traffic across the Queensboro Bridge. Photo: _ via Flickr.
The crush of traffic using the free Queensboro Bridge is the limiting factor holding back DOT's plans for faster buses and safer streets. Photo: ## Coach/Flickr##

At the CB meeting, DOT presented plans to speed buses across the Queensboro Bridge and extend the bike lanes on First and Second Avenues from 34th Street to 57th Street. Those changes are underwhelming: mostly traffic signal tweaks for buses, and mostly shared lanes for cyclists.

In explaining why only minor tweaks will be employed to help Queensboro Bridge bus riders and why protected bike lanes won’t be built through Midtown, DOT officials made it clear that anything that slows traffic is off the table. When push comes to shove, in this case, DOT’s other goals are getting trumped by traffic. One can only imagine what might have been if Albany had enacted congestion pricing, easing the peak hour crush of cars on this free bridge.

The need for faster bus service across the Queensboro is pressing. During the evening rush, there are two buses crossing the bridge every minute. They spend their time in grinding traffic, however. From 5:00 to 6:00 p.m., buses travel at only 12.2 miles per hour. That speeds up to 21.2 mph just an hour later.

Eric Beaton, the director of transit development at DOT, defined the department’s goal for the project as increasing bus speeds “without having too much of an impact on the many cars and other people that use the bridge.”

The limits of that approach quickly became clear. One of the four improvements proposed would grant eastbound buses at 57th Street and Third Avenue heading onto the bridge a leading green light so that they can merge from the right side of the street to the left. The buses would get their green during an already-installed leading pedestrian interval at the intersection. “We’re not taking any green away from cars,” promised Beaton.

DOT's plan will improve bus reliability by reducing conflicts between traffic exiting the bridge and the Q60, as buses turn from 60th Street onto Second Avenue at the beginning of the route.

The other modifications are equally minor. When the Q60 needs to turn left from 60th Street onto Second Avenue, for example, it will get a short leading interval so that it can get a head start and avoid conflicts with traffic exiting the bridge. Again, said Beaton, the change wouldn’t slow the traffic pouring off the Queensboro.

The bus stop where the Q60 sits before making that turn will also be lengthened. A rerouted Q101 will be able to avoid an extra half-mile loop it currently makes by sharing that longer bus stop with the Q60.

On the Queens side, one signal change will give buses a head start turning onto Van Dam from Thomson, and another will improve safety for cyclists approaching the bridge but won't improve bus speeds.

On the Queens side of the bridge, buses turning right from Thomson onto Van Dam will get a little bit of extra time, which will come during an existing left-turn phase. During the evening rush, 100 express buses will take advantage of this signal change.

The final piece of the Queensboro package is a worthy safety project, but it will actually slow buses slightly. At Queens Plaza North, buses turning onto the bridge have to cross the new bike lane, and both currently get a green light at the same time. DOT plans to grant the cyclists a ten second “leading bike interval” so they can get out into the intersection and be visible to bus drivers. That’s good for safety, but doesn’t help bus speeds.

When asked how much time these improvements would save bus riders, Beaton admitted “it’s relatively small amounts.” Instead, he said, the changes would mainly improve reliability by preventing the very worst delays.

Added Ted Orosz, the director of long range bus planning for New York City Transit, “Even if it only saves two minutes, it’s saving two minutes at the most important spot.” If the Q60 gets delayed at the very beginning of its route in Manhattan, for example, “you’re going to get uneven boarding all the way to Jamaica,” and even worse bus bunching.

The kind of change that’s really needed to make buses go faster — dedicated lanes free from the crush of traffic — only earned the promise of further study, including further traffic analysis. That’s despite the fact that exclusive bus lanes were the top suggestion of both local and express bus riders in a DOT survey. According to Beaton, DOT is considering a reversible bus lane — taking space from traffic heading in the off-peak direction — adding though “it takes a lot of work to move the poles every day,” and funding would need to be found to do so.

Creating a bus or carpool lane across the Queensboro Bridge was a promise in the original PlaNYC, and DOT’s proposal for providing buses with priority treatment over the bridge was supposed to be revealed last November. The specific promise of a dedicated lane on the Queensboro was removed in PlaNYC 2.0, replaced with a pledge to “improve bus priority.”

In CB 6’s discussion of the First and Second Avenue bike lanes, it became equally clear that bike infrastructure had been sacrificed to keep cars moving. “There’s extremely heavy traffic in this area,” said DOT bike and pedestrian director Josh Benson. “We need all five lanes for cars.”

Members of the community were quick to point out that extremely heavy traffic doesn’t have to necessitate leaving out bike lanes, depending on your goals. “That same lot of traffic that makes you concerned about cars makes me feel like I’m putting my life at risk,” said Flannery Denny, a cyclist who lives on the Lower East Side and works on the Upper East Side. “Biking to work is absolutely not an option for me.”

The disappointment of DOT’s justification for the lack of high-quality bike facilities in Midtown was only heightened by seeing the agency’s stats on the success of the bike lanes downtown. If the new separated bike lanes and pedestrian refuge islands cut injuries by 17 percent, wouldn’t it be worth extending them north? Benson also pointed out that bike volumes on First and Second at 50th Street are almost exactly as high as they were in the East Village before the installation of the protected lanes, implying that the bump in ridership could be similar.

DOT said that buffered bike lanes instead of shared lanes in Midtown are still on the table, but they are asking for a strong CB 6 statement of support. CB 6 did call for buffered lanes in its resolution last year, but Benson said that “we didn’t really feel like we got strong support of that proposal.” He said DOT reverted to its original proposal of shared lanes “in the interest of keeping the project moving,” suggesting DOT is extremely spooked about the possibility of further opposition to its bike program.

Committee chair Fred Arcaro put off discussion of the bike lanes and a vote until a later meeting, despite — or perhaps because of — the standing room only crowd who had come specifically to talk about that issue. Arcaro has limited discussion and been accused of mismanaging the community board’s procedures to work against livable streets projects before.

Last night, bus riders and bike riders saw DOT unwilling to improve their trips if it means slowing Midtown traffic at all. That suggests one more reason congestion pricing or bridge tolls are so necessary. If high traffic volumes mean DOT won’t fight for street safety or efficient transit, high traffic volumes have to go.

  • Anonymous

    “DOT said that buffered bike lanes instead of shared lanes in Midtown are still on the table, but they are asking for a strong CB 6 statement of support.”

    Seems like it is time to contact CB 6 and make yourself heard and to come out to their meetings.

  • krstrois

    Ugh, this is quite depressing. The only reason I don’t ride to see family on the UES is the lack of protected bike infrastructure. It’s just too crazy on those streets. I’d love to be able to ride my son uptown.

    Sure, it might be a nightmare for a short while, but if they limit car lanes, won’t fewer people drive? And won’t they then need fewer lanes for driving? My husband and I do have a car in the city and First Ave is one of the few places where it’s still relatively easy to drive. Make it harder, DOT, and you won’t need five lanes for traffic. You’ll solve your own problems. This is obvious stuff and they know it, so I think this is all about politics.

    That makes me wish that they had begun the second phase of buffered east side bike lanes in E. Harlem and worked south– the tabloid press and local news wouldn’t even have noticed the changes since they don’t care about uptown neighborhoods and the neighborhood would have received what it wants and deserves. And then it would have just been logical to connect the two protected lanes.

  • Steve Nuozzo

    “In explaining why only minor tweaks will be employed to help Queensboro Bridge bus riders and why protected bike lanes won’t be built through Midtown, DOT officials made it clear that anything that slows traffic is off the table.”

    So is the DOT saying that bike lanes cause traffic? That’s contrary to all the evidence so far and seems like the kind of off-handed statement that could come back to haunt the department if they revisit the plan.

  • “There’s extremely heavy traffic in this area,” said DOT bike and pedestrian director Josh Benson. “We need all five lanes for cars.”

    You know, there’s a threshold of tolerance related to traffic. If you make it more difficult for all that traffic to flow, it will naturally decrease to a rate that is considered acceptable to a driver over time. Taking a lane out might make things a bit worse on said street for car traffic, and taking 3 lanes away may create some traffic jams for a certain amount of tim, but it will never get to the point of intolerable because the usage of that street would decrease. It may even dip far enough down at a very near point in time that traffic would seem light, but as soon as this is realized it will again fill up with cars to an accepted level by travelers.

    Then again, if you take all the lanes away, there would be NO traffic. Funny how this all works.

  • Td

    “”According to Beaton, DOT is considering a reversible bus lane — taking space from traffic heading in the off-peak direction — adding though “it takes a lot of work to move the poles every day,” and funding would need to be found to do so.”

    Hey dummy, speeding up buses would mean you could have the same throughput with fewer buses.

  • Bolwerk – Delancey Street as God intended (circa 1919). It really looks like a third world dump today, in comparison.

  • Albert

    “‘it takes a lot of work to move the poles every day,’ and funding would need to be found to do so.”

    I know where to get the funding! I know where to get the funding! Use the guys who are now wasting their time moving the barriers that let cars into Central Park 5 days a week.

  • Larry Littlefield

    As for First and Second Avenues, they are extremely important bus routes and truck routes to Midtown and Downtown from the north. Recall that the FDR Drive and Henry Hudson Parkway do not permit trucks.

    For bikes, therefore, the push should be to complete the East Side Greenway. And for a route with intermediate access, how about turning Park Avenue into a Bicycle Boulevard limited to bicycles and local motor vehicle traffic all the way up? It is already the route I ride to Midtown, in preference to First and Second Avenues. Slower traffic, fewer trucks.

  • meb

    DOT – I’ve got a solution for you. Make the bus lanes on 1st and 2nd a shared bike/bus lane. The buses pull out of that lane most of the time in midtown east and the UES anyway. Not the best solution in the world, but if buses and bikes can share the N4 bus lane out of Dublin toward the west we can do it here in NY. If you can’t do that, fix up the greenway and Central Park and make them usable for east side cyclists.

    I take Metro North into 125th or GCT and I work on the UES. I often take the East Side Greenway because 2nd is a deathtrap these days. The East Side Greenway has sink holes that’ll swallow your bike south of 121st St (down a bit). It’s not ideal and in nicer weather it’s better just to use the greenway in the early hours when it’s less busy.

    NYCDOT, your East Side plans are a real let down. And this is coming from a former long time Queens resident, we’re used to the city letting us down.

  • moocow

    I think you are right, it’s a lack of “political capital”. DoT doesn’t want to anger the drivers -who don’t live there for anyway. I wonder if NYPD’s reluctance to enforce any laws but the one for light running cyclists, is hampering street design. Box blockers etc, have nothing to fear clogging the streets there. DoT seems to be on it’s own in facilitating the through traffic.

  • carma

    Im going to have to disagree with the bike/bus shared lane. Getting smacked by a 2 ton car is bad. Imagine getting smacked by a 20 ton bus??? Not very pretty at all

    While traffic volumes may be lower on an exclusive bike lane, by having the DOT mark the bus lane for shared use, you are explicitly saying that all cyclists should/must use the bike/shared lane. Sure, cyclists use the bus lanes now already b/c it has lower traffic volumes, but those users are doing so at their own risk.

    Now, if you have a whole bunch of non-experienced cyclists use a DOT approved bike/bus lane, an lets say they get hit by a bus, i can smell lawsuit and additional hate for bikes.

  • Ian Dutton

    Rather than allowing lengthy discussion of the shortcomings of DOT’s proposal, the committee chair asked that people email their comments regarding First and Second Avenue bike lanes to the CB office at:

    I suggest that all the commenters on this thread and other interested parties take their well-reasoned arguments there! Really! Please!

  • Actually, that’s not really a solution at all. Just because Dublin does it doesn’t mean NY should. Copy the best; don’t just copy everything.


This Week: Safer Biking at Qboro Bridge, Faster 125th St. Buses

There are a lot of community board meetings on the Streetsblog calendar this week where you can lend your support to livable streets projects, including an important one tonight about safety improvements near the Manhattan Side of the Queensboro Bridge. Later this week, there’s also a Democratic mayoral candidate forum in Brooklyn where you can […]

Riders Want Faster Buses Across Q’Boro. Are Bus Lanes Coming?

NYC DOT is studying how to speed buses across the car-clogged Queensboro Bridge, and data the agency collected over the summer [PDF] show just how great the need is. Buses are crawling and riders are fed up. Relieving the bottleneck for riders could make transit a far more attractive option for Queens residents. One potential […]