Lyft Decides to Do Something About Its Cab Customers Who Door Its Bike Customers

The company that operates a massive taxi system and the nation's busiest bike share system realizes that it needs to do more to protect its most vulnerable customers.

Lyft-Car-red

As taxi companies like Lyft and Uber get into the bike share business, they face a conundrum: how to get their cab customers and drivers to stop behaving in ways that endanger their bike customers. Lyft is now offering a small new way to help.

Starting this week, Lyft cab passengers will get a notification about 10 minutes into the ride reminding them to look first before opening the car door. It will look something like this:

lyft door warning

In a blog post announcing the new notifications, the company also asked passengers to use the so-called “Dutch reach,” a technique to open a car door with your opposite hand so that your head will turn in the direction of the oncoming traffic.

It’s unclear how many, if any, Lyft customers will read the blog post or watch the PSA about the “Dutch reach.” But the notification did raise some questions about who should be most responsible for keeping people safe outside the cab.

“It’s fine to ask passengers to look before opening their door, but that’s literally the least a company can do,” said Jeff Novich, who created the Reported app, which allows people to easily report errant cabbies to the Taxi and Limousine Commission. “It just passes the blame on to a non-professional.”

Indeed, it’s nice that Lyft is talking about the issue. But the safety problems related to taxis do not begin and end with the passenger. The tens of thousands of Lyft, Uber and conventional taxi drivers routinely pull into bike lanes, idle in bike lanes, park in bike lanes, block curb cuts, obstruct crosswalks and park in bus lanes.

All of this is a danger to the public.

Uber owns Jump and Lyft owns Citi Bike.
Uber owns Jump and Lyft owns Citi Bike.

That’s bad enough in a yellow cab driver, but it’s especially egregious when done by Lyft or Uber drivers, given the companies’ ownership of two massive bike-share companies, Citi Bike and Jump, respectively. The hypocrisy is not lost on cycling advocates. A group of Boston bikers recently sent Uber and Lyft a letter demanding better training for drivers — or at least some sort effort at corporate synergy between the drivers of Lyft or Uber cars and the riders of Lyft or Uber bikes that are constantly being endangered by them.

Uber spokesman Harry Hartfield told the Boston Globe, “We regularly educate drivers on the rules and regulations on bike lanes and hope to meet with these groups to address their concerns.”

For now, Lyft has at least gone one further, with the mobile notifications. Uber did not respond to a request for comment from Streetsblog.

But Novich, for one, thinks both companies can do a lot more, such as barring pickups that would block a bike lane, whose locations could easily be programmed into the companies’ mapping systems.

“When a pickup is requested, the location should be automatically either moved to a side street or area that is not in conflict with a painted bike lane,” Novich said, praising a Lyft pilot program that prevented pickups directly on busy Valencia Street in San Francisco last year. A passenger wanting to be picked up on the “wrong” side of the street could get a message, “Your pickup location is on the west side of the street because we don’t want to block the bike lane on 26th Street,” and a similar message could be sent to the driver (“Make sure to pick up on the west side. Do not block the bike lane as this is illegal, dangerous to cyclists and can incur a $100 fine”), Novich said.

“The data [from Reported] generally shows that the majority of drivers simply are not aware it’s illegal to block bike lanes,” Novich said, citing one of the most-frequent charges against cabbies that come through his app. “We don’t really have an epidemic of ‘dooring’ cyclists. We have an epidemic of blocked bike lanes and a patchwork of poorly designed, conflict-laden bike infrastructure. Lyft isn’t going to solve what DOT or the mayor should be doing, but as the owner of Citi Bike, Lyft can have a lot more influence over how drivers/passengers interact and could be doing a lot more for cyclist safety, given the unique position they’re in.”

Lyft will be offering free Citi Bike rides on April 22 — today! — to commemorate Earth Day. (Details here.)

 

 

 

  • ddartley
  • jeremy

    I’ve said it before, the app should make it impossible to select some areas for pickup/dropoff to prevent from stopping on/near bike lanes

  • If I owned a car, I’d tell everyone to watch out for cyclists before opening the door. If only because why would I want my nice car door to get all dinged up in a bicycle collision, or any kind of collision. In other words this is merely common sense, i.e. let’s not for a second think that Lyft is any better than the average scumbag.

  • com63

    And bus stops, and no stopping zones on streets.

  • Joe R.

    This problem could have been solved decades ago with a mandate to design car doors like these:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scissor_doors

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sliding_door_(car)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_canopy

    This is a classic case of a problem which we have (futilely) attempted to solve via behavioral changes but which could have been completely fixed by engineering changes.

    The payoff isn’t just for bikes, either. There would be no door dings in parking lots. Parking spaces could be packed a little more tightly. The door doesn’t swing out onto pedestrian space on sidewalks. Entering and exiting is also much easier because the door mostly is completely out of the way. These designs probably wouldn’t even cost more if mass produced. Heck, sliding rear doors already exist on minivans.

    The problem is an auto industry resistant to any changes. The fact most cars are still powered by 100+ year old technology is proof of that.

  • Walking NPR

    “This is a classic case of a problem which we have (futilely) attempted to solve via behavioral changes but which could have been completely fixed by engineering changes.” —-NYC Vision Zero, in a nutshell

  • Kimberly

    I do remember the moment when I lost my position couple of months back from my firm in which I have given too much time and hardwork. I was in no way into programs similar to make money “overnight” which later end up being an internet marketing strategies where you should firstly get keen people and then sell a product to friends and family or any person in order that they will be in your team. This web based work has offered me convenience to work at home and now a days I am able to spend valuable time with my children and get enough leisure time to go out on a family trips. This task has offered me an opportunity to generate money approximately $21,000-$22,000 every 4 weeks by doing very simple web job. Go and check one of the most impressive work opportunity.>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://explore486.com

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

STREETSBLOG USA

Can Ride-Hailing Apps Become More Like Buses and Less Like Taxis?

|
A big part of reducing car traffic involves using cars more efficiently. Ride-hailing services like Uber and Lyft are supposedly assisting in this transition by making car ownership less necessary. But even though both companies operate carpool-type services, most of their business still comes from single passenger trips. Other ride-hailing companies are all about shared trips. Network blog Cap’n Transit has […]

DOT and TLC Unveil New Anti-Dooring Video and Decal

|
At a press conference at Union Square this morning, DOT and the Taxi and Limousine Commission announced another facet of the LOOK! campaign, a new video and a decal reminding taxi passengers to exit on the curb side and check for cyclists before opening cab doors. DOT Commissioner Janette Sadik-Khan, Deputy Mayor Howard Wolfson and […]