Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Andrew Lanza

State Sen. Andrew Lanza Defends Stance on MTA Rescue

lanza.jpg

State Senator Andrew Lanza called this afternoon in response to yesterday's post about his MTA rescue stance. He first took issue with the characterization of Senate Republicans as "refusing to budge" on a transit funding plan, saying that his conference has effectively been shut out of the process. "If they wanted to come forward with an MTA rescue package," he said of the Democratic leadership, "there's not a thing a Republican can do."

I agreed that the Democratic majority shoulders most of the responsibility for the current impasse, but when I suggested that he could have stepped forward to support the Ravitch plan, Lanza disputed the implication that he should be asked to support a pre-existing solution and reiterated his opposition to a payroll tax.

We had a long exchange about the root of the MTA's financial troubles, which I'll try to summarize as concisely as possible with minimal editorial comment.

He started by claiming that his criticism of the MTA is "not just bashing."

"The MTA comes forward every year almost in shock as to their budget
situation," he said. "They have proven that
they don't have a handle on their own finances." I argued that this was due mainly to the volatility of their current revenue streams, which the Ravitch plan would help to address.

Lanza rebutted with a call for transparency and accountability. "They do not present documents in a way according
to generally accepted accounting principles," he said. "A rescue plan means that taxpayers pony up. I think it's fair to ask,
"What are you doing with the money?'" (I'm not a CPA, but the Deloitte and Touche staffers who went over the most recent MTA financial statement available online [page 3 of this PDF] say that their review, while not rising to the level of an audit, found it to be "in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.")

I asked about the imminent downgrading of the MTA's bond rating. That's going to cost taxpayers -- and they'll only get higher debt payments out of it, not better transit service -- so why not incorporate any transparency reform into the plan itself, instead of holding a rescue hostage to the precondition of a forensic audit? Lanza suggested that this would delay the changes he wants to see. "We always say transparency and accountability would be nice, but we never do anything about it."

What stuck with me more than anything was Lanza's criticism of the Democratic leadership. By blaming Republicans, he said, "all they're looking for is political cover." Fair enough, but is anyone in Albany looking for something better?

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

ALERT: GOP Moves to ‘Permanently’ Cut Reconnecting Communities Funding

The House Transportation Committee wants to slash funding for one of America's most critical equity-focused grant programs — unless advocates speak out and get them to reverse course.

April 30, 2025

Wednesday’s Headlines: Duffy on Day 100 Edition

"Good Day New York" co-host Curt Menefee doesn't buy Sean Duffy's arguments against congestion pricing. Plus more news.

April 30, 2025

Arboricide! City Quietly Axes Street Tree Requests

Here's a tree-mendous piece of bad news. Not to mention, the agency closed out requests on Earth Day of all days.

April 30, 2025

Council Member Yusef Salaam Throws Support Behind Albany Push To Rein In Speeding Drivers

Council Member Yusef Salaam is using his lived experience to move towards the ultimate North Star of street safety: holding repeatedly reckless drivers accountable.

April 30, 2025

Council Pols Fume as NYPD Disputes Report of Racial Bias in Traffic Enforcement

"Like stop-and-frisk, the NYPD uses traffic stops as a tool to harass and humiliate Black and brown men and these stops often spiral into police brutality," said one expert.

April 29, 2025
See all posts