We don't bother with mainstream political analysis very often, so when we're outraged by a media story, it's probably something pretty glaring.
Yes, the Times's deep (yet incredibly shallow!) dive into the mayoral race was, indeed, so glaring that we couldn't look away. Purporting to preview the June primary for City Hall, the story by Emma Fitzsimmons, Dana Rubinstein and Jeff Mays was clearly built around some editor's bizarre framing of the narrative the Paper of Record wants to play out over the next six months.
The frame was reflected in this sentence, "For voters, the contest may boil down to a test of priorities: Do they want a mayor best suited to advance the city’s embrace of progressive policies, or someone best qualified to confront its dire economic concerns?"
It's a false choice because the mayor who embraces progressive policies is, by definition, will be confronting its dire economic concerns. But instead of recognizing that fact, the Times story leaned heavily on the notion that the best candidate will be the one who is strong enough to put aside the childish things on the progressive agenda. The story even dismissed the most progressive candidates with willfully slanted language: "Dianne Morales, a nonprofit executive who wants to defund the police, and Carlos Menchaca, a Brooklyn councilman known for killing the Industry City rezoning ..."
Here's hoping the supposedly progressive, but ultimately quite conservative, Times revisits this false narrative. The only true change in America has occurred during eras of historic inequality — such as at the end of the Gilded Age or during the Great Depression. And as New York confronts just such inequality, we should all be framing the narrative around which candidates are truly agents of change and which are agents of the same system that created this historic inequality.
So if your frame is that a Wall Streeter is "best suited to revive the city’s economy," you might need to have your priorities examined.
OK, off the soapbox. Here's the news:
- The Post followed (and credited!) our exclusive on Council Member Steve Levin's bill to allow people to rat out illegal parkers ... for cash!
- New Jersey commuters are thankful that someone blew the whistle on Academy Bus. (NJ.com)
- Bird scooters continued its goodwill tour, this time bringing its motorized micro mobility to Far Rockaway. (QNS)
- Steve Cuozzo, the ultimate broken clock, opines on city regulations that might hurt restaurateurs. (NY Post)
- Just as Reinvent Albany has been pushing for a cash infusion for the MTA on the basis of how much of the national economy is dependent on its spending, the MTA is now reminding Georgians to vote carefully in the Jan. 5 Senate runoffs — because millions in MTA spending will depend on the agency getting federal funding (which, hint, the Republicans have been blocking). (NYDN)
- The Port Authority is going broke because no one is flying. Time to cancel that LaGuardia AirTrain boondoggle. (NY Post)
- Want to talk to the MTA about the inevitable fare hikes? The agency has posted a list of public hearings. (amNY)
- The Post showed more sympathy for the one owl trapped in the Rockefeller Center Christmas tree than it does for the millions of New Yorkers who experience the same "blaring car horns" that the bird was subjected to.
- Southern Brooklyn cyclists want the city to close the gap in the greenway! (Brooklyn Paper)
Don't miss the revolt by city public school parents over how bad remote learning is for many students (as our old man editor told the mayor at a recent press conference). (NY Times)
