NYPD to Council: Leave Our Parking Placards Alone!

Police officials returned to the city council transportation committee with the same tired talking points.

Mayor de Blasio announced increased enforcement on placard abuse back in February. Photo: Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office
Mayor de Blasio announced increased enforcement on placard abuse back in February. Photo: Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office

Police officials on Wednesday offered a simple response to City Council Speaker Corey Johnson’s five-pronged legislative approach to curbing rampant parking placard abuse by city employees: no, no, no, no — and, uh, also: no.

And Johnson, for his part, blasted the NYPD for doing “nothing.”

Testifying before the city council transportation committee, NYPD Executive Director of Legislative Affairs Oleg Chernyavsky refused to endorse a single proposal in Johnson’s five-bill package to curb placard abuse — going so far as to diminish the extent of the well-documented problem.

“We acknowledge that placard misuse by city personnel, including our personnel, at times has occurred,” Chernyavsky said, pointing to Mayor de Blasio’s Feb. 21 creation of an electronic placard system, a dedicated placard tow unit, and a three-strike rule against placard abusers as evidence that the police department “takes this issue seriously.”

The council’s bills, however, would go further than de Blasio’s strategy by mandating specific enforcement steps from the NYPD. On that, Chernyavsky was crystal clear: Try again.

Intro. 1393, mandating the NYPD to conduct enforcement blitzes at 50 targeted areas with high numbers of placard abuse complaints, “would require the dedication of significant resources,” Chernyavsky said, also criticizing Intro. 1412, which would authorize private towing companies to remove placard-abusing vehicles. Intro. 1395, requiring NYPD respond to 311 complaints about placard abuse within two days, “poses significant challenges given the extremely short timeline.” Intro. 1422, which would hand over placard distribution to DOT, would create “unacceptable security risks.”

And Intro. 1394 — explicitly prohibiting city vehicles from parking in illegal spots like bus lanes, bike lanes, sidewalks, and fire hydrants except in the case of “documented emergencies” — must be expanded to allow officials to park in those areas during “legitimate law enforcement operations,” he added.

“The answer to placard misuse is one of enforcement and discipline, which continues to be done in significantly increased numbers,” Chernyavsky concluded, though statistics show only a six-percent increase in overall parking summonses issued last year from the previous year.

Other enforcement — such as the creation of an NYPD unit dedicated to parking placard abuse — has also yielded negligible results, and government employees continue to abuse their placard privileges all across the city. There are currently around 150,000 placards in circulation, which effectively allow placard-holders to park wherever they want, whenever they want.

This is what placard abuse looks like. Here's the street across from the 114th Precinct station house in Astoria. Photo: Gersh Kuntzman
This is what placard abuse looks like. Here’s the street across from the 114th Precinct station house in Astoria. Photo: Gersh Kuntzman

No one — not Mayor de Blasio, not the NYPD, not city DOT — has indicated any plans to reduce the number of placards, which Chernyavsky said are “central” to law enforcement activities because they allow officers “to not spend valuable time … circling streets … in search of an unrestricted parking spot.”

In response, Johnson noted the apparent ineffectiveness of NYPD’s enforcement efforts up until this point.

“There’s never any ticket, Oleg. Nothing is done. There have been complaints for years — and nothing is done,” he said, referring to a specific placard abuse hotspot near City Hall. “It doesn’t seem that the enforcement that you’re doing, and what you all have proposed to do, is going to make much more of a difference.”

The NYPD’s Wednesday afternoon testimony was a near carbon-copy of testimony Chernyavsky gave to the city council last June, in response to a different set of council bills aimed to curb placard abuse.

In prepared remarks, advocates blasted the slow pace of progress towards address the scourge of placard abuse, which has been decades in the making.

“It’s sad that we have to have this hearing and consider bills like the ones before you today,” Bike New York Advocacy Director Jon Orcutt said. “It is already illegal for anyone to park or stop a car in a bike lane.”

  • crazytrainmatt

    To soften the blow of losing their free parking, how about giving all NYPD staff a free citibike membership in perpetuity?

  • Jacob

    The NYPD is so rotten and corrupt, that they don’t even pretend not to be.

  • Tooscrapps

    But then they would be forced by their captains to ticket themselves!

  • Daphna

    Why does an agency such as HPD have the comply and carry out new laws with the City Council passes them, but an agency such as NYPD can just say to the law-makers? Why does NYPD not have to comply and adhere to new laws?
    Parking enforcement needs to be done by a private agency, to the police.

  • William Lawson

    And so what if they object on every level? We shouldn’t expect the police to make rational decisions about policing themselves, and we shouldn’t even try to win their support. The NYPD is incapable of getting on board with anything that results in a loss to themselves, so why not just take their opposition as a given and work from there? Instead of worrying what a bunch of halfwits who don’t even live in the city think about how NYC should be run.

  • I literally spit on your stupid placards. Well maybe not quite literally. Windshield.

  • MyBrooklyn1

    If you hate cops, the next time you need help call your local crack head

  • MyBrooklyn1

    If you hate cops, the next time you need help call your local crack head https://twitter.com/MyBrooklyn1

  • MyBrooklyn1

    I say give our underpaid overworked heroes free uber/lyft drive in order for them to leave their cars at home. https://twitter.com/MyBrooklyn1

  • Knut Torkelson

    Nah call the NYPD so they can overreact and accidentally shoot you and few of their fellow officers due to being trigger happy, terribly trained and having near zero accountability for their actions.

  • Knut Torkelson

    Yeah or they can take the subway or bus like their underlings I mean the citizens they serve.

  • This is simply a question of “who is in charge?” In a civilised society, the unequivocal answer would be the civilian government. But not here. In this town we are confronted with an overmilitarised police force that considers the civilian government irrelevant, and that operates in a manner indistinguishable from a military junta.

  • LES Stitches

    Then who polices the police? This is what I don’t understand. Why can nothing be done about this clear out in the open corruption that the NYPD and other agencies openly ADMIT to?

  • The mayor appoints the police commissioner, and so could appoint a reformer who makes it his business to clean the department up. This would surely face resistance from the rank-and-file; but the law presumably gives the commissioner the power to dismiss for insubordination those who defy his orders. The question is whether there exists any potential commissioner who has the will and the courage to make the changes that would be required to root out the systemic rot in that agency. And the answer to that question is “no”.

    More fundamentally, owing to the intractable nature of NYPD corruption, the State could abolish the NYPD and create a new police force; indeed, the NYPD was created by the State in 1857 as a replacement for the City’s corrupt former force, called the “Municipal Police”, which had been authorised by the City’s own laws. (I have read that the NYPD considers its origin to be the Municipal Police’s origin in 1845. But I think a more correct reading ties that agency to the State-created Metropolitan Police that was established in 1857.)

    However, when the State created the Metropolitan Police, the Municipal Police defied the order to disband; and there followed a period of chaos and even open conflict. It wasn’t until a Court of Appeals decision upholding the Municipal Police’s disbandment several months later that the absurd situation of two warring police forces was resolved.

    This suggests that the NYPD would simply ignore any State order for its abolition. (We must remember that the NYPD is a lawless body that answers to no one. The chilling truth is that this agency does not even acknowledge that it is subordinate to the civilian government; so the comparison to a military junta is by no means an exaggeration.) The State would then have the option of sending in the State police, or else standing down. Obviously it would do the latter — which means that the whole route of State action is a complete non-starter.

    So the short answer is that there is no answer.

  • Find a new line.

  • Joe R.

    If the state does nothing if the NYPD defied a hypothetical order to disband the Mayor or Governor can declare a state of emergency, and ask Washington to send in the US armed forces. The NYPD won’t be defying them. They’re much better armed, and they’ll also treat the NYPD as enemy combatants if fired upon.

  • lonianncarusso

    Stop repeating yourself

  • lonianncarusso

    Perfectly said.

  • bluesriot

    same guy?


NYPD Still Resisting Attempts to Reform Parking Placard Abuse

Fraudulent parking placards are rampant in NYC, but NYPD remains opposed to a bill that would require the city to include a barcode on placards to ensure proper enforcement. Testifying before the City Council transportation committee today, NYPD Assistant Commissioner Richard Schroeder cited “significant fiscal, operational, and technological issues that… cannot be resolved within the one year effective […]

NYPD on Parking Perks for Press: Do as We Say, Not as We Do

The City Council’s attempt to return parking privileges to the New York press corps faces opposition, ironically enough, from the New York City Police Department. Intro. 779, sponsored by transportation committee chair Ydanis Rodriguez and 34 of his colleagues, would allow people with press-designated license plates from New York, New Jersey, or Connecticut to “park where parking or standing […]

NYPD Opposes Bill to Curb Placard Abuse as Total Soars to 118,000

At a City Council Transportation Committee hearing today, the New York Police Department announced its opposition to legislation that would curb parking placard abuse by requiring barcodes on official placards. NYPD claimed that it has placard abuse under control and that only Police Commissioner Ray Kelly should have the power to determine what tools are […]