Congestion Pricing News of the World

We can barely keep up with the international congestion pricing headlines these days:

  • Mumbai, India to Charge Fees for Driving (Mumbai Newsline)
  • Finland: Half of Helsinki Backs Congestion Charge (Newsroom Finland)
  • New Zealand: Pricing Could Ease Traffic Jams, New Study Suggests (Scoop)
  • Singapore: LTA to Expand Electronic Road Pricing (Channel NewsAsia)
  • Charleston E-ZPass Bill Sets the Table for a Toll Hike (Register – Herald)
  • Innovation Needed, Congestion Pricing, Not More Roads, an Answer (SF Chron)
  • Mary Peters: Forget Gas Taxes, Charge for Road Use Instead (Washington Post)
  • Value Pricing Project Quarterly Report (Transportation Research Board)
  • Strategies for Making Existing Road Infrastructure Perform Better (GAO)
  • Principles of Efficient Congestion Pricing by William Vickrey (Columbia U., 1992)

Thanks to Roger Herz.

  • Dan Icolari

    Re the Mary Peters article: Why not congestion pricing AND a gas tax?

  • Dave

    “You’re not reducing traffic flow, you’re increasing it, because traffic is spread more evenly over time,” he has said. “Even some proponents of congestion pricing don’t understand that.”

    Interesting point. Although the scheme described in this article (the summary of William Vickrey’s ideas on congestion pricing) is slightly different from that currently under consideration for New York, should there still be a worry that congestion pricing will result in more cars travelling at higher speeds (to the disadvantage of other modes, notably bicycling)?

  • From Peters’ article: “it would be virtual policy schizophrenia to increase our reliance on gasoline tax revenue to improve and sustain our nation’s transportation systems while striving to reduce U.S. oil consumption and promote the production and use of alternative fuels.”

    On the contrary, it is policy schizophrenia to claim you want to reduce oil consumption and to refuse to increase the gas tax.

  • Charles Whitley

    According to this article, Mumbai is going to study congestion pricing, not put it in place. Change your misleading headline.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Refresher: What is Congestion Pricing?

By John Kaehny |
There seems to be some confusion by both friends and foes of congestion pricing as to what it actually is. "Congestion pricing" is a term of art that refers to congestion tolls, road pricing or road tolling or other road user fees. It is a concept distinct from charging for parking. The foremost expert on […]

London Reaps Pricing Benefits

By Sarah Goodyear |
From the newsletter of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign comes an inspiring summation of the effects of congestion pricing in London since the program’s inception in 2003, gleaned from Transport for London‘s annual report: Traffic levels in central London were about 20% lower in 2006 than in 2002, the year before pricing began. Bicycle use in […]

Don’t Underestimate the Street Safety Benefits of Congestion Pricing

By Andrew Lassiter |
The primary benefits of the Move NY toll reform plan are reducing congestion and funding transit — but don’t overlook the huge potential to improve street safety. Recent research at Lancaster University in the UK suggests that since the introduction of the London congestion charge in 2003, lethal crashes have fallen faster than traffic congestion. The safety gains have even […]
STREETSBLOG USA

An Animated Argument For Congestion Pricing

By Lewis Lehe |
In 1951, Milton Friedman coauthored a paper on road pricing. It would be a mere footnote in both Friedman’s career and in the intellectual history of road pricing, if not for one sci-fi flourish: The authors propose painting radioactive material alongside expressways, so that road operators can charge drivers using car-mounted geiger counters. Obviously, this […]