Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Streetsblog

Could Restructuring the Gas Tax Fund the Transportation Bill?

Would a major change to the national gas tax stand a chance after tomorrow's election?

Perhaps so, but not without postponing one of President Obama's key priorities, according to a recent story in the Wall Street Journal. Apparently, state DOTs have been pitching a proposal to Republicans and Democrats to change the structure of the gas tax instead of ending the Bush tax cuts on high earners. By converting the gas tax from today's 18.4 cents per gallon rate into a percentage of sales, it is hoped, the government could gradually increase revenues without imposing an immediate tax increase.

false

This would be a significant departure from current policy when it comes to fuel taxes. Since 1993, the gas tax has been held at 18.4 cents. If the rate had been increased to match inflation, today it would be 27.8 cents, according to Josh Barro at Real Clear Markets.

Sean Roche at Network blog Newton Streets and Sidewalks agrees with the impulse to restructure the gas tax, but says the proposal may not go far enough to bring fuel taxes in line with infrastructure spending:

Adoption of an ad valorem gas tax would be a step in the right direction. "Spending on road construction and maintenance grew almost exactly in line with the economy from 1994 to 2008 - a 102 percent increase." As a consequence, "federal, state and local governments grew road spending faster than road revenues by borrowing more and by diverting general tax revenues to spend on roads."

Ultimately, though, simply stemming the backward march of gas-tax revenue is not enough. We need to make up lost ground. We need to account for the impact of increased fuel economy. And, we need to capture more of the costs of driving from those who drive (or consume goods that have been shipped). One of the virtues of switching to an ad valorem gas tax, though, is that it has no immediate impact, but preps for the future.

It's just math. Federal and state gas taxes are too low.

Elsewhere on the Network today: Lets Go Ride a Bike asks whether aggressive urban cycling guides alienate women and other potential new cyclists. Ecocity Publicity Mobility examines Copenhagen's policy of gradually replacing car parking spaces with bike parking. And WashCycle says that before condemning cyclists for "bad behavior," critics should examine whether safe alternatives are available.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

Speaker Adams and DOT Are Eviscerating Daylighting Bill

Some are looking to the next mayor and Council to pass the life-saving measure.

November 21, 2025

Memo to Mamdani: Fifth Ave. Belongs to the People — Not the Ultra-Wealthy and Gridlock

Mayor-elect Mamdani should revive DOT's plan to transform Fifth Avenue — which Bill de Blasio and Eric Adams shelved at the behest of powerful business interests.

November 21, 2025

‘Dirty and Embarrassing’: Jim McGreevey Fights Street Safety in Jersey City Mayoral Run

All eyes are on the Garden State's second city, where a former governor plots a comeback with a divisive, anti-safety campaign.

November 21, 2025

Cutting Federal Transit Funding Won’t Close Budget Gaps — But Will Make Transportation Less Affordable

The Trump administration's proposal to eliminate the mass transit account of the Highway Trust Fund would be short-sighted, ineffective, and ruinous, a new analysis finds.

November 21, 2025

Friday Video: A New Urbanist Heard From

Joel Katuala is "pissed off" about the criminal crackdown on cyclists.

November 21, 2025

Friday’s Headlines: Chi-Town Edition

Things are tense between Zohran Mamdani and Chi Ossé. Plus some other news.

November 21, 2025
See all posts