45% of New Yorkers Receptive to a Congestion Charge

The congestion charging policy roll-out is officially on the move. Today the Tri-State Transportation Campaign released the findings of a detailed telephone survey conducted last spring in an effort to learn more about how New Yorkers feel about traffic congestion and the idea of making motorists pay more to drive in to the most gridlocked parts of the city. Download TSTC’s report here (PDF). See an excerpt below.

For a sense of why this issue is so sensitive and why the transportation policy community is rolling it out so carefully, check out the lead of today’s Daily News story:

Traffic is so bad that a lot of New Yorkers think there should be more tolls.

While the rest of the News story covers TSTC’s report in a fairly straightforward way, Pete Donohue (or his editor), chose to lead with the scary and the negative — "more tolls." You can imagine Joe Sixpack coming away from this article with images of tollbooths erected along 59th Street. The trick for advocates is going to be to get New Yorkers to come away from articles like these thinking about a faster drive through Midtown, his children not getting asthma, more money for better transit, and most of all — the idea that New York City’s traffic congestion is not an immutable force of nature — it’s a solvable problem.

It’s going to be a huge challenge to get the city’s tabloid media to control its knee-jerk "More Tolls!!?!" reflex and focus on the benefits that people are clamoring for in neighborhoods across the city — less traffic, improved quality of life, better transit, smarter growth, and a healthier city to live, work and raise children. Perhaps it is a good thing that increasing numbers of New Yorkers are turning to blogs for their news, information and analysis.

From the study:

congestion_opinions2.jpg

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

TSTC Asks the Obvious, Yet Elusive, Pricing Poll Question

|
While the results of the latest Quinnipiac congestion pricing poll were repeated with little analysis earlier this week, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign noted a significant, though not surprising, shortcoming. The Quinnipiac poll failed to link congestion pricing to the mass transit improvements it would bring. The pollsters asked this question: “The Bloomberg administration has suggested […]

London Reaps Pricing Benefits

|
From the newsletter of the Tri-State Transportation Campaign comes an inspiring summation of the effects of congestion pricing in London since the program’s inception in 2003, gleaned from Transport for London‘s annual report: Traffic levels in central London were about 20% lower in 2006 than in 2002, the year before pricing began. Bicycle use in […]

Fact Check: Congestion Pricing is Not a “Regressive Tax”

|
One of the most oft-repeated slams against congestion pricing we heard at this week’s Congestion Mitigation Committee hearings is that congestion pricing would be a "regressive tax," an unfair burden to poorer New Yorkers. Is congestion pricing regressive? The data suggests otherwise. As the chart above shows, even in Brooklyn Council member Lew Fidler’s heavily […]

Poll: NYC Blames Bloomberg for Failure to Deal With Traffic

|
A Broken Street: Broadway north of Houston St. on an August Friday. New Yorkers want the Mayor to fix it. The so-called "greatest city in the world" doesn’t even have decently-paved streets, let alone cutting edge transportation features like bus rapid transit, neighborhood traffic calming plans or bicycle-friendly avenues. It may be time to consider […]