Skip to Content
Streetsblog New York City home
Streetsblog New York City home
Log In
Greenways

Getting the Green: Upstate Pol Wants to Unlock Highway Cash for Bike Paths

The proposal could mean a lot more green for New York City greenways.

Greenways in New York City are in desperate need of maintenance, such as this fenced off section along the East River north of 114th Street.

|File photo: Jonah Schwarz

A state grant program currently limited to road and highway projects could allocate money for biking and walking if an upstate pol can convince her Albany colleagues.

Grants from New York's Consolidated Local Street and Highway Improvement Program (oddly abbreviated as CHIPS), are currently calculated based on number of miles of auto lanes and motor vehicle registrations in each municipality — essentially discouraging transportation planners from expanding cycling and pedestrian infrastructure, according to the proposed law's sponsor.

For four decades, CHIPS has doled out funding for maintaining streets that aren’t part of the state highway system. A bill proposed by Assembly Member Patricia Fahy (D-Albany) would open up that money to bicycle lanes, greenway trails, and other multi-use trails — and incorporate their mileage in the calculation of how much financing each municipality gets. 

The proposal, is "like a side-door way of incentivizing localities to do more of these multi-modal paths,” she said.

The old car-focused formula actively discourages officials from removing auto lanes or replacing them with bike paths.

“If local governments were looking to do a road diet, there [is] a disincentive to do that because it would reduce the amount of road miles and as a result reduce the amount of funding,” said Dylan Carey, the director of policy and planning at Parks and Trails New York. “Any transportation facility should be considered lane mileage."

The greenway expert has heard from local planners who tried to get a bike lane installed — only to see their proposal scrapped because officials didn’t want to lose their CHIPS funding. 

“This bill really could be transformative if it is passed, and could unlock a whole new world of opportunity to use existing funding for a wider array of purposes," Carey said.

The extra funding is sorely needed in New York City in particular, where many greenways under the jurisdiction of the city’s underfunded Parks Department have deteriorated for years due to a lack of maintenance. 

New York City already gets more CHIPS money than any other municipality in the state — $108.4 million in new funding in the latest fiscal year —  thanks to its 6,300 miles of streets and highways. The city could get even more money — more than 10 percent more — if its 680 miles of protected bike lanes were also counted.

It’s unclear how exactly the proposed law would affect each city and town’s allocation, according to Fahy. Some elected officials around the Empire State might oppose the change for fear of losing out from the top funding source for their local roads — but that should only encourage them to build more green transportation paths, she said.

“We know we’re being highly ambitious on this one,” Fahy said. “We have a lot of work to do… Taking on these issues, it’s difficult.”

The bill is part of a greenway-focused package the Capital Region lawmaker unveiled late last year, but which has received little media attention outside of local upstate news outlets. The collection of bills also requires safe detours when parts of the Empire State Trail are closed, permit greenway development along electric utility corridors, direct state Bridges and Thruway Authorities to promote bike and pedestrian access to their bridges, and standardize greenway designs. 

The CHIPS funding rejig is the most substantial of the laws, and came out of a 2021 State Parks greenway plan, and Carey said the state should provide local governments the option for greener paths, rather than setting up financial barriers. 

“There should be the option to be more environmentally friendly and provide people alternatives,” he said. “It gives them the option to be spending this on whatever is most important to their communities.”

Spokespeople for both the state and city Departments of Transportation declined to comment.

Stay in touch

Sign up for our free newsletter

More from Streetsblog New York City

World Day of Remembrance: ‘My Brother Did Not Die in Vain’

A drunk driver killed Kevin Cruickshank while he was biking in New York City. The movement for safer streets showed me that my brother did not die in vain.

November 16, 2025

World Day of Remembrance: The Fight to ‘Stop Super Speeders’ Has Gone National

The bills would require the worst of the worst drivers to at least adhere to the speed limit, which is not too much to ask.

November 16, 2025

Council Members Put Everything But Riders First at ‘Bus Oversight’ Hearing

The Council spent its last bus oversight hearing of its term asking the MTA and city to pull back on bus lane enforcement.

November 14, 2025

Community Board Defies Parents in Vote to Reopen Forest Park to Cars

The Parks Department appears to have given in to a vocal group of Queens drivers. Paging Mayor Mamdani!

November 14, 2025

Opinion: Daylighting Isn’t Anti-Driver — It’s Pro-Common Sense

Listen to a Republican: "The Department of Transportation's negative report on daylighting is like judging the effectiveness of lifeboats on the Titanic by studying the ones that never left the ship."

November 14, 2025

Friday’s Headlines: More Agenda Items Edition

Transportation Alternatives laid out, in 85 chunky bullet points, what the next major should do. Plus other news.

November 14, 2025
See all posts