Congestion Pricing Critic Gets the Spotlight During Public Hearing

Richard Brodsky. Photo: Assembly Democrats/Flickr
Richard Brodsky. Photo: Assembly Democrats/Flickr

Transportation advocates and experts blasted Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer for giving a staunch congestion pricing critic his own platform during a March 21 public hearing on the proposal, which is expected to come to a vote in Albany in the next few weeks.

Six politicians sat on stage at Cooper Union during the public hearing and Q&A with an MTA official. But former Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, known for killing congestion pricing back in 2007 when he was still a legislator, also hopped on stage and was given the microphone for several minutes to share his well-known opinions without anyone to offer a counter view.

“It was dumbfounding. Brodsky had every right to appear, to line up at the microphone along with the other citizens. But not that he would be given a spot on the stage and 5-6 minutes to pontificate and spread misinformation,” said an attendee, who asked to remain anonymous. (National expert Charles Komanoff criticized Brodsky in Streetsblog last year.)

Lawmakers by next month may finally pass congestion pricing after years of pressure from transit advocates and elected officials, who worry about the city’s beleaguered subway system and overwhelming gridlock, and the cash-strapped MTA. Mayor de Blasio and Gov. Cuomo outlined a plan last month to set up congestion pricing by 2020. The plan would tax drivers entering Manhattan’s congested central business district — below 61st Street — and would ideally create $1 billion in funding that would go towards fixing the crumbling transit system. 

But many outer-borough and suburban legislators won’t yet endorse congestion pricing arguing that it’s a tax on their constituents, despite evidence that shows very few outer-borough residents regularly drive into the central business district. And critics say that not all of the details have been sorted out yet, including the exact time and cost of the tax, and whether there would be any exemptions, including for yellow cabs, residents living within the district, or those with disabilities.

Brewer said she had voted for congestion pricing back when she was a council member in 2008 and would again now, but needs details to those unanswered questions. She cited her concern for people with disabilities who cannot rely on public transportation, and the increasing struggles of yellow cab drivers.

“I would vote for it today, but only if the details are decided by the community. Key details make or break a good congestion plan,” she said. “First, to be workable there have to be exemptions.”

Brewer was joined by Council Members Carlina Rivera, Mark Levine, and Ben Kallos; Senators Brad Hoylman and Robert Jackson; and Assembly Member Harvey Epstein — all of whom represent parts of Manhattan. But Brodsky was the only non-elected official who got a spot on stage to spew his opinions to the crowd — and a crowd mostly comprised of car owners, by the way.

“I did find it highly unusual he was given that platform and there wasn’t a balanced panel alongside him, including voices of those representing transit riders, and transit riders themselves,” said Tabitha Decker, deputy executive director at the Transit Center. [Brodsky was also a guest of honor at an anti-congestion pricing rally on Sunday.]

Brewer defended giving the former pol the spotlight claiming he offered an opposing view to that of the politicians, most of whom say they support the idea of congestion pricing but are still waiting for all the details to get hammered out. And she had invited notable congestion pricing supporter Charles Komanoff to speak as well, but ended up skipping over him because the politicians attendees took up too much time speaking before the public got a chance to ask questions, according to a rep for the borough president.

“It was a public hearing and Mr. Brodsky had an opposing point of view that we thought was important to be aired,” said the spokeswoman. “There were other experts, including Mr. Komanoff, scheduled but because of the crush of public attendees, the Borough President shifted to those folks quickly — and a bit on the fly.”

  • William Lawson

    “First, to be workable there have to be exemptions.”
    And here we go……

  • Larry Littlefield

    Did anyone try to hold Brodsky accountable for what his generation did to the finances of the transit system? Did anyone accuse his generation of destroying the future and then retiring with tax-free, retroactively enriched pensions while leaving behind a mountain of debt, perpetual tax and fee increases, and service cuts?

    They will keep doing it to us until the truth is spoken.

  • Reader

    “She cited her concern for people with disabilities who cannot rely on public transportation…”

    Can politicians please stop with this somewhat binary and seemingly disingenuous concern trolling? Brewer and others acts like there are only two types of people in the world, those who have full mobility and those who are disabled and can’t take the subway or the bus. Enough with this. There are plenty of people with disabilities who absolutely MUST rely on public transportation. It seems like these people are always left out of the discussion. It’s probably because they don’t help the able-bodied preserve their own driving privileges.

  • lavon

    Most recent survey demonstrates that over 75% men and women are engrossed into online jobs. Internet arena is becoming bigger and more beneficial and generating a lot of opportunities. Work from home on line tasks are becoming poplar and transforming individual’s daily lives. Exactly why it is actually extremely popular? Simply because it allows you to work from anywhere and anytime. You will enjoy much more time to allocate with your family and friends and can plan out journeys for getaways. A lot of people are earning pleasant earnings of $37000 per week by utilizing the efficient and intelligent approaches. Performing right work in a right path will always lead us towards success. You can begin to earn from the first day at the time you look at our web-site. >>>>> START NOW

  • Adamlaw

    I’m presuming Brodsky was also among those legislators responsible for eliminating the commuter tax years ago. Shame on him!

ALSO ON STREETSBLOG

Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission Opens for Business

|
Westchester Assembly member Richard Brodsky on Mayor Bloomberg’s congestion pricing proposal: "My problem is that I don’t understand what you’ve proposed." "This is going to be interesting," Straphangers Campaign Senior Staff Attorney Gene Russianoff said as he waited for the start of yesterday’s inaugural Traffic Congestion Mitigation Commission meeting. "Usually with these things, the fix […]

The Week in Review

|
The Copenhagen SUV finds its way stateside CONGESTION OBSESSION: What is congestion pricing? That’s the questionable question at the crux of the debate between those who say New York must implement something like the Bloomberg plan in order to collect $354 million in federal funds, and those who don’t. It seems "those who don’t" would […]

Three Questions for Richard Brodsky

|
We called Assemblyman Richard Brodsky yesterday to get his comments on the demise of congestion pricing. While he wouldn’t talk to us on the phone, he fielded a few questions over e-mail.  Streetsblog: With congestion pricing off the table and the deadline to receive $354M in federal support about to pass, will other traffic mitigation […]

It’s the Bus Riders, Stupid.

|
Is Mayor Bloomberg’s congestion pricing plan, a regressive tax, unfair to New York City’s poor and working class? That’s what Westchester Assembly member Richard Brodsky and quite a few of the other critics claim. Before last week’s public hearing before the state legislature Brodsky cited a study commissioned by City Hall showing the mayor’s plan […]