Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Congestion Pricing

Silver and Assembly Dems Defend Their “Democratic” Process

In the latest New York Observer, Azi Paybarah talks to state legislators and other insiders about how the congestion pricing non-vote went down on Monday. Conclusion: Assembly Democrats told Speaker Sheldon Silver what to do, not the other way around. And by killing the pricing bill behind closed doors, the thinking goes, the Democratic conference rightfully exerted its power. 

The way the Democratic members see it, openingpotentially contested votes up to all the members of the Assembly wouldbe a voluntary abdication of party advantage. The will of the majorityof Democrats, they point out, correctly, might not be done.

“If you had 44 Republicans and 32 Democrats, you couldtheoretically pass a bill that a majority of the Democratic conferenceopposed,” said Assemblyman Richard Brodsky of Westchester, who emergedas the vocal public leader of the opposition to congestion pricing.“That is not the way we run the system. And frankly, it’s not the waywe should run the system.”

Assemblyman Jonathan Bing, a good-government typefrom the East Side of Manhattan, explained it by saying, “The idea thatdemocracy did not occur here [because] it was not a floor vote reallyis incorrect. Democracy occurred with every member of the Assemblymajority providing the speaker with his or her views, whether it was inconference or when the speaker polled members.”

“The process works in ways in which the committee structure weeds outbad bills and kills them,” Mr. Brodsky explained. “In this case, theissue was so important that the conference substituted for a committeemeeting. It was a committee of the whole, as it were.”

And there you have it: democracy, firing-squad style. You know the victim is dead, but you'll never know who pulled the trigger.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

DOT Testimony: Removing Bedford Ave. Bike Lane Will ‘Reduce Safety’

"Removing the protected bike lane won’t remove cyclists — it will only make the street less safe," the DOT said. "The city risks legal liability for knowingly reducing safety on a Vision Zero priority corridor."

June 30, 2025

Hochul Signs Speed Camera Reauthorization, Enforcement Continues Through 2030

Stating a clear fact that scores of state legislators reject, Hochul said, "Speed cameras save lives and keep New Yorkers safe."

June 30, 2025

Cyclists Tell Judge Carolyn Walker-Diallo: The Bedford Ave. Bike Lane is a Lifesaver

A judge will decide the fate of the Bedford Avenue bike lane on Tuesday. Streetsblog offers some user affidavits.

June 30, 2025

DoorDash Lobbying Sunk Bill to Require Apps to Insure Delivery Workers

A secret memo from the rich app company described a simple insurance bill as "costly." And legislators fell into line.

June 30, 2025

Monday’s Headlines: City Hall Handshake Edition

The Department of Sustainable Delivery finally has funding ... but for what? Plus more news.

June 30, 2025

EXCLUSIVE: Council Will Force Apps To Fund Safe E-Bikes for Workers

The City Council is set to pass a bill on Monday that will make app companies responsible for their workers using safe e-bikes.

June 27, 2025
See all posts