Friday’s Headlines: Yes, We’re Still Talking About Congestion Pricing Edition

From the editors: Streetsblog provides high-quality journalism and analysis for free — which is something to be celebrated in an era of paywalls. But the work Streetsblog does is not free; we rely on the generosity of our readers to help support our reporters and editors as they advance the movement to end car dependency in our communities.

If you already support our work, thank you! Can you brag about us to your friends and ask them to support?

If you aren’t a supporter yet, please join us and help us push for a more livable, walkable, bikeable, equitable and enjoyable country for all. And happy holidays from the Streetsblog team!

Here's our New Year's resolution: Do whatever we can to make sure congestion pricing — which is just as sound and legal a policy today as it was when it was created by the state legislature in 2019 — is actually implemented as promised on Jan. 5.

But unlike the weight-reduction or humanity-service goals we make every New Year's Day, we are powerless to stick to this resolution. As our car-loving colleagues at the Times pointed out yesterday, there are so many legal fights still left to win before Gov. Hochul can flip the switch on the tolls (unless she flips the script again). So anything can still happen.

Meanwhile, congestion pricing remains in the news. The other day, contributor Charles Komanoff reminded us that congestion pricing will work, but he went further by offering the benchmarks that the public can watch to make sure they're getting what drivers are paying for.

That story probably came as news to the folks at Governing, which is usually a high-quality media site dedicated to promoting good public policy. In his story about congestion pricing, writer Alan Ehrenhalt asked whether congestion pricing would really work — but focused entirely on whether it will reduce traffic. Yes, it will, of course, but the main unimpeachable benefit of congestion pricing will be funding billions in subway improvements, which is no small thing.

Speaking of small things, congestion pricing was also in the news when it was revealed that New Jersey Rep. Josh Gottheimer lied about how big a fan of Bruce Springsteen he is. How does that relate to congestion pricing? If you recall, Gottheimer was a participant in a 2021 press conference where his congressional colleague Mikie Sherrill argued that congestion pricing would prevent Jersey residents from seeing Springsteen on Broadway, where tickets were so expensive that the then-$15 toll amounted to little more than the cost of a box of Raisinettes at the Walter Kerr Theatre.

In other news:

• Our friends at the Eastern Queens Greenway offered a good explainer on the Council's much-hated Intro 606, which we have been covering a lot.
• So long, DOT? Ydanis Rodriguez might be considering a primary of Council Member Carmen De La Rosa, his former chief of staff. (City & State)
• From the entertainment desk: A person who biked to all of the national parks in the Lower 48 will be hosting a slideshow on Dec. 18 in Soho. For information, go here.
• An "unhinged door" led to an electrical substation explosion that led to a massive subway service meltdown, the MTA said. (Gothamist, NY Post, Daily News)
• Gov. Hochul: Somebody must be to blame. (NBC New York)
• DOT is bringing the gauntlet down on an artist's NYC "Traffic Cam Photobooth." (404 Media)
• Manhattan Borough President Mark Levine officially launched his bid for city Comptroller on Thursday. (NY1)
• And, finally, it's time to honor yesterday's donors to our annual fundraising drive! Thanks, David! Thanks, Gary! Thanks, Hayden! Thanks, Frank! Thanks, Melodie!