New TV Ad Focuses on PlaNYC’s Health Benefits




The Campaign for New York’s Future has released a new poll, a glossy mailer that’ll go out to 380,000 families, and a television advertisement focusing on the health benefits of Mayor Bloomberg’s PlaNYC 2030. The Daily Politics has a nice write-up:

With time running out up in Albany and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver
saying he has no intention of moving on congestion pricing, the
Campaign for New York’s Future, a pro-congestion pricing coalition, has
unleashed a new TV ad and a poll
that indicates support for the proposal increases dramatically once
people are explained the "benefits" of the mayor’s plan — as he sees
them.

The ad features Keisha Lee, a Queens mother who lives near the 59th Street bridge and whose children all have asthma. Here’s some of the script:

We live by the 59th Street Bridge. It’s a nice area, but I think there’s a lot of congestion. All my children have asthma. Basically, it’s like, you know, someone sitting on your chest, and
it’s hard to breathe, and you’re just, you’re like gasping for breath. I think living under the 59h Street Bridge has contributed to my children’s asthma. The air is very bad with all the congestion. With all the traffic going into Manhattan. It is hurting my children. I think we deserve a chance like
everybody else, who want to have clean air nice playground for our
children to play in.

  • James

    If SHELDON SILVER DOESN’T MOVE ON CONGESTION PRICING THEN HE HAS BLOOD ON HIS HANDS!

  • Sarah Goodyear

    I grew up at 64th and Second in an apartment that overlooked the slow-moving stream of traffic heading to the Queensboro Bridge.

    I had asthma as a child and was hospitalized for it several times.

    My son is growing up about half a mile from the BQE. He is five years old. Now he has asthma too.

    Until you’ve seen your child struggling to breathe, or struggled to breathe yourself, it’s hard to understand how horrible this disease is.

    Let’s do something before the next generation of New Yorkers has to suffer.

  • pete

    The BQE may very well end up worse traffic with congestion pricing. Imagine the trucks avoid crossing Manhattan to use Lincoln/Holland Tunnel now using BQE to go toward Verrazano or GWBridge.

  • Respect the Past

    First of all, I do support the congestion pricing plan, but I am interested in everyone’s opinion – would it be easier/cheaper to charge for all parking and also charge a toll for all entries into Manhattan? What would everyone anticipate as the difference between these two methods?

    I know there are already tolls in place, but as others have pointed out, there are methods for getting around the tolls. Therefore, if they found a way of setting up a toll system, along with forcing people to pay “market rate” for parking, wouldn’t this curb the amount of drivers coming into Manhattan and also allocate the costs related to parking from all Manhattanites (even those without cars) to only Manhattanites with cars and to people coming from out of town?

    Comments would be appreciated.

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Groups Dispute Quinnipiac Poll Findings on Congestion Pricing

By Jason Varone |
The Campaign for New York’s Future and The Partnership For New York City both disputed findings from a Quinnipiac University poll of New Yorkers on congestion pricing. Kathryn S. Wylde, President and CEO of The Partnership for New York City released this statement: Contrary to those who want to put their head in the sand […]

Ads Pitch Pricing Benefits to Transit-Taking Majority

By Brad Aaron |
 With the March 31 deadline to qualify for $354M in federal transit funds approaching, the Campaign for New York’s Future and the Empire State Transportation Alliance have rolled out an ad campaign to get the public behind congestion pricing. The three print ads and one TV spot, sponsored by Environmental Defense, direct their audience to […]

It’s Time to Tell Your Reps to Vote for Pricing

By Ben Fried |
The public hearings have been held, the commission has approved a plan, now the votes on congestion pricing are fast approaching. As the March 31st legislative deadline draws near, Transportation Alternatives and other pro-pricing groups are ramping up the advocacy. Yesterday, T.A. sent a message to supporters outlining its strategy. The ad to the right […]

Paterson Backs Pricing, Introduces Bill in Albany

By Ben Fried |
David Paterson is going to do right by his old State Senate district after all. New York’s new governor settled any doubts about his position on congestion pricing this afternoon, introducing a bill that follows the recommendations of the Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission. The Daily Politics has the scoop: "Congestion pricing addresses two urgent concerns […]