Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Bicycling

What the Feds Giveth, the States Taketh Away — From Bike/Ped Programs

It’s rescission time again, folks. That Washington lingo for “gimme gimme.” We had a name for people who “rescinded” gifts back in elementary school but it’s ethnically insensitive so I won’t say it. Suffice it to say, if little kids call you a name for doing something, it’s probably not a super popular thing to be doing.

false

The FY2011 budget deal that Democrats and Republican finally agreed to recently requires states to send back to Washington $2.5 billion in unspent transportation funds. Who decides what programs to target for rescissions? Your state DOT.

Darren Flusche of League of American Bicyclists wrote this on the League’s blog:

Historically, some of the strongest programs for bicycle and pedestrian projects – Transportation Enhancements (TE), Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) – suffer dramatically higher rescission rates than other programs.

For example, TE and CMAQ made up just 7.3 percent of a state DOT’s 2010 transportation apportionments, but they made up a much larger share of what a state sends back. In August 2010, out of the $2.2 billion rescinded, $968 million (44 percent) came from CMAQ and TE. Not all these funds would have gone to bicycling and walking, of course, but based on historic spending rates, some $330 million would have.

Flusche said that one reason that states often disproportionately target bike and ped projects for rescission is that they often spend those dollars slower than highway dollars – so come rescission time, when DOTs are looking around for unspent funds, they pull from bike projects they hadn’t started yet.

I asked RIDOT Director Michael Lewis what his state was going to rescind this time around. He said (as of this morning) they hadn’t decided yet, but “it shouldn’t have a real negative effect on our program.” He said they try to take rescission money from areas where it would have “the least impact on our needs,” so they won’t be taking from high-priority areas like “bridge rehabilitation and roadway reconstruction.” Lewis didn’t mention where transit and non-motorized modes fit into that.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Double-Wide Bike Lanes Coming to Sixth Ave. in Midtown

The city starts to claim the space dividend now that congestion pricing is reducing car traffic.

February 26, 2025

‘Complete Streets’ Webpage Falls Prey To Trump Purge

Some basic technical resources were housed on a single government website that was scrubbed shortly after Trump's inauguration. Now, advocates are scrambling.

February 26, 2025

‘City of … Sort Of’: How Do The ‘Outer Transit Zone’ Parking Mandate Reductions Work?

The City Council's ultimate approval of Mayor Adams’s "City of Yes" rezoning was political meat-grinding at its best, but somewhat tasty in the end.

February 26, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines: Congestion Pricing Makes Us Safer Edition

Crashes are down nearly 20 percent in the congestion relief zone compared to last year. Plus more news.

February 26, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines: Car-ruption on Staten Island Edition

Patriotism? Scott LoBaido proves that a scoundrel can also cling to the corruptive influence of car culture. Plus other news.

February 25, 2025
See all posts